|
|
Yeah, I agree its attitude and focus. And you can also consider someone is very lucky while he himself does not.
In short, I consider luckiness is for the non-magickian what magickal power is to the magickian. If you have a magickal intention (an intention you just can't go and hit a button, a phone call, and make it happen) you of course will consider yourself more magickally powerful (or luckier if you are next-door-John) the more your intention is fulfilled in the consensual world.
Magick is then somewhat adjusting your luckiness in line with your desires, and the word "metaprogramming" comes in handy for this. For spontaneously lucky and happy people that are not magickians, and see all their desires fulfilled, yes, I agree it is related to their own metaprogramming, of which they may be aware of not (just listen to any happy-John-who how he changed his life and luck for the better, and you'll get an excelent on-the-street dissertation on accruing magickal power without it ever being mentioned). The magickian is just consciously devoting himself (and his brain/soul/whatever) to this metaprogramming, and sort of assuming that he and the universe have no limits on desire fulfillment, so any worthy magickal system has implied that any experience can be experienced.
Back to the beginning,
"while reading a book on magick, there was a reference to advanced sorcerors appearing 'lucky' to the outside world."
I have met two, and read about many, quite powerful sorcerers, that to the urban western-man appear as total loosers in term of commodities and economical choices, but you really do not want them to give you the "eye". And of course, you would never dare asking them if they consider themselves to be "lucky". |
|
|