|
|
My reasoning:
Moderators aren't just there to fix links, clear up mistakes or delete threads. We're there to instigate conversation, to ensure that the fora we're responsible for are lively, fair, entertaining and interesting, to help make them the best they can be*.
My problem is this:
If I choose to ignore someone, whether they're a regular contributor to Music or not, chances are that I'll end up missing out on opportunities to explore avenues for further discussion that could really benefit the forum. Say that I ignore Poster X. Now, one of X's replies to a topic contains a point of view or piece of information as a throwaway remark that could form the basis of another thread, but nobody else picks up on it. By ignoring X's contributions I'm increasing the chances that a potentially fantastic thread never gets created.
I've also been finding some of the current personal grudge-matches extremely petty, and can't shake the feeling that the Ignore function is simply making things worse in those cases, being a means of sticking fingers in ears and going 'Nah nah na-nah nah, can't hear you' rather than attempting to find common ground.
Basically, you (general 'you', not aimed at any specific suit) asked to be made a moderator of whatever forum because you're interested in the topic that is discussed there. If you're going to ignore somebody because you don't like their point of view then you really can't be all that interested in the subject. If you're ignoring somebody because you don't like the manner in which they express their opinions then there are far batter ways of solving the problem. Keep battling it through with them, whether you choose to do that within the forum itself or via private communication.
*An area of moderation that I've been slack on, admittedly, but due to time constraints and infrequent 'Net access more than anything else. |
|
|