BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Troll Definitions, for the Curious

 
 
Ierne
23:28 / 15.03.02
(call me a neophyte but what exactly is the definition of troll?) – casemaker

I saw this in the now-closed Membership thread; despite the understandable reluctance of most of us (myself included!) to go through the whole story again, I thought bringing in some quotes from another closed thread would help clarify the situation. It's a bit lengthy, but I think necessary right now. I hope what comes through in the quotes is that trolling is a matter of intent and behavior; the point of view expressed is secondary to the manner in which it is expressed.

{I decided to break it up into separate posts – hopefully that'll make it easier to read. The first stab at a definition comes from Trijhaos:}

Here's a nice definition:
[From the Usenet group alt.folklore.urban] To utter a posting on Usenet designed to attract predictable responses or flames; or, the post itself. Derives from the phrase "trolling for newbies" which in turn comes from mainstream "trolling", a style of fishing in which one trails bait through a likely spot hoping for a bite. The well-constructed troll is a post that induces lots of newbies and flamers to make themselves look even more clueless than they already do, while subtly conveying to the more savvy and experienced that it is in fact a deliberate troll. If you don't fall for the joke, you get to be in on it. See also YHBT. 2. n. An individual who chronically trolls in sense 1; regularly posts specious arguments, flames or personal attacks to a newsgroup, discussion list, or in email for no other purpose than to annoy someone or disrupt a discussion. Trolls are recognizable by the fact that they have no real interest in learning about the topic at hand - they simply want to utter flame bait. Like the ugly creatures they are named after, they exhibit no redeeming characteristics, and as such, they are recognized as a lower form of life on the net, as in, "Oh, ignore him, he's just a troll." – Trijhaos
 
 
Ierne
10:13 / 17.03.02
Tom responded with another excellent definition:

A troll is generally defined as an individual who gets their kicks starting fights or angling for arguments. Intention is the issue here, not normally what the arguments contain.
Typical ways of triggering arguments for the sake of arguments include writing statements that the group concerned will NEVER agree with - these are often dressed up as challenging 'core assumpions'. However, in the vast majority of cases these core assumptions are the things that have been thought about MOST by members of a community - not least - and the community is actually normally trying to talk about something else...
For example - Barbelith is essentially a community based around a kind of idea of rebellion, entertainment, distrust of authority, freedom and tolerance of people. Basically - I suppose you could argue that it's anti-hate, futurist and (at some level) utopian...
With these as unspoken principles behind the site - it would be kind of ridiculous to come to the site and say homophobia or racism were good things. UNLESS YOU WERE MERELY ANGLING FOR AN ARGUMENT FOR FUN.
Most people who engage in most discussion get bored of confrontation as an end unto itself after a while and want to move on to talking about the things that interest them. People on barbelith, for example, generally LOVE to have their ideas challenged - but they also have to be CONVINCED by the challenge, PERSUADED by the challenge. If presented with a YOU'RE WRONG, or a bit of simple contradiction or very cheap argument. Trolls aren't generally interested in extending themselves beyond cheap rhetoric, obvious button-pushing and aggressively presented, but essentially shallow argument. And so they're not very interesting or welcome on most boards...
Having said all of that, I think that it would not be inconceivable to say that people with actual beliefs that they want to express, who don't have a sense of a board, may get unfairly categorised as trolls.
So yes - it's possible to say that if something someone said affected you at a very primal level, then you might react to them as if they were trolling when they had an honest question or thought. Similarly there might be a reaction to a home truth that people didnt' want to connect with. But generally, if these things are presented carefully and intelligently, they won't get this kind of relationship.
At the end of the day - a board is a community - and communities come together for a REASON - or in the case of Barbelith for many reasons... If someone comes to Barbelith for reasons that are antithetical to everyone elses - and actively worked against them, then it is possible that they wouldn't feel particularly welcome.
But to be honest I can't understand why they'd be here in the first place - why actively fight to have your say in a space populated by people who react really badly to everything you say - and with a group as liberal as Barbelith, shouldn't the assumption not immediately be that Barbelith people are over-reacting, but that actualy you may have said something kind of dumb... – Tom
 
 
Ierne
10:17 / 17.03.02
Some humorous – but thoughtful – input form Ganesh and Flux:

Troll also generally = one-trick = (eventually) boring. – Ganesh v4.2

A troll is a guy that thinks he's fly, and is also known as a buster. Always talkin' about what he wants, and just sits on his broke ass. But a troll is checkin' me, but his game is kinda weak. And I know that he cannot approach me, cuz I'm lookin' like class and he's lookin' like trash. Can't get wit' no deadbeat ass.
I don't want no trolls, a troll is a guy that can't get no love from me. – Flux=Native New Yorker


Learned behaviour, probably from early childhood. For whatever reason, obtains more ego-gratification from irritated-attention than from friendly-attention - or is simply unable to differentiate. Encopresis Boy.
Blah. – Ganesh v4.2
 
