BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Barbelith 2010

 
  

Page: (1)2

 
 
deja_vroom
14:55 / 21.08.09
Hi, Tom.

This is a tentative response to your question If you had access to this domain name, and the large—if slightly disconnected and maybe slightly disintegrating—community of people who have been here over the years, what would you want to do with it?


Given all the experience you have accrued in interweb-related issues in the past years, please take a look at what's laid out below and tell me if you think it has any potential in it.


This is old history, but for a short period of time there was a Barbelith branch which was quite the cool thing: It was called Barbelith Globalwatch. It was basically a collective blog where 'lithers could upload text & pictures. It didn't last long, and the only traces it left are this thread (please forgive the excess of exclamation marks: We were young & full of beans), and this wiki page. (btw, grant, are you still out here?).

I remember exchanging some PMs with you at the time. You oversaw the development of the thing and was always supportive of it. Good times were had by all.

Now, the talk in the last days converged more and more to focus on the possibilities of making Barbelith an actually profitable venture, at least profitable enough to justify the amount of time that you would have to invest in it. Ideally it would have to be something that would not de-characterize Barbelith to the extent that it could not be recognized as such anymore. With this model I'm sketching, the board would still survive and people would continue to enjoy it. But at the same time we would have an external monetizable framework, which would be something along the lines of Barbelith Globalwatch:

The site's front page, the feature that from now on people (who didn't know about Barbelith previsouly) would associate with it, would be of a news site. Of course all the old fogeys would laugh secretly knowing that the forum is really where all the fun & the learning is at. Think of it as if the whole endeavour were a train: The forum would be the dining car where people go to chat, while the locomotive - the news site, where work is done and bills are paid - keeps chugging along, dragging the dining car behind it.

At this point, three questions arise:

a) What is the distinguishable feature that Barbelith-flavored news would need to have in order to be deemed interesting/relevant enough to interest someone to invest in it;

b) How can this concept be sold to someone who might be able to fund this; and

c) How can we obtain a reliable input of material from the members

A) Countercultural news, mostly - stories with social interest. In theory, almost each forum would be able to provide related stories: Laboratory -> Science news, Switchboard -> political news etc. I'll expand on b), below:

B) I'd try and look for partnerships with NGOs.

There's some lists of worldwide NGOs here and here. Lack of time prevents me from going through the whole list, but you will notice that the following (incomplete) list of NGO areas of interest (which I found in one of the links) overlaps nicely with some themes that were very dear to Barbelith:

Children & Youth / Communications / Disaster Relief / Drug Abuse / Education / Environment / Human Rights / Race Relations / Natural Resources & Energy / Peace & Security / Religion / Refugees / Science & Technology / Status of Women.

NGOs get serious money from stinking rich organizations, and they're always trying to expand their networks. I know about them only tangentially, but I also know that Coca-Cola would be willing to shill out US$50.000/year to sponsor an NGO that... picks up empty soda cans and gives them proper disposal, something like that (a friend of mine is working with that). That's not a lot of money, but ideally we could pool some NGOs together for this, and thus increase revenue.

This is just a hasty example of something that, on first look, you wouldn't think someone would be willing to give that type of money to. And yet it happens. I think Barbelith has way more goods to offer than that. Do you think that it would be possible to pool some interested NGOS into this deal, and so to get some money to trickle down this way?

I'm talking about seeing if here's an intersection of interests here, and whether certain fora could provide reporters for topics that certain NGOs would like to get access to/see publicized.

If certain members of the Switchboard have a passion for gender-related issues - say, violence against women - it would only come naturally that in their normal lives they would already be aware of developments/news in their little corners of the world pertaining to those matters. From that to posting about that on Barbelith wouldn't be too much trouble. We had geeks from an ample spectrum of colors, which could be quite vocal with their interests/points of view. This leads to the last question:

C) Barbelith members didn't need to be goaded into creating things. We have a whole forum where people used to flex their creative muscles in writing, photography, drawing. They used to do that for free, but times have changed, there was a war, all that sour businees with the buffalos etc.- things are different now.

