BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Priests - Necessary mediators between the Masses and the Gods?

 
 
Eek! A Freek!
12:33 / 08.05.08
The role of priests, priestesses, hongouns, shamans, imams, witch-doctors, etc… have played vital roles in tribal development throughout every culture of the world. (For simplicity sake, I will use the term Priest, although the term is a garment which will not fit all examples from all religions. Be aware I am not speaking of only Catholic priests, but anyone who fills the role of spiritual leader of a given culture. I will, however frequently use the Catholic Church to illustrate points, from time to time, as it offers easy analogies, and will be familiar with most people. )

They have been healers, councilors, law-makers, psychiatrists, and diplomats. Actually, the various roles the priest class has played throughout history are too varied to mention. Their impact on society as a whole too important and too vast to properly measure.

But what about their actual roles as mediators between the tribe and God? While some priests have proven to be “Holy”, are they really more holy than us?

Granted, a “Priest” may have gone through several phases of initiation, have been privy to occult texts or oral traditions, but are they actually “closer” to God than the layperson, and are they actually necessary to be the go-between from God to man?

As I see it, the early Christian Gnostics believed that a relationship with god was one-on-one and must be developed individually. Each individual could then form their personal ideas about and commune with God without relying on forced consensus. Correct me if I’m wrong, but the Sufi’s believed in a similar, individual path to God.

On the other hand, the priestly classes of the world always saw themselves as being a step closer to God and the only path to God was through them. From the Ancient Egyptians, through the Catholic Church, through to the present day Haitian Hongouns who are attempting to organize a “formal” class of spiritual leaders, with a Pope-like figure at the head, the"Priest-Class have weilded vast power and have jealously tried to preserve their roles as being the mouth-pieces of God. While many have been sincere in their beliefs, there has been much corruption in this class, and sometimes they have been responsible for great atrocity.

So… Do we need priests to commune with God?
 
 
Proinsias
13:40 / 08.05.08
So… Do we need priests to commune with God?

I wouldn't have thought we need priests to commune with god but, like having a maths lecturer around when trying to understand numbers, they could be useful to have around.
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
14:22 / 08.05.08
I think its possible for any human being to have a direct personal relationship with deity, yeah; but I'd also argue that not everyone is either inclined or has the specific aptitude to develop that relationship to the same level of depth as others. In the same way that everyone can benefit from knowing some basic self defense or basic first aid, but not everyone is going to develop those skills to the same level as Bruce Lee or a top surgeon. And that is totally fine. Not everyone needs to. Someone might be an occasional dabbler in magic but be a fucking awesome footballer or MC or parent. You're always going to have specialists in any field, and I think that ultimately that is what a priest, or a shaman or a houngan or mambo is.

I think this can be a bit problematised when the role of priest becomes a functioning business. If your livelihood is bound up with your special status as community priest, it is in your economic interest to promote the idea that people require you as an intermediary. It becomes a survival issue. For a contemporary example, a Santeria Priest makes their living performing initiation rites, which can cost upwards of £1000. Hence, the official position of the Santeria orthodoxy tends to be that non-initiates cannot have access to the Orisha of their own accord, and must go via an initiated priest until they themselves are initiated. The rigid codification of Santeria makes sense if you look at it in its historic context - its current form was set around 1870-1890 as a means of unifying disparate strands of Cuban Orisha worship and better preserving that body of knowledge. But the existence of a plethora of other very different forms of Orisha worship throughout the Diaspora - Candomble, Umbanda, Daime, Quimbanda, etc - along with the large differences between Santeria and Yoruban traditions in Africa from which it is derived - would tend to undermine the idea that the way of the Santero/Santera and the specific beliefs of Santeria are the only route to the Orisha.

The doctrine of Vodou, insofar as there is one, at least tends to allow for the reality of practitioners having an active relationship with the spirits without actually entering the formal clergy. The blessings of the Lwa are available to everyone - and the role of Priest is about better facilitating that, not asserting control over it. It's common for someone to work with the Lwa their entire life and finally get made up as a Houngan or Mambo as the crowning moment of their life's work.

However, with the rise of "Vodou tourism" the idea has circulated in the west that you must become a houngan as the entry point of your exploration of Vodou, rather than as the crowning achievement of a life's work. So you have the slightly ridiculous scenario of newcomers to the religion getting immediately made up as Houngan Asogwe - a rank equivalent to that of Bishop in the Catholic church - just because their money is good. Us western magicians love a bit of status, and the more exotic the better, so tourist initiations can be quite a lucrative earner, especially if you're struggling to feed the hungry mouths of your nearest and dearest in one of the poorest nations in the world.

