|
|
I thought it was fantastic. Yeah, of course it didn't get summed up neatly, or at all in fact, but I think that that was to be expected from the start. Even if it had been possible to come up with a neat and "satisfying" ending I think that wrapping the book up that way would have undermined a lot of what had gone before. Often this method of leaving things hanging is used as a cop-out for a creatively bankrupt author who can't figure out an ending but in House of Leaves I genuinely don't think that that was the case.
That aside, I loved the footnotes and the turning upside down and the nods to Borges and Calvino in a kind of "pop" format that really worked - all mixed in with a genuinely creepy horror story of the kind that I don't normally tend to read.
That's not to say that it was perfect of course; although it's a while since I read it I seem to remember moments when it sagged and directions that the book took (while not taking others), where, with hindsight, I wish it had gone the other way. Still, even with those caveats, it's a huge achievement and quite easily succeeds in avoiding being merely gimmicky. On the other hand, despite all that, I have to say that I'm not too keen to rush into his next book which, from the descriptions, sounds worryingly as though he has had to find a new way to capture people's attention in the same way as before. If you see what I mean. |
|
|