BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Semi-detached couple

 
 
Fist Fun
10:31 / 20.06.02
Anyone spot this article in the observer. Quite interesting. It talks about "a particularly modern phenomenon: the semi-detached couple (SDC)". The key idea is "I want to be me, not half of a neat little unit."
Does anyone think this is at all interesting or new? Isn't this just the idea that going out with someone is far preferable to being married (or similar).
Anyone got any comments on the article or the general idea?
 
 
Ganesh
11:02 / 20.06.02
As "half of a unit" upon which semi-detached status has been geographically forced for just over eight months, I read that with interest. Like you, Buk, I'm a little suspicious of the supposedly "growing trends" regularly uncovered by Sunday supplement lifestyle columnists. While committed-couple-living-apart status is hardly uncommon, as a permanent relationship model, I'd imagine it's pretty rare - especially if, like the couple in the article, one only sees one's partner at weekends.

In some ways, living apart has been easier than I'd expected: after the initial pain (and it was real, near-physical pain) of separation, we've settled into a routine. Fridays are bubbly with excitment, the four-and-a-half-hour journey seems negligible, much alcohol is consumed, we usually go out, sometimes dance. Saturdays we sleep until around midday, potter about on the computer, visit friends, see a film, etc. Sundays are miserable, both of us conscious of every minute bringing the evening closer, with its 'Brief Encounter' goodbyes.

Knowing it's temporary, we make the most of it - and 'stolen' weekdays, mobile 'phones and Barbelith all lighten the load. There's still a sense that we're both living a sort of half-life, however: socialising with 'non-couple' friends and work colleagues is relegated to the working week, and the relentless Edinburgh-London shuttling leaves little room for spontaneity.

I'm sure some people are sufficiently good at compartmentalisation to switch between 'work', 'relationship' and 'socialising' modes at ease. Not me. I can cope with a semi-detached relationship on a short-term basis but every part of me yearns to resume our old-fashioned co-dependent life.
 
 
Shortfatdyke
11:04 / 20.06.02
the couple in the article do sound rather 'detached' emotionally, like they're not actually in love or anything, but i don't think there's anything wrong with the concept of what they're doing - it's pretty honest. i suppose i'm cynical about the whole 'true love/commitment' thing due to my own failings in that department. love is only a passing phase. why get tangled up in something that can only ever be a temporary arrangement? on the other hand, you could say life's too short not to really go for it. happiness, even for a short time, is a good thing.
 
 
Lurid Archive
11:40 / 20.06.02
Like Ganesh, I have also been geographically separated from my other half, though at a much smaller distance. Reading his post makes me realise how similar our experiences have been though for me this is thankfully at an end now.

Like him I found the start very difficult but managed to find some sort of routine. Over a period of time however, the travel and separation were particularly wearing especially when either of us had some stressful or upsetting event to cope with.

I think that the relationship in that form would have been unsustainable for much longer; the separation would have had to become emotional as well as physical for us to properly function and avoid the "half-lives" Ganesh talks about.

I don't really understand the idea of having a relationship that is a calm, detached union where two people operate fairly independently. I want someone to excite, interest and challenge me. I want the relationship to be intense, romantic and electric.

I've never been in an SDC and if I found myself in one, I would probably leave it.
 
 
Ganesh
12:03 / 20.06.02
I think we vary in the degree to which we desire/allow our boundaries - physical, psychological, social - to blur with another person's. Prior to meeting ZoCher, I'd always been very aware of a personal need to maintain boundaries; with him, I just wanted to fling caution to the wind, move in, immerse myself. So I did. That's never happened with anyone else and I guess it's one of the things that defines our relationship. For me, a semi-detached relationship just wouldn't seem like love...
 
 
DaveBCooper
13:51 / 20.06.02
Reminded me at first of the way Woody Allen and Mia Farrow maintained separate apartments on opposite sides of Central Park… and then (as I read more, and found myself agreeing with sfd’s observation about them sounding emotionally detached) I realised it was like the ‘Open Relationship’ sketch from ‘Not the None O’Clock News’, where it become gradually apparent that the people don’t actually know each other at all.
(“I always think that if you love someone, then knowing them isn’t really an issue”, or words to that effect).

All of which is to say : don’t really think it’d work for me.

