|
|
I think it is fair to say that POWERS is not as good as Top Ten, but then Bendis is not Moore, he has not been in comics as long. Furthermore, Top Ten focuses a lot on the powers of the characters, where as in POWERS the main characters have no powers. Would Top Ten be as good if Sarge was not a super-dog?
Is POWERS better than Swamp Thing? I think so, if only in terms of atmosphere and enviroment. Whereas Moore in Swamp Thing was working within an pre-existing world, Bendis forged his on his own. Bendis has made a distinct effort to flesh out his little creation and #13 shows just how well he can do that. POWERS 13 is like a 22 page magizine about people with super powers. There are fake adds and all that which you would expect if Vouge or Vanity Fair fell into a world with super heroes.
I think it is fair to compare POWERS with Watchmen, and I think POWERS falls behind here. One part of this is because Watchmen was a miniseris with a long but initially defined plot whereas POWER is a ongoing mag which is just getting its feet off the ground. I do like Oeming's art more than Gibbons however.
quinine92001: I think your critism is valid, I have the same feelings re: the masquerade plot line.
I guess I am just trying to say that POWERS is better than most comic books out there and that more people should look into it. #13 esp was an incredibly innovative look at how to build a universe.
-Jesse |
|
|