While I think that there's no real money for the individuals who would be providing the content, maybe there are other incentives. Contribute with a story and, if it is rated good enough, if it generates a certain amount of clicks, you get a book, or some sort of small, but tangible token of appreciation (booksbooksbooks; ok, tickets for stuffs, go crazy). Of course it's prety cool to be featured prominently in the first page of the site with your story - do you remember when we used to have Barbelith Reviews on the front page? There was some good content right there.

I also think there's some accessory money to be made if we can get some of the brilliant artists that have populated the board to come up with designs for apparel, also (Where's Nelson Evergreen these days?). All the proceeds would go towards funding Barbelith.

(Or, fuck me, I could have saved all the above and just said "We would be like Disinfo.com, which is a news site, which has a board, and which sells apparel. Only, you know, sexier. (Their "about us" info is very interesting in this regard)

That's all I got. It's sketchy, it has a ton of issues to be resolved, but I think that's how it would have to begin anyway, right? Only thing I need is the perspective of someone who really works with this type of thing - you, Tom - to see if this is even remotely feasible/interesting, because I don't really know much about that end.

The thread is not intended to be answered by Tom only, of course. The input of concerned/knowledgeable members is highly sought.

I hope that, if none of the above is what Barbelith needs, this post can clarify this issue, if only by providing a good idea of where *not* to go.
 
 
deja_vroom
15:20 / 21.08.09
I added a bit of clarification but have no idea when the change is gonna appear. This is it:

US$50.000/year is not a lot - and this is money given to an NGO, not to Barbelith directly. So ideally we would need a pool of NGOs to get interested in this, and hope that, getting a sufficiently high number of those, we would be able to increase revenue.
 
 
grant
17:57 / 21.08.09
I'm here!

The wiki is essentially frozen in time because of an enormous number of spam user accounts - I had a certain amount of power (mainly to create sysops out of other users), but not the power to actually delete a user account, and was eventually overwhelmed. So rather than let the vandalism take over, I froze everything.
 
 
grant
18:01 / 21.08.09
Oh,dear.

Well, almost everything. Apparently some rather good annotations have been lost....
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
22:58 / 21.08.09
I know it's a bit offtopic, so apologies for that, but, Deja_Vroom, I'm quite confused. If you were the Deja Vroom (or the Imperator de Jade) who was PMing Tom in 2003, in what sense are you not the Deja Vroom (or Imperator de Jade) who was telling people that they couldn't understand the objective greatness of The Passion of the Christ because they were gay in 2004? This isn't some attempt to catch you out, just genuine curiosity. Shared suit? Selective disowning of embarrassing past?
 
 
deja_vroom
11:47 / 22.08.09
I'm surprised - almost to the brink of concern, really, that you could be so alien to the concept of personal growth & change. This is way more than just "a bit offtopic", so if you really must know (I don't think you really must know), there's always PMing.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
12:18 / 22.08.09
Not an alien concept at all, D_V. If you just mean that you don't feel that you are the person any more who went bonkers about The Passion of the Christ, but you're still the person who feels that it would be good to have a Barbelith Newsblog, that's fine; I just didn't want to make assumptions. So, if by, for example:

the person who wrote those misguided posts is no longer here, and left no address

you mean something like "I don't feel able to ascribe this behaviour to anything that I recognise as me any more", that's totally cool - although it's best, I find, to learn from one's mistakes rather than refusing to admit even to oneself that they were one's mistakes. That's the kind of approach to personal growth that has led to my commitment to saying ONLY NICE THINGS.

Like I say, this isn't an attempt to entrap you or anything like that - it's simple and sincere curiosity, and there's no need to be so defensive - you're in a safe place, here. Also, it's not wholly offtopic - I'm trying to work out whether the person who posted in the Globalwatch thread was you, or somebody else logged in as user 471, which changes my understanding of your relationship to this admittedly somewhat quixotic (Barbelith word of the week!) proposition. Also, with your indulgence, my experience with old, new or totally different Jade by PM has been that it's been a conduit for the use of a conversational tone which was, let's say, not totally NICE.

