|
|
The Johnny Cash "Hurt" is an interesting one, because it proposes the principle of sameness, which I think is one of the two ways you can do covers. The Cash cover succeeds because Cash is better at inhabiting the space occupied by the voice Trent Reznor sought to create. It's simply easier to see Cash as a man with an empire of dust, basically. The problem with the principle of sameness is that you have a real danger of creating an unnecessary cover version (such as Tom Jones' cover of "Kung Fu Fighting" from the Supercop OST) or of having a horribly incorrect idea of what sameness actually means (so, the doomy, bleak, intricate "In Every Dream Home a Heartache" became, in the hands of Fields of the Nephilim the doomy, shit, shit, shit, shit "In Every Dream Home a Heartache"). The Bauhaus cover of Ziggy Stardust is a pretty good principle of sameness cover.
The principle of difference is exemplified by Jonathon Coulton's cover of "Baby Got Back". Whatever you think about the sog on its merits, the gag is that this is a song made famous by a big, loud, black hip-hop artist of just the kind we don't like around here, being covered by a fey, white, indie singer-songwriter with a guitar of precisely the kind we do like around here. It's the same core gag as the Gilbert and Sullivan "Baby Got Back", the jazz-pop "Just" or indeed Jay-Z making as if to perform "Wonderwall". Within that, I think covers can be more or less respectful, on both sides, and of course more or less competent - Travis' cover of "Hit Me Baby One More Time" brings out a particular element of the original - its qualities as a lament - and does so pretty well given that this is Travis we're talking about.
Cover version question: why is the Soft Cell cover of "Tainted Love" necessary and the Marilyn Manson cover utterly unnecessary? |
|
|