|
|
Just got the record, via AG, and it's quite different from what I expected. Have read and heard about them, but not actually heard them yet. Based on the people I know who've done shows with them, I fugured Trail Of Dead would be a little more, uh, crappy semi-ambient goth. They certainly have a lot more rock than I expected.
But I like the record and I agree with Flux in that there's a lot of indie-rock precedents at work here. I hear Pavement and Slint primarily - as much as I liked this one it really just made me want to listen to Spiderland. That's not really a dig at the band, just a whim.
I doubt these guys, as they are now, really have what commercial radio demands. I can't see them achieving the kind of saturation necessary for U2-like success. But then, U2 didn't have that in 1981, either...
I have to say that compromise does preclude musical credibility. It's all well and good for Bono to talk about giving people what Bono wants, but I don't buy it. (But then, I don't buy his records, either.) Either you want music or you want dollars. If Trail of Dead want dollars, that's fine, but it just means that I probably won't like their records for very long. I like Spiderland and the fact that this record reminds me of Slint is good, but lack of marketing isn't the only reason a Slint or Pavement never sold 8 bajillion records. |
|
|