So, if you just mean "my God, I was so dumb back then. I can't even stand to think that I could have said that stuff", no problem - I totally get you. I do appreciate your concern for me, though, although I think I'm OK, on the whole.
 
 
deja_vroom
15:03 / 22.08.09
I see it as an exercise in futility to answer you about topics you already know, but a strange to futility and idle snark you aren't, so:

So, if you just mean "my God, I was so dumb back then. I can't even stand to think that I could have said that stuff", no problem
you mean something like "I am so deeply ashamed of my previous, douchey behaviour that I don't feel able to ascribe it to anything that I recognise as me any more"

It certainly could have been said in a nicer way, but no one wants you to strain a tendon, nor anything, right? Some people were dumb, some people are NICE PEOPLE...

although it's best, I find, to learn from one's mistakes rather than refusing to admit even to oneself that they were one's mistakes.

Ooh, how precious. Thanks for the sage grade advice, Haus. But I never refused to admit they were my mistakes. You read it wrong, in your eagerness to be a NICE PERSON. All I ever did was to disown those misguided views, interests, and argumentative tactics, and "disowning", by its very definition, needs some state/thing that you must have owned previously, in order to disown it. See? Is it clear enough for you now?

which changes my understanding of your relationship to this admittedly somewhat quixotic (Barbelith word of the week!) proposition.

Again, thanks for the help there, but the nature of my contribution had already occurred to me. I even mentioned, in the post, that it was more a sketch than anything else, and that it would need the input of knowledgeable people to see if "it was even remotely feasible/interesting". Sometimes some quips just don't pay the effort, Haus. People will point you to parts of their posts that you read wrong in your eagerness to be the reliable NICE PERSON we all know you to be, and you'll look not only like a NICE PERSON, but an incompetent one, and that's very sad.

my experience with old, new or totally different Jade by PM has been that it's been a conduit for the use of a conversational tone which was, let's say, not totally NICE.

No, no, sorry, wrong. Ever since I came back, we didn't exchange PMs, so... you can't really say that. If you're gonna keep doing this, at least open a new thread.

and no need to be defensive or cryptic about it

You misunderstand me. I'm just not feeding the NICE PEOPLE. I'm sure you'll understand.

I do appreciate your concern for me, though, although I think I'm OK, on the whole.

To the brink of concern, I said. Let's not get too carried away here. See my answer above re: eagerness to be a NICE PERSON.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
16:20 / 22.08.09
So, you weren't involved, but you weren't involved in the sense that a different and now disowned person was using not just the same login but also the same physical body as now-you are, and you therefore were by your lights not? Well, that answers my question. I'm sorry if my previous actions impelled you to feel insecure and so resulted in your defensive and evasive response. I think I get where you are coming from, and I certainly understand why you wo
uld want a new and blotless copybook. If you had only asked I could have got you a new login. Maybe a lesson for next time...
 
 
Shrug
16:29 / 22.08.09
ONLY NICE THREAD DERAILS.
 
 
deja_vroom
16:45 / 22.08.09
Hey, man, I'm as glad as you that it all worked out in the end. My nick doesn't say it, but I'm also into this whole niceness thing, it's very infectious. The way we handled this should be a lesson for the future, actually (if the board survives, that is).

I'm sorry if my previous actions impelled you to feel insecure and so resulted in your defensive and evasive response.

Since I had already explained my behavior as just not wanting to feed the NICE PERSON with a fondness for 5-year old threads that we know you are (you didn't have to have changed your nick - it was always very out in the open, really); and, since, even with all my - according to you - evasiveness and defensiveness, in the end you got there, and managed to grasp what I meant (I just don't see why you had to explain it in that convoluted, clumsy way, but anyway), then I don't see why you're making all that fuss re: said "evasiveness" (dude, this is me right here explaining things to you that you already knew - again; can't get much more unnecessarily drawn out than that...).

I don't want to not be nice and imply that you're being motivated by that base, low instinct of having the last word regardless of anything, but this, coupled with your (not very) timely advice about my need to learn from my mistakes... dude... are... are you trying to be my life critic, Haus? That would be a nicely unexpected turn of events.
 
 
Tuna Ghost: Pratt knot hero
17:28 / 22.08.09
OH MY GOD would you two knock it off. God it's worse than watching Haus go at it with Dead Megatron. Almost. Right, we all know this deja vroom character is the same as the one who went bonkers in the Passion thread, but I'm sure no one wants to really hold his feet to the fire for the things he wrote semi-anonymously five years ago when he was nineteen. I'm certainly not going to apologize for all the dumb shit I did when I was a teenager. Besides the episode with the school bus.

