BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Thinking about Dance-sploitation

 
 
Sensual Cobra
17:00 / 16.07.08
Hello everyone.

A friend and I have recently spent a disturbing amount of time thinking about what we've termed "dance movies" (or "dance-sploitation movies," depending on how sassy you'd like to get). These are films that not only feature lots of dancing, but are in an essential sense about dancing.

Step Up 2 The Streets is our most recent example of this, and follows a pretty common plotline: young, female street dancer suddenly finds herself a dancing fish out of water when she attends prestigious, upscale Dance Academy. There, the Establishment tells her to check her "streets" at the door. She, however, perseveres, and by the end of the film has won her instructor's respect for having kept it "real."

Step Up 2 plays off of class issues, pitting the streets against the establishment. The divide between street dancing and ballet becomes a marker of individual authenticity: it's more "real" to express yourself through street dancing (despite its taking place in a group) than through ballet, which is depicted as monotonously stifling. (Interestingly, the sheer amount of practice necessary to make street dancing look effortless never appears in the film, while ballet practice appears mainly to showcase the protagonist's confrontation with the headmaster.) The film seems to argue for a kind of bland "be yourself" life philosophy, but I'd like to here other thoughts about that.

The "find yourself through dance" trope seems pretty common in these films, as does the "the establishment will try to crush your individuality" trope. Footloose features Kevin Bacon confronting a repressive community, free its teens with the power of dance. Breakin' has a main character (white, female) turn to "the streets" to learn something about real dancing...and about herself. And so on.

Some films that seem to fit this very loosely-defined category:

Breakin'
Breakin'2: Electric Boogaloo
Step Up
Step Up 2 The Streets
Footloose
You Got Served
Beat Street
Save the Last Dance (or not? Is this about dance?)
Bring It On (or not? Should cheerleading count?)
Flashdance
Dirty Dancing
Center Stage

A few questions for anyone who's interested in these movies:

Is there a more useful way to categorize these films? "Dance-sploitation" strikes me as a fairly accurate, if somewhat dismissive, label. What sub-divisions might exist within this category?

Who are these movies for? I can watch a dance movie and be sort of impressed, but without any real knowledge of dance. Is the audience outside looking in, or already part of the dance community being portrayed?

What ideologies are present in these films, especially those hidden or unchallenged? No one ever seems to argue against dance as pure individual expression. Why not?

There's more of this kind of half-formed discussion on our Wiki page, but those are maybe enough to start with?
 
 
All Acting Regiment
12:57 / 18.07.08
What do you think is exploitative about these films?
 
 
Jackie Susann
21:52 / 22.07.08
You need to see Lambada: The Forbidden Dance!

I love these films, but I think AAR's question is a good one. (Also: yes, Bring It On is definitely a dance film.)
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
00:23 / 23.07.08
Well, presumably the term is a lift from "blaxsploitation", where the aim was specifically to draw in black audiences with cheaply-made films which were distinguished by having black actors (although often with white producers and directors, hence to a degree the exploitation part) - this is a bit different, because there isn't an under-represented class of dancers out there eager to see representations of themselves on the silver screen. However, there are a lot of people who are passionately interested in sex. I don't think I'm exactly pulling up trees to suggest that dancing in many of these films is a narratalogically cleansed version of sexual awakening, often between people from different social classes (Dirty Dancing) or racial groups (Save the Last Dance), or both.

Girls Just Want to Have Fun, the absolutely seminal teen dance film starring a young Sarah Jessica Parker (who, with an appearance in Footloose is basically the Max von Sydow of dance movies), is a pretty textbook example of this treatment. A young woman, new in town, befriends another young woman. They start to dance together, with a stated aim (in this case, a competition). However, their experimentation with each other proves unsatisfying. Through another agency (in this case a sprained ankle), the protagonist needs a new partner, and finds a young man from the wrong side of the tracks (a Patrick Swayze, if you really want to stretch the definition of "young"). They have radically different dancing styles - she classical and learned, he "street" and instinctive - and their relationship is tempestuous, but by mingling their styles they achieve a superior combination. However, class rifts and the awkwardness of the emergence of tender feelings, along with interference by a malign other competitor, protective and disapproving parent or both causes a misunderstanding and brief separation, before they are reconciled and go on to compete in and win their tournament, discovering at the same time that they are indeed in love.

