BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Queen of the Damned sneak preview (spoilers)

 
 
Kali, Queen of Kitteh
00:11 / 22.02.02
Last night Grendix and I went to see a sneak preview of Queen of the Damned.

The crowd was a bizarre mix of gay male Anne Rice fans, hip-hop kids, and of course, the Goth contingent.

Let me say this firsthand: if you didn't like the books even a teeny bit, then don't waste your money to sit through something you'd probably just bitch about.

That said, here we go:

The film itself is very stylish, and were we to make a comparison to the previous Vampire Chronicles film, then Interview with the Vampire would be like a daguerrotype. Very much a period piece--even when Louis is talking to Daniel--that particular film conveys a sense of classicism, sadness, and tragedy. Not so with QOTD. If IV is indeed a daguerrotype, the QOTD is flashy, tech-savvy, fast-paced, top-of-the-line laptop. Even the flashbacks to Lestat's creation--extremely brief--don't really seem like they were set two hundred years ago. Stuart Townsend is absolutely captivating as Lestat--it was sort of neat because he really does look more like what I had often Lestat appear like--he is pompous, predatory, magnetic, and sexual. The only downside is that he plays Lestat as too much of a predator; the sympathy we often read Lestat expressing is woefully absent. (Don't even count the scene with the violinist. I have no idea why they bothered with that if they were going to have his manager in the present choose two girls for him kill at every stop.) Aaliyah, strangely, is touted as being a large part of the film, when really, her part doesn't really make that much of a difference. Her accent is horrible, when she talks, it sounds like she's got a reverb pedal hidden somewhere under her smelted breastplate. She mostly just looks evil and says particularly trite dialogue. Looks good in fangs, though. Vincent Perez--who plays Marius, who in the film is called Lestat's creator--is quite amusing. I think he's the subtle comic relief, but I can't figure out if that's intentional. Lena Olin gets billing as Maharet, but she's in the film for all of ten minutes, if that. Again, she looks good. In fact, all of the actors playing the vampires look so fucking eerie, I give a shout-out to the make-up artists. I swear to God they all glow. Pretty and unnatural being the operative words here. The plot itself is supposedly taken from The Vampire Lestat and the Queen of the Damned, but that's very thin line.

Here's the plot: Lestat wakes up from supposed hundred sleep--in this universe, Claudia and Louis and Gabrielle don't exist, apparently--to the sounds of a rock band. (Well, thank god, that's there.) He makes them and himself popular beyond their wildest dreams. Lestat of course challenging humans and his kind alike to see him for what he really is. He's not pretending, he says, he's real and he doesn't want anonymity anymore. Of course, I am not exactly sure why his band sounds like any of the heavy nu-metal/industrial sort of sound, but then I look around at the Goths in the audience and go, "Ah. Got it." Moving on...the story really does focus on Lestat's love of the limelight, with a weak subplot thrown in about Jesse from the Talamasca falling in love with Lestat after reading a journal of his, then seeking him out. After meeting up with our fanged friend in London, she follows him to Death Valley, for the first and only concert his band is giving. Basically she asks him to make her a vampire, but after showing her the brutality of kiling to exist, she gets cold feet and Lestat pretty much tells her to get bent, he ain't got time for this. (There is a flashback sequence of Jesse as a child in Maharet's mountain compound, but again, there is no point for it to be there, because it doesn't really make a damn bit of difference.) Lestat meets up with Marius. Droll bit of repartee, blah blah blah. Marius tells him that he has woken Akasha and that she is coming. Let's go back to London to a vampire haunt where Akasha watches the music videos of Lestat's band. Fellow vampires mutter some big-dick vampire talk about how they are going to kill Lestat at his concert, blah blah blah. Akasha, who even after being in a state of unconsciousness for two thousand years still manages to find the last living blacksmith who can fashion her breastplate and headdress, just burns the joint and the vamps within down. The best sequence in the film really is the concert sequence. It's gaudy, it's ostentatious, and it's exactly what one would expect from a rock star that thinks he's God. Huge outdoor concert, fire effects, huge screen TVs, towers of amps and speakers, and tons of screaming fans. I might add that Stuart Townsend is wearing a sheer mesh long-sleeved black shirt and that I think I went through a full body shudder. Moving on...anyway, vampires who pissed at Lestat revealing his true nature rush the stage. (Sidebar: One of the best things about this film was that they finally showed how vampires are supposed to move--quicker than the human eye can register, so quick that time seems to slow like molasses as they "walk." It's pretty damn cool.) But unfortunately it quickly descends into the sort of fight sequence that has been seen in very goddamn film since "The Matrix" came out. We. Get. It. Now. Quit. Akasha, of course, ruins the party, kidnaps Lestat, and Jesse meets up with Maharet, who takes her back to the mountain compound with a council of vampire elders. We have Armand, Pandora, Khayman, Mael, and Marius. But you know what? We never fucking know that until the credits!!!! They are never introduced, hell, they're in the film too late to start with, and they barely have dialogue. Back to Akasha and Lestat. There's some vampire making out, some bullshit badly accented dialogue coming from Aaliayah about Lestat's ego, and Stuart Townsend does what he does best: looks hot. And pale. Anyway, Akasha says she's got a grudge to settle and off they go to the mountain compound. Swift Story Resolution Alert: The end of the film was rushed. Lestat and Akasha show up, the other vampires challenge her, blah blah blah. Akasha orders Lestat to drain Jesse, he does, blah blah blah. And apparently, this Queen vampire who turn you into toast by just gesturing her fingers, can be killed when a vein is open. That's right, folks, they just have to drain her to death. Admittedly this might be a hard thing to do since she doesn't play well with others, but c'mon! Anyway, the vampires attack her and Maharet takes Akasha's life into herself so that she can be the One True Vampire Mother. *sigh* The film ends with Lestat making Jesse into a vampire and her saying goodbye to her Talamasca buddies.