DBC
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
14:19 / 20.06.02
Well, bear in mind that anyone who appears in a weekend magazine talking about their relationship is already going to be "emotionally detached" to the point of psychosis - compare Mil Millington's columnm, which should probably be called "My girlfriend and I are the scum of the Earth, and probably just about deserve each other in our mindless, meaningless tango of horror, but lacking even the postage stamp-sized stain of self-awareness that the most unsalvagable Guardian reader can usually boast we believe the nasty brown farts of our hideous existence somehow justify a) a national column and b) a photograph of the two of us displaying that we both have the same fucked-up nose and as such may possibly be related"...

Or, to put it another way, the fact that two tiresome middle-classers, one of whom works with *computers*, for Christ's sake, are not necessarily emotionally competent hardly makes for a total refusal of what indeed is hardly a very new thing at all. It seems like a perfectly pleasant setup - she likes being together at weekends but has no wish to indulge his deeply adolescent habits, he wants to play at grown-ups without actually having to accept responsibility for, say, a child. Seems perfectly happy all round. And, you know, long-term fully committed relationships are formed despite being nightmarishly ill-conceived, emotionally stunted and abominably destructive *every single day*.

Why a relationship should be more valid due to a shared address or a certain number of hours punched into the clock I have no idea...
 
 
Mourne Kransky
14:50 / 20.06.02
Good for the semi-detached, say I. Takes all sorts etc. and at least their modus vivendi appears to be mutually life-enhancing. They have stopped whining about the deficiencies of the standard options and adapted. Wouldn't do me but why should they care about that?
 
 
Lurid Archive
15:34 / 20.06.02
Absolutely, Zocher. This is such a personal area that all we can offer are personal opinions, preferences and experiences. We can hardly go around trying to tell others how to conduct their romantic lives unless we hit the borders of abuse.
 
 
Fist Fun
12:02 / 23.06.02
I'll add another absolutely Zocher. To pick up DBC's point about being emotionally detached. Possibly... but that isn't a bad thing. Is it?

I was a bit suprised by most of the replies actually. For me, the idea of full on cohabitation doesn't seem all that alluring. Semi-detachment seems a very nice middle ground. I've always enjoyed long-distance relationships as well. Spending time independently, writing letters, travelling to meet, planning.
 
 
Ganesh
12:15 / 23.06.02
Doing it every week, however, is a major-league pain in the arse...
 
 
Cloudhands
12:18 / 23.06.02
...arguing on the telephone and not being able to make up in person, having your life in limbo, spending vast amounts of money on travelling etc. The semi-detached relationship did not work for me! I think it can only be sustainable for a brief period of time. Unless of course you are 'emotionally detached', which I do consider a bad thing. Personally a relationship where you are completely in love with and emotionally connected to the person is much more fufilling. Emotionally detached relationships are just a subsitute for this.
 
 
Cavatina
13:06 / 23.06.02
Live-apart or live-in love partnership? So much depends on the circumstances of the individuals concerned, and the stage of their relationship. The former can work well if, besides the relationship, one or both are directing a lot of energy to writing or an artistic endeavour. With two love nests there is not the need to modify as many personal habits and the individuals can have distance from each other's friends and relations.
 
 
Persephone
19:57 / 23.06.02
I dunno, it's probably sexier. Don't you think that you could sort of stretch out that initial falling-in-love stage, maybe indefinitely, by being semi-detached? Particularly if you can live in the same city. Plus it would be nice to have a second apartment.

Ah well, next time...
 
 
Ganesh
00:03 / 03.08.02
I've gratuitously revived this thread to say

HOORAY! ZOCHER MOVES TO LONDON AT THE END OF SEPTEMBER!! SEMI-DETACHED COUPLE REUNITED!!!

Thankyou.
 
 
Murray Hamhandler
06:05 / 03.08.02
The one I love the most lives 2000 miles away. The one she loves the most lives the same distance away. We are reluctantly semi-detached. We've discovered that, for us anyway, it's just not as easy as pulling up roots and settling down together somewhere. Not at this stage in our lives, anyway. And long-distance relationships are frustrating and don't work. We've agreed to at least pretend to see other people, to not restrict our romantic life to another whom we can rarely see. I can't imagine ever meeting anyone who could come close to making me feel the way that she does. Every day hurts a little. We tell each other that it's for the best, but is it? Really?

It hurts, but I think it is for the best right at the moment. We both have some growing and preparing to do, and we still have the rest of our lives to be w/one another.
 
 
Fist Fun
11:45 / 03.08.02
Congrats on the move down to London Zocher. I am sure you two will have a great time. Coincidentally enought my girlfriend is going be moving up to Edinburgh at the end of September. A bit worried about it despite my previous post about the joys of living it long. Looking forward to spending more time in the Subway West End though .
 
  
Add Your Reply