Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.

Im asking a lot here...

bitchiekittie

13:39 / 03.05.02

...but could you do your best to limit your responses to one word?

1. are you for, against, or indifferent to a gaming forum?

2. if not a gaming forum, then one devoted to "play" (not just RPGs but all games, sports, the like)?

3. would you use it?

this isnt a vote, really - the only reason I ask is because here its been suggested that there arent that many interested parties and suggested by at least one person that those interested would be comprised mainly of board misfits. I dont claim that the former is false, Im just curious, because it seems as if a lot of you seem to play

Captain Zoom

13:42 / 03.05.02

1. starting to feel indifferent to the whole fucking place, but I'm for a gaming forum, or an amalgamated one in the spectacle.
2. yes, a play forum would be cool
3. Yup, most certainly.

Zoom.

betty woo

13:42 / 03.05.02

1. indifferent, based on...
2. Yes.
3. Most likely, depending on the tone of conversation.

sleazenation

13:43 / 03.05.02

1. no
2. no.
3. no

pointless and uncalled for

13:45 / 03.05.02

1) Pro
2) Yes
3) Yes

bitchiekittie

13:45 / 03.05.02

better answer my own

1. maybe
2. yes
3. no

bitchiekittie

13:46 / 03.05.02

and a sorry to tom, I didnt see your posts on the new forums thread before I did this thread

Bear

13:47 / 03.05.02

1. I'm FOR it, because I know it'll be sensible (have you tried using another gaming forum
2. For ALL GAMES/and anything to do with the games industry really
3. Indeeeed

w1rebaby

14:00 / 03.05.02

1. don't mind as long as there's somewhere
2. "play" would be an interesting idea
3. course I would

Less searchable M0rd4nt

14:03 / 03.05.02

1. a gaming forum? No. Too specific/limited.
2. or a "play" forum? Yeah, if there was enough interest to make it work.
3. would you use it? Maybe. Well, I'd read it.

Cherry Bomb

14:17 / 03.05.02

1. undecided
2. maybe
3. maybe

yes, yes n' yes?

1. Probably
2. Yup
3. Yup

Tripleplusungood.

1. I'm against the creation of a dedicated "gaming" forum.
2. I'm for it, only if it's in the Participation area.
3. I might use the "play" forum, but definitely not a "gaming" forum.

Spatula Clarke

14:49 / 03.05.02

1. Against. Far, far too narrow a definition.
2. Possibly.
3. Unlikely. Depends on topics.

Sax

15:12 / 03.05.02

1. Not arsed

2. Not arsed.

3. Not arsed.

Saint Keggers

15:21 / 03.05.02

1. 4
2.ok
3.yup

Elijah, Freelance Rabbi

15:22 / 03.05.02

1 NO, i never suggested a gaming forum nor did i want a gaming only forum
2 YES a play forum would be handy, kinda like the gathering but without all that uh..interaction...
3 yes

Trijhaos

15:25 / 03.05.02

1. No.
2. Yes.
3. Sure.

ONLY NICE THINGS

15:37 / 03.05.02

1. The 2. Jack 3. Position

wembley can change in 28 days

18:22 / 03.05.02

1. No
2. Maybe
3. Only during the Stanley Cup and the Olympics, and if I can use it to discuss yoga.

Murray Hamhandler

20:07 / 03.05.02

1. Probably not if there were an option to say...
2. Maybe about this one. That would depend on how useful it is to the population at large, although...
3. No, I probably personally wouldn't post in it. I'd probably browse, though.
Arthur Sudnam, II

The Knowledge

11:50 / 04.05.02

1. No
2. Yes. The playground. (And hows about a flaming forum called The Slayground?)
3. Yes.

Ganesh

12:06 / 04.05.02

1) For
2) Yes (with the proviso that 'play' does not simply equal 'trolling' and subsequently become a more flame-heavy version of the Conversation).
3) Yes

Steve Block

18:59 / 04.05.02

1. No
2. Maybe
3. Doubtful

m. anthony bro

01:41 / 05.05.02

1.computer games are boring
2. if we could talk about sport, then I would have a hardon for such a board.
3. the board or the hardon? probably.

ill tonic

05:32 / 05.05.02

1.No.
2.Indifferent.
3.If something caught my attention - sure - why not?

Add Your Reply