|
|
Despite the wrenching effect it had on me, I too loved this movie, and am looking forward to seeing it again on DVD.
One of the criticisms I keep reading of the film (and presumably among the reasons that it didn't receive a best picture nomination) is that other than Mickey Rourke's performance, the movie was cliched. Perhaps I'm misunderstanding the word cliche, but I understood it to mean an element that had been used so many times - be it a character, a phrase, a camera shot - that it ceased to have meaning. To my mind that doesn't apply to The Wrestler. For example, the scene with the daughter at the seafront didn't feel like it was just there because these sorts of films have to have a tearful reconciliation blah de blah. It felt honest and purposeful. Cliches can be reinvigorated, if the person using them understands their meaning and power, and that's what I felt was happening in The Wrestler. That seemed to me how something as hokey and familiar as the opening riff to an 80s rock song can become a genuinely moving moment.
So I'd be curious to hear from any posters who felt that it failed to - er - [i]breathe new life[/i] into cliches and was simply a regurgitation.
Also, all other awards aside, it totally should have won for best cinematography, because at times it felt nigh on unbearably intimate. |
|
|