Basically, this is a romance with dancing substituted for sex, which allows for depictions of teenagers without undue censorship or ickyness. Applied more broadly, dancing (and specifically "street" dancing that is, dancing to pop) expands to represent a number of behaviours adults are supposed to find terrifying - requiring as it does free time, a secret language of terms, endless practice with no vocational end in sight and a group of peers, dancing of this kind is easily identified as a clannish, teenaged activity. Your classic there is Footloose, in which the parents seek to exert control over teenagers by banning dancing, but are eventually won over to the necessity of letting teenagers do their thing - basically the plot of most Cliff Richard movies, essentially, but with a headier tang of sex.

The Kevin Bacon sort of dancing is subversive - it forces communities to decide on what their young people do. It breaks down class barriers - the girl from the good school and the boy from the projects, or the princess and the dance instructor - race barriers - the white ballerina and the black "hip-hop" dancer - and often gender barriers - at becomes a battleground between protective parents and in particular teenaged girls. In one example, the US/Italian co-production and work of genius Dance Academy, an entire ballet academy is subverted by the hip-swinging jazz dance of the new, blue-collar and bohemian influx, culminating in a dance-off with the new other - some breakdancers. Make of that what you will.

So, sex, class, race - the "streets", as you mention, and the ways to integrate the often dangerous or wretched "real" world with the often outmoded and exclusive academy. Note that parents in dance films often respond to their children dancing as if they were taking drugs or having sex - that is, rebelling in the way that the audience are more likely to be - and respond with curfews and crackdowns. The idea that anyone can dance with anyone else, like the idea that anyone can fall in love with or sleep with anyone else, is a dangerous one that is opposed by the authority figures around the protagonists.

Bring it On, by the way, I would suggest is probably actually a sports film, with some dance movie elements - the sport just happens to be cheerleading.
 
 
Jackie Susann
06:10 / 23.07.08
Come on, that's a pretty fine line - you could just as easily say Girls Just Wanna Have Fun is a sports movie and the sport happens to be dancing.

You're obviously right that dancing is partly a narrative metaphor for sex, but I think that mostly that's wedded to a pretty standard rags-to-riches story. And in terms of movies targetted to teen audiences, dance excellence also works as a metaphor for bodily self-control, and thus immunity to the worst perils of puberty.

I guess the genre emerged, for pretty obvious reasons, around the time musicals came to be considered old-fashioned? Having your characters be dancers is the "realistic" way to have your cast break out in dance numbers. Not sure the dates work out on this theory all that well, though.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
16:43 / 23.07.08
Come on, that's a pretty fine line - you could just as easily say Girls Just Wanna Have Fun is a sports movie and the sport happens to be dancing.

Sedition!

Seriously, I don't think you could just as easily say that. Bring it On involves a new captain taking over a team and finding that there are unknown conditions which make it impossible to maintain its success through familiar means. The team finds itself desperately in need of the skills of a maverick but talented player, whose involvement causes friction between those who value her abilities above her abraasive personality. Cast in the unexpected role of underdogs, the team goes up against the best in a grudge match watched by a strangely involved and passionate crowd...

It's a sports movie, with elements of dance movie, but far more elements of teen romantic comedy. It's closer to "She's All That" in some ways, with the cheerleading as a backdrop for the action.
 
 
Eek! A Freek!
17:34 / 23.07.08
Conformity...

The "Maverick/Uptight" stereotypes which are usually set up in these films (as well as Adam Sandler films, but that's another thread...) imply that compromise/conformity = Success.

The "maverick" needs to have a bit more discipline and learn to "play by the rules" a bit more and the "uptight" needs to let hir hair down a bit or get the stick out of hir ass... The two together then overcome all odds and WIN!

The driving desire (and formula) in all these films seems to be about acceptance; the need to belong to a group.

Now this isn't the case for all these films, but seems to be a motif in many.

Sometimes there is a variation on the theme where rebellion is good and the "Rebels" need to teach "Authority" to stop being so square, but the end result is that the "Mavericks" are accepted by society at large by the virtue of their talent and their willingness to belong...

IMHO
 
 
Jackie Susann
20:56 / 23.07.08
I don't know if I want to turn this into the Bring It On thread (did we ever have a Bring It On thread?), but I really think part of what's great about the movie is the way it plays with genre codes - so any assertion that it's genre X with elements of Y and Z is kind of beside the point. It's a teen romance where the main relationship is between the female protagonists; it's a sports movie where we're not sure who we want to win; it's a dance movie that emphasises teamwork over individual expression; etc, etc.

But then I want to say it's a dance movie, anyway, so maybe I'm just talking out my arse. If I was going to try to define the genre, I'd say dance movies are movies where the main characters struggle to be allowed to express themselves through dance. Bring It On almost certainly fits, given that cheerleading is, if nothing else, a tiny, pathetic subset of dance.