So, good things: the make-up, the clothes, the way they made the vampires move, the teeth, and of course, Stuart Townsend.

Bad things: long build-up to a story that makes very little sense--one being was we never get a proper reason why Akasha's so bloodthirsty. In the book, we do, but in the movie they reduce to a simplistic moronic reason that would have even the biggest Anne Rice in spastic fits. "The Matrix"-like fight sequence, Aaliyah's bad accent (it's really a shame that this was one of her last films as it does not do her justice in terms of her acting abilities), and the fact the dude from Korn (!!!!) is Lestat's singing voice.

I give a C+. I mean, I'll see it again, but probably with headphones, a pack of smokes, a flask of liquor, and the overwhelming urge to have Stuart Townsend spank me.
 
 
Burning Man
01:12 / 22.02.02
From what I understand, this movie was direct to video until Aaliyah died, then someone trying to make one last buck off of her, decided to release this as a full feature. Maybe I'll see it when it finally gets back to video, that way I can turn it off if its boring.

Burning Man
 
 
Our Lady of The Two Towers
13:39 / 22.02.02
I'd be surprised if it makes much of a splash over here, I thought it hadgone straight to video already. It's a real shame as I watched the first one again the other night and really liked it.

It sounds far too 'bad goth' for me.
 
 
Kali, Queen of Kitteh
16:18 / 24.02.02
It wouldn't be your imagination.

So far all the reviews I've read pretty much agree with me. I mean, the entire thing was shot in Australia and from what I understand, the budget wasn't that impressive.

Still, I go with the good points: make-up, movement, and Stuart Townsend.
 
 
Ganesh
17:02 / 24.02.02
Sounds like it looks nice, anyway. What happened to the ol' homoerotic androgyny bit, though? From your account, it all sounds a bit... well, heterosexual. With fangs.
 
 
Elijah, Freelance Rabbi
20:58 / 25.02.02
oh yeah like a major motion picture would have a multi page anal sex sequecne--oh wait that was in armand...
but yes, Interview showed the homoeroticism of the whole we dont really have sex, we just bite each other thing

but really, ill see it, and hate it, but laugh the whola way through

good to see ya Kali
 
 
Kali, Queen of Kitteh
12:12 / 26.02.02
The closest we get to any sort of homoeroticism is when Marius "makes" Lestat, as it were. Lots of passionate sighing.
 
 
Ganesh
12:14 / 26.02.02
Pfft. Ann Rice will be turning in her coffin...
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
12:52 / 26.02.02
How come I'd never even heard of this till now? (tho somehow I doubt I'll be rushing off to see it.)
 
 
Ganesh
14:27 / 26.02.02
quote:Originally posted by Mordant C@rnival:
How come I'd never even heard of this till now?


Reptilian conspiracy. The usual.
 
 
Kali, Queen of Kitteh
14:46 / 26.02.02
quote:Originally posted by Mordant C@rnival:
How come I'd never even heard of this till now? (tho somehow I doubt I'll be rushing off to see it.)


Well, it's not like you're missing a whole lot. Undoubtedly it will get panned as being one of the worst movies ever made, and as I've said before, it really is only for the morbidly curious and Anne Rice fans.

There's been some flak I understand about Aaliyah having been cast as Akasha. Apparently Anne Rice fans were up in arms because in the book Akasha is clearly white, but director Michael Rymer lobbied hard for Aaliyah, saying that "2000-year-old Egyptian queens do not look like Elizabeth Taylor." So we have Aaliyah fans calling Rice fans rascist, blah blah blah. Personally I don't care. White or black, I don't think you have to be a rocket scientist to do what Aaliyah does in the role: slink, growl, pose, and hiss. In short, act like a cat.

