BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Voracious?

 
 
Fist Fun
12:16 / 31.12.01
How many books did you read this year? How many in an average year? Have there been any times when you have ready more or less than usual?
Just wondering, would like to compare my experiences with yours.
 
 
Ethan Hawke
12:32 / 31.12.01
I don't know about how many books I read a year, but this week I finished:

"Motherless Brooklyn" - Johnathan Lethem - very enjoyable, especially considering I can visualize a lot of the locations now.

"Against the Grain" - J.K. Huysmans (in translation) - oddly preoccupied with religious matters

"The Decadent Cookbook" - Medlar Lucan and Durian Grey - pleasant slight diversion

"The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception in a more that human world" - David Abram - investigates the language and myth of "primitive" people through the lens of 20th century phenomenology. Interesting investigation but falls too much into the Rousseauist trap of lionizing "natural" man.

"Lucifer's Legacy" - book about asymetry in the natural world. Avoid. Plagiazrizes full p-graphs from Martin Gardner's "The Ambidextrous Universe." Mediocre-to-bad science writing.

Yeah, I think you can consider me voracious.
 
 
Tom Coates
13:06 / 31.12.01
I'd probably read about ten books this year - which is pretty dismal, actually - until Christmas. And since then I've read about six. Which is great.

I think that a well-informed person with a little time to space should probably be gettin through a book every couple of weeks...
 
 
Cherry Bomb
13:13 / 31.12.01
In general I read several books a month. Sometimes more sometimes less but I'm pretty much an addict.

Right now I'm reading "Let it Blurt: The Story of Lester Bangs, America's Greatest Rock Critic," which I got for Christmas. And today I'm hustling down to Barnes & Nobel to pick up "No Logo" (if it's in which hopefully it will be).


Right after September 11 I couldn't read books for about six weeks. I just was like unable to pull my head out of the newspaper or magazines. But now I'm back to my old tricks.

There's no way I could even guess how many books I've read this year, but I'm sure the number is somewhere between 70 - 170.
 
 
Fist Fun
13:51 / 31.12.01
Well, I worked out that I have read about 30 this past year including 5 during my week long Christmas break. Which doesn't really seem much. Maybe I should take up speed reading.
I have always considered myself reasonably well-read, but I am starting to shrink in my own estimation. Damn.
 
 
The Return Of Rothkoid
19:50 / 01.01.02
I used to keep a list of them, but realised that was a bit crap, so stopped. But I'd estimate that I've read something like 40-50 novels this year, and an assortment of other things, too. And no, I never feel like I've read enough stuff, either. Especially given that I've had almost two months off and have read fuck all in that time.
 
 
The Return Of Rothkoid
10:12 / 02.01.02
There is that famous Elle MacPherson quote where she said that she doesn't read books (or do I mean novels? Oh, the intrigue!) because she didn't believe in reading anything she hadn't written.

I recall reading somewhere that the average person in the western world reads 1-2 novels per year and was kinda freaked out. I mean, unless they're all reading Infinite Jest or some other such tome, that's a pretty low number, innit? Or has novel reading degenerated that much, really? Whatever the case, if that's the average, going by the discussions that crop up here, people around here must be fucking superhuman.
 
 
DaveBCooper
10:23 / 02.01.02
I know what you mean : on holiday a few years ago, I overheard someone say “Oh yes, I LOVE to read. But not books.”

I think I heard the one or two books a year statistic as well. And if that’s the average, it must mean that some people aren’t reading any at all; consider me freaked out by this idea, too.

DBC
 
 
Our Lady of The Two Towers
14:41 / 02.01.02
I was going to make the 'I've only read one book this year!' joke but then I realised you posted your message on 31st December. Bugger.

I would guestimate I've read about 60-70 book books last year, with maybe 20 or so more if you include graphic novels and the like.
 
 
Opalfruit
08:24 / 04.01.02
Asking me for the quantity of books I read? Christ. Erm. Some, maybe more. Erm. It's easier to tell you how many I've read in the past week, lets see. "The Amber Spy Glass" "Happy Policeman" "The Book of Three" and I've just started "Flashman and the Redskins".

So I round it down to 2 a week, times by 52 and that's..... shit 104 approx. Must read less fiction, read books about new stuff that's what I should do....
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
08:42 / 04.01.02
I'd say generally between one and three a week, which is a fuck of a lot, until you consider that I DO read a hell of a lot of shit (usually when I'm working nights, cos in between the getting pissed and sleeping I tend to forget stuff, therefore for those weeks I try to pick something "sleazy, cheesy and easy" as a friend of mine would say).
Actual decent, quality books I would have no qualms in recommending to people, or would understand why other people liked them even if I thought they were poo... probably about twenty to thirty. Having said that, I've been slowly getting through "Moby Dick" for most of the year, and have now comprehensively crippled that worthy effort by starting Herodotus' "Histories", which is fucking ace, but not exactly a page-turner when you're tired.
And in terms of the whole "average year" thing, I read less decent stuff now than I used to, for the simple reason that I work less days and closer to home than I used to, hence less time on buses (other than sitting on the toilet or lying in bed, the BEST reading time there is).
 
 
mondo a-go-go
08:42 / 04.01.02
how does anyone find the time to read so many books, espesh when you're someone like rothkoid who not only finds time to read dozens of books, but also to see loads of films and read pages and pages online, and still maintain a social life? i can't do it.

since i've been going out a lot more i've read less. since moving into a flat with a vcr i've read less. and now that my office is 15mins on the bus, i don't read while commuting either. the only time i read books, as opposed to comics and newspapers which i read whilst watching videos, is in the bath. which ruins the books, and also limits me to cheap small paperbacks that i'm less likely to drop....
 