Is it worth asking if dance also works, in these movies, as a sign of generational conflict - thinking of the long history of new (young people's) dances being declared obscene, mainly, and also Honey's mum's anxiety that "hiphop can't take you the places ballet can, Honey."
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
21:26 / 23.07.08
One interesting thing about Bring it On is that Missy is clearly the girl from the wrong side of the tracks - punk-rock, sneery, not blonde - but she is also the exemplar of a higher form of dance - she is a classical gymnast who finds cheerleading pathetically easy, although she is of course then led to understand its many virtues.

That's the other reason, of course, why it isn't exactly a dance film - cheerleading isn't exactly dancing. See also Michelle Trachtenberg's Ice Queen.

Freektemple - where you see compromise, I see monkey lust, but it's a fair position. Can you give examples?
 
 
Jackie Susann
22:11 / 23.07.08
But cheerleaders are dancers who've gone retarded!
 
 
Jackie Susann
22:23 / 23.07.08
Which is to say, it's a kind of dance. I mean, it's choreographed movement; if it's not dance, I don't really know why. You've described gymnastics as a "higher form of dance", so I'm not sure we really disagree on this.

You've made me want to construct some elaborate table of the parallels in the narrative, but one is obviously that there are two figurings of "from the wrong side of the tracks" - Missy, yes, but also the Clovers. Or maybe the trope in question isn't "wrong side of the tracks" but "fish out of water", like Kevin in Footloose or Julia in Save The Last Dance.
 
 
Paralis
03:02 / 24.07.08
Part of the classification problem here is that all dance films are not created equal. The class and self-expressive issues so boldly confronted by Dirty Dancing and Flashdance (to name but two) are by no means universal touchstones of the dance film genre, especially as the films get more modern. After having resolved the societal dynamics of interracial relationships and the viability of pop-and-lock as an art form, Breakin' 2's cultural dilemma is economic, and dance serves not as a form of self-discovery but solely as class validation, which is more in line with the tropes of sport film than of more of the dance films listed above.

Which is to say that, to my mind, Bring It On is every bit as much a dance film as You Got Served. Which surely the latter is, if on strictly literal terms--but as surely we're not talking about the same thing or the same issues and subtext at play as in films like Save the Last Dance or Center Stage. Which I suppose rather neatly echoes dance (and cheerleading)'s misapprehension as art exclusive of sport.
 
 
Evil Scientist
08:38 / 24.07.08
One possible point in favour of Bring It On being included in the Dance Film pantheon would be that, in the last stages of their preparation for the finals the Toros have themselves a training montage where they incorporate various dance styles into their performance. The dance moves they use help them to improve their stretchy-bendy-jumpy skills and win through.

But, to quote another film favourite of mine:

"Sports movie? Dude, "Roller Ball"'s a sports movie!"
 
 
Eek! A Freek!
12:42 / 24.07.08
In Save the Last Dance, Derek overcomes his past troubles by applying the discipline learned from ballet. He lets go of the "Street"(partially) and embraces ballet(partially) and the result is a compromise that pleases everyone. Sara does the same, but in reverse: she embraces the passion of the streets to remind her of what dancing is all about...

Maybe I'm off mark with my first stance, and that it's the melding of the "Rebel" and "Authority" and the resulting hybrid which is the point? It could be a two way street, and not just a taming of youth... That (for a very loose anology) Old (and/or WASP America) has a lot to learn from Young (and/or "The Streets") and the Young (and/or "The Streets") can also benefit from experience and predominance of the Old (and/or WASPS.) (Can't we all just get along?)

Although not a "dance" film per se, I'm also reminded of the movie Drumline... It has similar elements.

One example of the conformity=success film (I really hope I'm not stretching too far...) is the Cinderella/Pygmalion archtype in films like Strictly Ballroom: Take one plain awkward girl, add some makeup and a hairdo, teach her some moves and Voila! A love interest which is embraced by everyone, most of all by the once haughty male who falls in love with her as she transforms. (Sandy from Grease underwent a similar transformation in reverse, going from a pretty but whitebread girl to a smoking hot street tramp to gain acceptance from her lover's peers.)

I think that I always try spin some "Oh no, Big Brother is subversively trying to get us to conform!" in a lot of my arguments; it seems top be my knee-jerk reaction. When I sit and think and review, I see that I'm off base in a lot of cases. I still think that "Fitting in" is a central theme, but in only a handful of cases does conformity=success...

Thanks for getting me to think about it a bit more in depth, Haus.
...
I mean Ms. Elfman.
...
Gosh you're pretty.
 
 
Ron Stoppable
12:51 / 24.07.08
But, surely, Rollerball is a Sports movie? That's not in question, is it? It follows very closely the formula laid out above by which Bring It On meets the standard. Like that movie - like any movie - there are elements of other types of film in it but yeh; sports movie. Definitely.