[ 26-02-2002: Message edited by: Kali ]
 
 
Ganesh
14:55 / 26.02.02
Actually dying was one method-acting step too far, though...
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
15:41 / 26.02.02
A nu-goffick band would a really, really stupid way of publicising your vampiric nature anyhow. The chorus of "yerr-RIGHT!" would be all the way off the Richter scale.
 
 
Elijah, Freelance Rabbi
14:45 / 28.02.02
so i saw it, and it seems to me that lestat rose and then became the lead singer for Sisters Of Mercy, but with better hair.

(yes that is the synopsis i am giving to friends who want to know what its about)
 
 
Lurid Archive
15:07 / 28.02.02
Bloody hell! They've filmed an Anne Rice novel that isn't filled with homoerotiscism? What next? The atheists version of the bible?

This is becoming all too common in cinema though. Apparently (I haven't seen the films) both Alan Turing in Enigma and John Nash in The Beautiful Mind are portrayed as solid, red blooded heteros. God forbid that they might be gay.
 
 
Ganesh
15:12 / 28.02.02
Why spoil a nice tale of brilliant scientists with that... dirtiness? It's all so unnecessary...
 
 
Kali, Queen of Kitteh
23:48 / 28.02.02
quote:Originally posted by Elijah Non Grata:
so i saw it, and it seems to me that lestat rose and then became the lead singer for Sisters Of Mercy, but with better hair.



Don't forget he had a better wardrobe--and tch my sainted tongue for saying this--and was pots load better looking than Andrew Eldritch.

MmmmHmmm..I do loves to look at some Stuart Townsend...
 
 
The Monkey
00:27 / 01.03.02
Actually, Ganesh, its looks like they took the "dirtiness" out of Enigma by just leaving Alan Matheson Turing out of the plot...anyway, the IMDB thingy makes me think the film has fuck all to do with code-breaking: it's a "romantic thriller."

Derek Jacobi did an excellent film about Turing, but I don't recall the name.
 
 
Hieronymus
03:02 / 01.03.02
Breaking the Code I think.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
22:08 / 03.03.02
quote:Originally posted by [stupid, stupid monkeys]:
Actually, Ganesh, its looks like they took the "dirtiness" out of Enigma by just leaving Alan Matheson Turing out of the plot...


Yeesh. Not sure what's worse: blatant het-brushing out of history, or spurious post-mortem beard.
 
 
The Monkey
22:23 / 03.03.02
Somehow, I think using Bletchley Park as a nominal background for yet another "romantic thriller" is a bit crap in and of itself.

"Our chiselled hero performs a vital role in the war effort by decrypting Nazi codes, but he's decided to sod that and go off looking for his missing bit of squeeze."

And Alan Turing is one of my heroes, so it makes me all bristly.

And the other half of het-brushing in fictional and historical narratives is the implicit [sometimes] explicit link between evil and non-hetero, non-vanilla sex and sexuality.
 
 
Tamayyurt
23:00 / 03.03.02
Saw this. And I have to major complaints to add to Kali's. 1)That voice over was horrible! 2) Would it have killed Lestat's manager to have fed him a good looking boy every now and again.

I was happy with it, though. I went in knowing the book was too complicated to be made into a decent movie so I just went for the cheap thrill.
 
 
Kali, Queen of Kitteh
22:51 / 05.03.02
Oh yeah, and is it ever a cheap thrill. That was why, impulsivelad, one of my major complaints that Lestat was too predatory. I read all the time about some hapless evil hot boy getting his and I would've paid good money (though, admittedly I see this film for free) to see that, you bet.

Glad to hear I wasn't the only one going, "What the--????"
 
 
Jackie Susann
11:00 / 09.04.02
I'm a huge Aaliyah fan, so I saw this the day it came out in Melbourne. My God it's bad; like, unbelievably bad. It's just impossible to understand why they made a movie like this - it isn't sexy, it doesn't look good, it doesn't make sense, it's not exciting, it's not believable, and apart from Aaliyah, the actors are butt ugly (no, I don't understand the Lestat guy's supposed appeal). Aaliyah is great, apart from her voice, but all that means is she moves nicely.

Did the story actually make sense in the book? I mean, was there an actual story in the book?
 
 
Our Lady of The Two Towers
11:30 / 09.04.02
2 very long stories in 2 very long books. Not surprising if it suffers somewhat when turned into a film.
 
 
Baz Auckland
21:09 / 09.04.02
I've yet to see the movie, but I remember the worst part of the book being the killing of the Queen:

Okay, let's build up that SHE'S COMING TO KILL US for 2 books... and then, when she comes, we'll kill her in 1/2 a page, so the reader has to flip back a couple times going 'what happened? was that it?'
 
  
Add Your Reply