|
|
I'm going to start a thread about this someday in Headshop, it's been on my mind in a variety of contexts lately.
The thing is that I don't think this model of a demonstration - that we go out there with our banners and some "unconverted" people see it and change their minds, until gradually everyone has their consciousness raised and the world becomes a better place - is the right one to work with. Part of the point of the May Day protests is precisely to preach to the converted - to bring together a lot of semi-like-minded people in a *very* loose, cyborgian coalition, so that we can all feed off each other's energies and create a sort of baby-universe in which our dreams for the future are respected and, in a very limited way and for a very limited time, almost-realized.
There's also a sense in which demos/protests are the domestic labour of the revolution: not so much about producing anything tangible like a changed mind, but (a) if no-one showed up on May Day, the pro-capitalist media would be like "Ha! See, everyone's happy! There's nothing wrong!" and (b) we have to continuously maintain a semi-imaginary space in which our dreams and energy can flourish in an atmosphere of mutual support and respect.
Okay, I sound like a filthy hippy, and I do think that there are other effects that the protests can have, but I *don't* think that just because (to take an extreme view, and not to get at lentil's friend or anyone else) the president of MacDonald's doesn't slap his forehead and cry "Of course! Kitten placards! I'll dismantle my empire and build a network of small Fair Trade outlets instead!", we should think of protests as non-productive. They're just not productive in a simple or predictable or classic way. |
|
|