 
Ierne
10:20 / 17.03.02
Another reminder that trolling is about intent, not about difference of opinion:

A BBS is a community...communities require social accord - an agreed-upon form for intellectual dialogue, an etiquette system - to function without fragmenting. The dilemma then is not the nature of the specific ideas discussed [which are much broader in the BBS context than, let's say, a neighborhood or town council] but the form of address required not to simply attack one's opponent ad hominem. – [monkey - greatest sage of all]

[ 17-03-2002: Message edited by: Ierne ]
 
 
Ierne
10:26 / 17.03.02
More from Tom:

Argument is not about people shouting at each other, it's about *convincing* each other - and a good argument requires at least two participants to treat each other with respect, listen to each other's opinions, concede when they're wrong, not gloat when they are right, and treat the exercise as an attempt to refine one's own ideas.–Tom

But what it comes down to is that in a community every person should be at least a little considerate of everyone else - this means listening to them, trying to help them reach whatever goals they have, attempting to guage with them as people etc. A utopian community would not require any rules or restrictions because no one would try and fuck it around - utopian communities need utopian members. But in Barbelith every so often someone will do something that is just designed to derail any conversations, discussions, arguments or constructive works that other people are attempting to engage in. After a certain point, if that continues, the board becomes completely useless. – Tom

I think that a certain respect for the work that other people put into the board and the ability to listen to arguments and respond to them intelligently are PRECISELY the criteria that Barbelith should use when thinking about who should post on the board. And when you talk about a misunderstood person being smacked around, I'm afraid I see it in completely the opposite fashion again - I think that there's no justification whatsoever for alllowing said 'misunderstood person' from smacking the rest of the board around to fulfill their own personal needs for attention. – Tom
 
 
Ierne
10:35 / 17.03.02
Okay, here's the last of the bunch

[monkey - greatest sage of all] had some really good points to make– here's two:

Personally I don't give a shit about who's behind the fictionsuit; perhaps Osama bin Laden is yanking all our chains. My sole issue is interpersonal etiquette. Ideological and conceptual shit I can take or leave at my own choice...what bothers me is an individual electing to deliberately offend others in an obvious and blatant fashion. For reasons that I will extrapolate upon, I do not feel, either contextually or generally, that "offense" is an effective tool of intellectual subversion, especially in the style deployed. – [monkey - greatest sage of all]

Rather than drawing out or reinforcing his intial statement, {the troll} simply says [in one way or another] "well really I was just subverting your paradigm. Ha-ha. The para-Dadaists strike again!". After the first application, this idea ceases to be subversive, but is merely arrogance lapsing into the sollipicistic...you can point out the existence of a consensual paradigm once and be clever. From there on out it becomes provocation for it's own sake, the smugness of someone who holds "revealed knowledge" wanking on the heads of the intellectually lesser. – [monkey - greatest sage of all]

[monkey] clarifies hir above statement as follows:
"Actually, the syntax and phrasing states that {the troll} is a pseudo-Dadaist one-trick pony, not that all of Dadaism being one-trick... Sorry about the lack of clarity there."

I really hope this thread helps people realize that there is a difference between someone disagreeing with you and someone harassing you, and that the above information hepls you deal with the situation accordingly. (I could use Mordant's coffee-maker gremlin right about now...)
 
 
casemaker
12:57 / 22.03.02
Thanks Ierne. I appreciate it.

Now I feel like I understand what much of the consternation was about.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
13:01 / 22.03.02
quote:Originally posted by Ierne:
(I could use Mordant's coffee-maker gremlin right about now...)


 
 
Trijhaos
12:25 / 02.05.02
I figure this is a good a time as any to bump this thread to the top, since some people still don't understand what a troll is.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
12:30 / 02.05.02
Or affect not to understand, anyway.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
13:47 / 02.05.02
Some more useful definitions:


pseudo /soo'doh/ n.

[Usenet: truncation of `pseudonym'] 1. Persona adopted by a human for amusement value or as a means of avoiding negative repercussions of one's net.behavior.


sock puppet n.

In Usenet parlance, a pseudo through which the puppeteer posts follow-ups to their own original message to give the appearance that a number of people support the views held in the original message.


kook

Term used to describe a regular poster who continually posts messages with no apparent grounding in reality. Different from a troll, which implies a sort of sly wink on the part of a poster who knows better, kooks really believe what they write, to the extent that they believe anything.

The kook trademark is paranoia and grandiosity. Kooks will often build up elaborate imaginary support structures, fake corporations and the like, and continue to act as if those things are real even after their falsity has been documented in public.

An entertaining web page chronicaling the activities of many notable kooks can be found at http://www.crank.net/usenet.html


(All of the above derived from This site.
 
  
Add Your Reply