BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Myra Hindley

 
  

Page: 1(2)

 
 
Fist of Fun
14:45 / 05.07.02
I'm slightly amazed that Home Secretaries still feel that they have the power to do this. Haven't similar decisions been ruled unlawful by various EU courts? - E. Randy Dupre

The case you are thinking of is Dennis Stafford -v- UK. I think it was May 2002 the European Court of Human Rights held that the decision of how long a prisoner should serve should be taken by a judge rather than a politician, in order to comply with article 5(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights (right to liberty and security).

Don't forget, however, that the ECHR's decisions are not binding on the UK - merely persuasive. (This is different from the European Court of Justice, the EU court, which is binding.) The government has indicated it intends to maintain the Home Secretary's power to set tariffs, despite having (I think) removed this power in Scotland where only judges set sentences.
 
 
Fist of Fun
14:57 / 05.07.02
Sorry, I correct myself. Stafford's case was determined on two grounds:
Article 5(1) - which was to do with the fact that he had been released on license and then put back in for a fraud offence, which then retriggered the life sentence. This was considered (effectively) excessive punishment.
Article 5(4) - which was to do with the Home Secretary setting the tariff. It was this part of the judgment which held that the process was not acceptable because it lacked the necessary judicial safeguards such as an oral hearing.
 
  

Page: 1(2)

 
  
Add Your Reply