|
|
okay, in summary -- "here are some artists liefeld likes... oh, and isn't quesada a stupid doo-doo head?"
you know, i really try not to jump on any "lets bash ___ " bandwagons. i can honestly say i have seen potential in liefeld's work, even if he has turned out to be, in my opinion, the laziest comic artist i've seen actually get published.
now i really think he deserves all the flak he has gotten. what's with this arrogant (is that the right word, or is it "ignorant" (or is it "moronic")) little shit? encouraging up-and-coming artists is a good thing, but notice how those he lists seem to be significantly influenced by the old liefeld style. "this copiel guy uses lots of scratchy lines-- now that's drawing!" jesus christ...
and he brings up greg horn and refers to his work as "captivating"... i don't deny this guy has great technical skill, but what i've seen of his work is so damn bland. like alex ross. these guys can do marvelously photo-realistic paintings that have absolutely no impact -- no drama, no energy, poor composition... that's the great tragedy of so many artists.
i don't want to be too harsh on horn and ross, they're still working and have room to grow. but a lot of recent "hot" artists, like liefeld, are all of a sudden gushed over as soon as they hit the scene, and they seem to decide that this means they are good enough as they are. "i am a Good Artist. therefore the work i do is Good Art." then they get lazy, just churning out the same stuff over and over, never bothering to put in the effort to keep learning, keep growing, and actually becoming interesting artists.
ack. |
|
|