 
No star here laces
08:42 / 04.01.02
See the thing about books is that they're ideal for filling in the gaps between doing stuff. I read mainly on the bus, the toilet, in lunch hour and before falling asleep (when sex isn't filling that slot). I can get through 3 novels a week reading exclusively in those times.

Buuuut - does anyone have any tips on non-fiction reading? When I start a novel, I have to finish it, and as soon as possible. But non-fiction takes literally months, even for short stuff, and usually gets abandoned halfway. Is that just terminal dilletantism, or is there a secret to it?
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
08:42 / 04.01.02
I get that too... I find it depends on what kind of non-fiction, and whether you can imagine it as a movie in your head... good biographies are easy. Stuff that involves lots of figures, cross-referencing etc... I have no idea. Actually, stuff that involves too much knowledge of geography always loses me, too. (I have this real thing about polar exploration- and no, I didn't see that thing on telly this week- but I find books on it really hard to follow... once they GET to whichever pole they're visiting, it's cool, it becomes a human story, but there's always at least 50 or 60 pages of travelling... and I can't picture any of it.)
 
 
The Return Of Rothkoid
10:46 / 04.01.02
I honestly think it's just a matter of persisting with it. I know that when I was at university, I was much more attuned to academic/non-fiction writing - it's only since I've been out that it's become a bit of a struggle to get through some of the books - and so I figure that it's just that I've slipped out of that mindset. Which is a compelling argument for reading more non-fiction, and probably one I'll ignore.
 
 
Fist Fun
11:02 / 04.01.02
quote:
Kooky wrote:
how does anyone find the time to read so many books


I ask myself the same question. I love reading, but there is just so much else that I love as well. Work five days a week, go out, see people, study, spend time on hobbies, housework. I could never see me getting through much more than a book or so a fortnight.
 
 
Ethan Hawke
11:10 / 04.01.02
I've actually been reading far more non-fiction than fiction lately, and I have indeed noticed it takes much longer to get through than a similarly-lengthed novel. I think there are three reasons for this (a) non-fiction writers, are, writ-large, less concerned with a readable style than most fiction writers and more concerned with densely packing information about their chosen subjects in. Naturally, there are some very fine non-fiction stylists out there, but once you get below say, the first tier of science writers the style tends to get pretty bad. (B) I usually pick non-fiction on subjects I am an amatuer at. Therefor there is more to pick up, more to learn as you go along. Whereas, with most novels, you know how a novel operates and if you've read enough you can fill in the gaps of where it is going. So they're quicker to read. (C) Non-fiction is usually divided into many chapters which offer fine stopping placaes. Fiction, however, if it is divided into chapters, tends to end on a note of suspense or discovery and this makes the reader eager to push on.

As for persisting in reading non-fiction, books of a specialist nature are always going to be difficult for the non-academic to wade through and still understand. I don't think there is any shame in getting halfway through a quantum physics book or "theory" book and putting it down because it presupposes knowledge one doesn't have yet.
 
 
Kit-Cat Club
11:31 / 04.01.02
I probably average about a book a week, though it varies - sometimes I go through one a day (e.g. when unemployed), sometimes I get stuck on something for a couple of weeks.

I think I read about the same amount of fiction and non-fiction, though despite my good intentions most of the non-fiction is history or historical biography - which I'm interested in anyway and can rip through if it's well-written and engaging (and often has the advantage of having a narrative basis - not true of philosophy, for example). Books which I try to read because I think I ought to (classified in my mind as 'improving books') take a lot longer, because at bottom I'm just not as interested in the subject.
 
 
ephemerat
07:38 / 07.01.02
I always used to average 2 books a week, for year after year, from the age of nine. Last 16 months this tailed off considerably - I probably only managed around 20-30 books last year - hope to improve this standing and stop feeling like I've lost part of my brain.

Oh, and all this stuff about making time to read is nowt but damned foolishness - reading makes the time itself. It's not some simple and enjoyable hobby - it's a horrific clawing addiction that dominates your life and leaves you shaking and howling for more text.

Watch yourselves out there, kittlings. The Game Cat knows.
 
 
sleazenation
07:44 / 07.01.02
These days i'm reading fewer and fewer novels and spending more time reading non-fiction stuff that i can use either in nonfiction articles etc i am writing or that i can twist to my own fictional ends.
 
  
Add Your Reply