Moving on. I know fuck all about NGOs financing websites, but I've recently been looking into how similar (and not so similar) sites get funded, and this, while initially sounding retarded, may actually work. As far as financing. Haus pointed out in another thread that while money is an issue, it is not the issue, there's the time that Tom would have to spend doing the work. Even if he were fairly compensated, I get the impression working on Barbelith full-time is not part of Tom's professional life's plan, and also that he is unwilling to give the reigns to someone else. But who knows. Maybe if money started coming in he would feel differently.
 
 
deja_vroom
21:09 / 22.08.09
and this, while initially sounding retarded, may actually work.

So... you came to the conclusion that it wasn't retarded... by acually thinking better about it, or how did it went? You see how a guy could get confused...
 
 
HCE
14:06 / 23.08.09
So we now have two threads about how nothing is actually going to change. Good work.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
15:07 / 23.08.09
Cockroach race!

 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
15:15 / 23.08.09
Alas, poor Wellington. Finest cockroach in the British armed forces...
 
 
deja_vroom
15:40 / 23.08.09
The thread is all yours to play. The only person who can say anything of

interest to this thread is Tom, anyway, and I don't even know if he'll read

this.

Anyway, the idea is out. It may be of no value but, as with PBC's braveness in ending a situation which seemed to have ended all by itself (and - at the time - almost quite nicely. Almost quite nicely, now there's an improvement if I ever saw one) and with your attempts at niceness (I can't type it in caps anymore. It makes me think of a hysterical old woman screaming unexpectedly in the middle of a sentence), I think my Barbelith theme of the week will be that it's the intention that counts.

I hope you have fun finding ever more recondite, low ways to voice your

opinion of the current... situation. I'm certain I caught the gist of it a long time ago, and, I just don't have the time to waste on that type of thing. That would be a very silly thing to do. I mean, for it to hurt, I'd have to care about your opinion, and... again: Let's not get too carried away here.
 
 
deja_vroom
15:41 / 23.08.09
The thread is all yours to play. The only person who can say anything of interest to this thread is Tom, anyway, and I don't even know if he'll read this.

Anyway, the idea is out. It may be of no value but, as with PBC's braveness in ending a situation which seemed to have ended all by itself (and - at the time - almost quite nicely. Almost quite nicely, now there's an improvement if I ever saw one) and with your attempts at niceness (I can't type it in caps anymore. It makes me think of a hysterical old woman screaming unexpectedly in the middle of a sentence), I think my Barbelith theme of the week will be that it's the intention that counts.

I hope you have fun finding ever more recondite, low ways to voice your

opinion of the current... situation. I'm certain I caught the gist of it a long time ago, and, I just don't have the time to waste on that type of thing. That would be a very silly thing to do. I mean, for it to hurt, I'd have to care about your opinion, and... again: Let's not get too carried away here.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
16:02 / 23.08.09
My dear slightly disturbed chap, it's a still from Today We Live, Howard Hawkes' classic World War 1 melodrama. In it, Wellington was the first cockroach to be decorated for valour by the Allied armed forces, having been killed on a bombing raid. It's a long story, but a tale of courage.

That said, I think I'd be slightly more convinced by the demand that you are a totally different person now if you didn't behave and communicate in, essentially, exactly the same way as you did back in the days you insist that we shouldn't talk about. It may just be your grasp of the language, but you are coming across as pretty much exactly that guy.

Your proposal, of course, can stand on its own merits. I could tell you what I thought about it, but your response to me at the moment is at best slightly unhinged and at worst incomprehensible, so I'm not sure there would be a lot of point. And, as you say, you do not care about my opinion: didn't when you were convinced you could tell a transexual from the shape of their Adam's apple, don't now. A less violently antagonistic relationship with bright people might have served you well in the past, but we can probably put that possibility aside now - even after Damascene conversions, people don't actually change very much.
 
 
deja_vroom
17:20 / 23.08.09
Sigh.

[...]in the days you insist that we shouldn't talk about.