For a film that nearly exactly follows that formula, see Salute Of The Jugger. No really, you should see it if you haven't. While there are definite thematic and visual elements of Post-Apocalypse movie in it, at its heart it's still a sports flick. And that's the point: the story - the journey if you like - is one of sporting and personal achievement against improbable odds, external challenges and those closer to home set against the backdrop of high school dance culture, corporate tyranny, post-apocoalyptic survival, whatever.
 
 
Ron Stoppable
12:53 / 24.07.08
Woah - a bit offtopic that, perhaps. Sorry, I'd started to think this was a Sports Movie thread..
 
 
Jackie Susann
02:46 / 29.07.08
I saw Step Up 2 on the weekend, and I don't think I've ever seen a movie with such a great opening end up being so very bad. First five minutes: we meet the 410, public art dance terrorists being inexplicably persecuted by the cops for breaking in public. This is a movie I want to see! But then it turns out they are the bad guys, and we're supposed to identify with the privileged (and mostly white) ballet school misfits. Nothing in the last 20 minutes makes any sense. The dancing is amazing, but it's also one of the most racist movies I've ever seen.
 
 
Sensual Cobra
05:05 / 29.07.08
Jackie Susann, I agree that the movie takes an ill-advised turn early on, with the 410 crew becoming more villainous than necessary. The ease with which the protagonist dumps them makes her less likable, in my eyes, and it struck me as inconsistent that she'd rail against their demands that she conform, only to go find another group of "misfits" to define her identity. Do any "dance troupe" movies make explicit this tension between collective and group identity? They seem to get glossed over here. Or group identity ends up defining individual identity in surprisingly unquestioned ways (within the film) .

Can we talk more about the "racism" in Step Up 2 The Streets? (Not being dismissive with the scare-quotes, just signaling indeterminacy.) The movie makes no mention of race, if I recall, and this surprised me. Partly because, as you noted, it seems pretty obvious. So what to make of this?

Paralis, I agree that not all dance films are created equal, and I'm more than game for a broad system of categorization. Your view of Flashdance and Dirty Dancing as primarily about class and self-expression sounds useful to me; we might propose the "finding yourself and transcending your class" dance movie as one category. Of course, finding yourself and transcending your class could take place via any number of plots -- so why dance? Is there a particular transcendence that can take place only through dance?

Dance as sublimated sex also sounds spot on; Breakin', for example, has a remarkable lack of sex, or even sexual tension. Step Up 2 has a perfunctory love interest, but that plot thread's neither well-developed or believable. Sublimated sex most often appears in the "teen dance movie," which we might propose as another category, one employing the tropes of budding (but stymied!) sexuality, rebellion against authority, and so on.

So, Haus, on your point that the dancing in these films represents a host of subversive forces, can we say that the films themselves are in any way subversive? I'd offer a tentative no, if only because these movies all have happy endings.

Finally, the "dance-sploitation" tag riffs on "blaxsploitation" without, I think, having the same meaning of actual exploitation. As Haus mentioned, I don't think there's an underserved audience of dance aficionados being taken to the cleaners by these films. I originally saw the term in The Onion A/V club, sans hyphen. What it draws attention to, I suspect, is the typically formulaic plotlines of these films: it's really about the dancing, not the story.

(The format of spectacular dance scenes linked together by mediocre plots connects back to Haus's take on dance as sublimated sex. What other genre highlights scenes of sweaty, undulating bodies, linking them together with comparatively uninspiring plot-service scenes? Pornography. And, in a different way, action movies.)
 
 
Jackie Susann
21:10 / 01.08.08
I think what we "make of" Step Up 2's "silence" on race is that the writers didn't think it through; I'm not saying they set out to make a racist propaganda piece. But we have two dance crews, one street-based, villainous, and led and dominated by black dancers (despite some token multi-ethnic back-up spots), and one ballet-school-based, virtuous, and led and dominated by white dancers (despite some token multi-ethnic back-up spots). It doesn't take a whole lot of decoding.

What makes it even more striking, though, is that we're obviously supposed to take the 710 as the bad guys, even though they never do anything bad. To me, they come across much more sympathetic than the ballet crew (I forget their name). The ballet crew break into and vandalise Tuck's house, film themselves doing it, and broadcast it on the net. And it's somehow a harmless prank, in the film's terms, even though the 710 dancing on a train is widely decried as 'illegal'? You deserve to get beat up for that sort of thing.

Incidentally, in France, this movie is called Sexy Dance 2.
 
  
Add Your Reply