BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Jason Lutes

 
 
Hallo, Paper Spaceboy
05:21 / 05.09.08
So, like, seven years later Book Two came out. Book Two of Jason Lutes's fantastic historical fiction, Berlin, taking place during the Weimar Republic of Germany-- first one was called City of Stone, which went up to the May Day demonstration during 1929, while City of Smoke starts up days after. I'm not finished even the first read of the thing but I feel compelled to talk about it, to talk about Lutes and his other work again.

Relevant wiki link.

First of all, there's the quality of the artwork. Lutes manages a very clean, simple line that reminds me quite strongly of Hergé -- Scott McCloud, maybe a little bit, though I find Lutes's artwork is much more delicate and polished. Quite the contrast to his work with Nick Bertozzi, who did the art for Houdini: The Handcuff King -- Bertozzi's lines are much messier, all over the place, shakier. Lutes's lines are almost oppressive with the sheer control evident in them.

Story itself is well-constructed, in the case of Berlin, around the ensemble motif that shows us a wide range of characters in different social settings, of different classes -- particularly important given the wide gaps between classes in Berlin at the time. He manages to capture the wild, bohemian community of artists and philosophers without overindulging or romanticizing it (and virtually every character is in a situation that is criticized implicitly or explicitly by someone else). He manages to be direct and not terribly sentimental while making the reader care about his characters; the ending of Book One is among the few times when a comic book has made me cry.

I'm only a couple chapters into Book Two, but I'm finding it a bit more detached than the first book. It's focused around two of his characters, Kurt Severing and Marthe Müller as they interview people involved with the demonstration on May Day; Kurt is the journalist and Marthe the artist. They're lovers, maybe only barely at this point, and he manages to tie their relationship's awkward decline into the dilapidation of Berlin quickly. I'm curious to see where it's going and I'm hoping that some of the warmth and energy from the first book crops up again in this one.

Is anyone else a fan of this guy's work?
 
 
sleazenation
17:58 / 07.09.08
Yes, I love Lutes work and Berlin is one of the titles I recommend to everyone each time we have one of those "what comics are good" threads.

His design language is right up there with Eisner. A wonderful eye for details, characters and the period. In fact his use of detail is one of the many things i adore about his work. He uses detail as a narrative tool in a way that few cartoonists on a monthly deadline have the time to. Great stuff.
 
 
Janean Patience
17:19 / 13.09.08
I read something glowing about Lutes roughly seven years ago and went straight out to buy Jar of Fools and was disappointed. It was such a small, fussily told story from what I remember without digging it out, a short story with characters contrived to fit. Berlin I liked a lot more. It was bigger, it was centred on a fascinating period which I know the back ground to reasonably well, it had scope and potential.

Comics are uniquely suited to historical fiction, I've always thought. If you're setting a brief scene in a Victorian workhouse or opium den in a book, you've got a whole lot of information to impart about how it looks and how people behaved in them which can overshadow the story and character moments. If the same scene's in a film then the plot can progress without exposition but the background's so full and so perfect - every item correctly sourced, every detail checked and rechecked - that it's equally distracting. Historical comics, From Hell being the best example, can give that detail when it's needed and convey it without interrupting the narrative but when it's unnecessary can take it away. Eddie Campbell was great at that, the flow of the story always his primary concern and the period detail fitting in around it.

Berlin: City of Stones leaned more towards a period movie, though. Something about that clean, detailed art made it seem like a reconstruction, a stage play. The characters were good and convincing, they drew breath as they should, but there wasn't any reason for them to be there except to guide us through this city at this time. I don't recall caring too much about what would happen to them; their fates will be symbolic of larger forces, moved by the dead hand of history. It was technically faultless, but somehow lacking in heart.

I can't bolster these observations with a reread because my comics have been hard to get to for a while, and practically all entertainment media in the house are currently inaccessible for wearying reasons. It's encouraging to me that I'm interested in the second volume and want it to be better. I may check it out, I'm struggling to find comics trades I want to buy these days.
 
  
Add Your Reply