That's interesting - but what if the above had never happened? Talk all you want (after Wellington, I don't think there's anyplace else for this thread to go, anyway): I just can't promise an answer...

It may just be your grasp of the language, but you are coming across as pretty much exactly that guy.

Nah, don't worry, it's good enough to run in circles around you. Speaking of which, sorry for having to make you resort to structured paragraphs again. Please keep with the visuals, at least they're inventive.

--------------

A less violently antagonistic relationship with bright people might have served you well in the past, but we can probably put that possibility aside now

(As an idle aside, I find it ironic, of course, that if you had really meant the above, this would the straight-out most serious, kind thing I ever seen you say. I think I'll have to have a second Barbelith theme of the week - that sometimes, it's the results, not the intention, that counts. A bit contradictory, I know, but hey, I'm a complex guy...)
 
 
deja_vroom
17:21 / 23.08.09
without internet for a bit, too, but will make sure I'll keep checking here once in a while)
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
01:23 / 24.08.09
Hmm. I was coming back here to try to smooth things over, apologise for unnecessary levity, that sort of thing, but, reading back over it, I don't think I can. I mean, I don't think there's any way for me to speak to Deja V. that he won't take as some sort of psychic attack or attempt to score points - qv that fixated conviction that I had been watching his keyboard for the last six years and clearly thus know what he meant by his evasions of responsibility for his past actions - and respond to with what he imagines to be a counterattack. I think it's probably too late at this stage - the issues are just too deep and too old, as they probably are with toksik/Life Critic. No outstretched hand is going to lead to anything other than a fear response, and any attempt to conciliate will be seen as either a dolonic trick or a sign of weakness. And even if some temporary detente is achieved, the knife-edge balance of paranoia will limit its lease.

Ah, well. At least it serves as a handy metaphor for the dysfunction of the board (and one must wonder, when somebody says something like if certain members of the Switchboard have a passion for gender-related issues, what Switchboard they are reading, exactly; possibly a parallel Earth version where alas, persephone, GGM, deva et al are still there). Have fun running in circles, DV - although I think you meant "run rings around", your formulation is certainly a more accurate description of what's happening.
 
 
Quantum
08:49 / 24.08.09
As a brief anthropological aside on the use of language in this fascinating thread, ONLY NICE THINGS- 'Dolonic'? As in Dolon the Trojan? If you try and offer a virtual olive branch, he will think you are dressed as a wolf?
I think you mean that he will (incorrectly) see it as cunning deception, am I reading you right?

Deja, am I right (and is O.N.T. right) in thinking you did actually mean 'run rings around' or run circles around rather than "run in circles around"? As in, your linguistic skills are sufficient to run rings around O.N.T. and you did not mean that you can linguistically run in circles around him?
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
11:26 / 24.08.09
That's the bunny, Quants - although I was thinking not of his planned wolf impression (which I don't wholly buy) but of the way Odysseus and Diomedes led him to believe that they would let him live, without actually undertaking to do so, before snatching the football away at the last moment. Soft words concealing a murderous heart, sort of thing.
 
 
Quantum
14:02 / 24.08.09
Aha, that makes sense then, where taking-the-football-away-at-the-last-moment equals Diomedes-beheading-you-with-a-sharp-bronze-sword kinda thing. Your obscure classical allusions continue to educate me via google.
I did think that going on all fours in a wolfskin was a bit of a pony-and-trap plan, made of fail and unworthy of a sensible Trojan, I mean, who is that going to fool? Only a blind Greek, and tbh even some blind Greeks would notice, Diogenes for one, and most likely Homer- "Wait a frackin' minute! I wrote something like this once, Glaucus, check if that Wolf has sandals on and is walking funny!"
 
 
deja_vroom
14:19 / 24.08.09
Hey, Haus - "would a picture make everything right?" =)
 
 
deja_vroom
15:24 / 24.08.09
Hot damns, we're reaching something close to straight, serious speech here. This shows promise.

Let's see:

Hmm. I was coming back here to try to smooth things over, apologise for unnecessary levity, that sort of thing, but, reading back over it, I don't think I can.

If that eases things a bit, even the fact that you said you were going to do that is quite the thing already. It really, really is, considering. Fortunately I don't really have to choose between believing it or not, but it does look good on the screen.

