|
|
You know, there's one thing I don't like about this whole mess.
Gaiman, and effectively Marvel, hung around, waiting for McFarlane to make the first move.
And McFarlane made the move and now they're sueing.
Not only is it cheaper to defend then prosecute (defence depending on the way things are, opposed to prosecuting to prove the way things were supposively meant to be) But Neil is teaming up with Marvel comics, who, up until 16 months ago, were bringing out some of the worst comics recognised to humanity.
McFarlane, once upon a time, bucked the trend in a big way, all credit to hgim, and vital for the comics industry, and now that Marvel are well known again, they're taking sides in a very dubiously decided micro-war, and, well, it's just so PREDICTABLE.
I hope Gaiman wins, if what he says is true, but I really REALLY hope he loses if he's lying out of his ass. Good PR does not make for an honest version of events, and doing so to influence how history is recorded, despite the actual TRUTH, is not an honourable path to follow.
I just hope this isn't a way for Marvel to get their own back, 'cause that would mean that Marvel haven't actually learnt anything at all. |
|
|