No outstretched hand is going to lead to anything other than a fear response, and any attempt to conciliate will be seen as either a dolonic trick or a sign of weakness.

You don't have to fear that I will fear you, Bruce (sorry). I think you're mistaking me for someone who can't admit he has done misguided things in the past. That hypothetical someone would seem more prone to fall prey to those types of paranoid concerns, but hey.

Now this:

And even if some temporary detente is achieved, the knife-edge balance of paranoia will limit its lease.

and this:

Ah, well. At least it serves as a handy metaphor for the dysfunction of the board

Are both true (I like that you didn't specify whose paranoia). This must be addressed at some point - preferrably soon - preferrably in a separate thread. I think this is the right moment for me to say that I (of course) have no stake to claim on the board whatsoever, even if I wanted it (this was your playground waay before I even knew of its existence, so, you know...), but I would like to see it working well into the future.

I hope that, if that discussion happens, it can happen in the same level of this post - straight, serious, etc (we will need argumentative merit, too).

If the urge to ridicule becomes too strong and is given into, shit will go inevitably down. And at this stage, it would hardly matter if shit went down - but it we missed the chance to make that shit soar high up above, that would be very sad indeed (didn't some old dude say that satire was a negative thing to indulge in, given its destructive nature?)

and one must wonder, when somebody says something like if certain members of the Switchboard have a passion for gender-related issues, what Switchboard they are reading, exactly

This of course being just a small malapropism in a post typed with serious time constraints (as lately all of my posts have been); could have been clarified on the spot, of course - but again, it was too late for that type of tactful consideration, considering.
 
 
netbanshee
21:10 / 24.08.09
I wouldn't mind unpacking some of what's been mentioned in here and the other thread if we can all agree that this should be the topic at hand. Regardless of whether or not the discussion it's a wasted effort in the long-run, it's still more constructive than the distractions. You need the idea before the money in most cases, specially on those internetz.

This setup seems a lot like AppleInsider. The forum is the core of the discussion, vetting and interest, but the front page encapsulates topics of discussion into relevant news items. News items then have an accompanying thread that further the discussion. I find the format useful and have been reading that site here and there for a number of years.

Here are some other things I find useful:
- incoming rss feeds into the site
- rss feeds to follow along with topics
- sharing tools - ways to post information onto other sites we use easily

Anyone feel like offering sites that have features that you like?
 
 
Dead Megatron
02:16 / 25.08.09
OH MY GOD would you two knock it off. God it's worse than watching Haus go at it with Dead Megatron.

I just realized I've become Barbelith's special version of Godwin's law.
 
 
HCE
00:12 / 26.08.09
Because you're ... like Hitler?
 
 
Eek! A Freek!
12:11 / 26.08.09
Because you're ... like Hitler?

That's a bit harsh. Even if he can't produce a valid US birth certificate...
 
 
Dead Megatron
13:01 / 26.08.09
I come from no country. I'm a Nation of Me*






* which is a totalitarian dictatorship engulfed in a civil war, but with beaches and piña coladas**





** I'd prefer to say "caipirinhas" in that bad joke, but I'm not sure how many of you people are familiar with it.
 
 
HCE
14:43 / 26.08.09
I'm not saying he's like Hitler! I'm asking in what way he's Godwin's Law.

I know what caipirinhas are. I make an excellent variation on them, in fact. Delicious, I wish I could have one right now. It's been humid lately.
 
 
Dead Megatron
16:59 / 26.08.09
I'm Barbelith's Godwin Law because, given enough time, any useless, unnecessary, sarcasm-based discussion on Barbelith* will prompt someone to compare it to any of the old and otherwise long forgotten DM vs Haus arguments, which, quite frankly, not even DM can stand anymore, thus rendering everything even more moot than before, if that's possible. Just like calling someone a Nazi...


Now, ask me if I care, though.



* which, unsurprisingly, will most probably have Haus as the initiator of at least one of the willing participants.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
17:12 / 26.08.09
Steady on, now, darling Megatron. We're trying to be nice and calm. No need to try to start a fight. (Although I suppose that was something else that Hitler did...)
 
  

Page: (1)2

 
  
Add Your Reply