But the way I see it, Houngan Asogwe, or even Houngan sur Point, are roles that come with specific community duties within the context of Haitian culture. I don't think you can really transplant these roles outside of Haiti - unless you are a part of the Haitian community somewhere like Brooklyn or Miami or something like that. But if someone gets done up in Haiti as a Vodou Bishop (charged to the credit card), and then returns to their home in suburban Croydon, that role is going to have to adapt so much to the new cultural context that its original meaning in Haiti is inevitably going to get lost somewhere along the line. It just becomes a status thing, rather than an actual job description.

I tend to get a bit of flak sometimes for being a British Voodoo practitioner who has largely bypassed the orthodox structures of Santeria/Candomble/Haitian Vodou/etc in favour of a direct contact approach to the mysteries. However most of this flak has either come from other white western magicians trying to play the status game with me (Fraters with Charters) or from dodgy docs trying to flog me above-the-market-rate initiations. In contrast to this, the last Haitian Mambo I met didn't have any sort of problem with my personal practice whatsoever, and in her eyes - if the Lwa were speaking to me and coming into my dreams, that's validity in itself. It is what it is, and you don't need any external human agency to validate your experience of the ineffable. I was offered initiation, but more as a means of strengthening my practice, not as a way of validating it. I decided not to take it, as I am quite happy with my own practice and actually fiercely proud of my somewhat fractured, totally unorthodox line of transmission. I felt it would be disrespectful to my line - as fragmented and weird as it is - to abandon it in favour of something that looked more legit on paper in the eyes of people who place more value on provable credentials over direct experience.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
14:28 / 08.05.08
I think the question as you're framed it is going to be a bit difficult to answer, just because you've conflated a number of different roles under the blanket term "priest." You list "priests, priestesses, hongouns, shamans, imams, [and] witch-doctors"; there may be a few areas of overlap, but these are not the same role at all. Houngan and Iman are very specific roles that go with particular religions, whereas priest/ess is looser, and witch-doctor possibly perjorative. A shaman may have a priestly role, ze may not.

Other than that, I think my unfortunately-named collegue has rather nailed it with the math lecturer analogy (with the reservation that you may "need" a priest in the context of certain trads if you wish to conform to the strict specifics of the tradition. For example, if you want to call yourself a practicing Roman Catholic, you rather need a priest to make it all happen).

F'rexample, I have one or two people in my life who fulfill a "priestly" role, either officially (I'm a card carrying member of a far-flung e-kindred, and the Gythja* thereof is my Gythja) or unofficially (there are people who fulfill a similar role for me but in other contexts where my Gythja can't help much). I've also temporarily taken a "priestly" role myself a few times. Now, in my trad you don't need a priest, you just need an honest desire to engage with and learn from the Gods and spirits of that tradition, to make changes to your life in accordance with the things that tradition requires of you... and a willingness to do a metric fuckload of homework. But having a Godhi or Gythja to turn to for advice doesn't half help when you're feeling confused, uncertain about something, or need to borrow a copy of Njal's Saga.


*Godhi/Gythja: heathen priest/ess.
 
 
EvskiG
14:53 / 08.05.08
Elaine Pagels' book The Gnostic Gospels has quite a bit on this issue.

Essentially, she suggests that proto-orthodox Christianity saw Gnostic texts as non-canonical, and even heretical, because they said that Christians could apprehend the divine without the aid of bishops or the Church hierarchy.
 
 
Samael
19:36 / 08.05.08
Well, priests CAN be a hoot as drinking partners and fuck buddies, but only when they let the nuns party too.

Couldn't resist.

I tend to go with the notion of a priest simply having more knowledge in whatever spiritual arena to give to the neophyte. Someone to offer guidelines, and advice. After that, it's just a title, to which any power and meaning is ultimately up to an individual's perspective.

I will also say this, whenever I have met anyone bestowing upon themselves the monicker of priest(ess) or high priest(ess) of this lodge or that coven or the Sunday morning shuffle-board players, it always seems that they either gain my respect by thier knowledge and candor, or are hilariously enamoured of thier own little title and blinded by it, and as such get as much respect from me as a meter maid does.
 
 
EmberLeo
23:53 / 08.05.08
Well, I think I prompted this thread, but that the question has changed.

The original question that I pinged on was "If you can form your own relationship with god, who needs priests?"

In this thread, you say "They have been healers, councilors, law-makers, psychiatrists, and diplomats. Actually, the various roles the priest class has played throughout history are too varied to mention. Their impact on society as a whole too important and too vast to properly measure."

Thereby answering the question.

Other than that, I agree with everyone else - when it comes to forming your own connection[s] with the Divine, it helps to have advice and assistance from somebody else who is further along on a similar path. Those who dedicate a significant amount of their time to being the further-along person who turns around and helps others in their reaching may be considered clergy.

--Ember--
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
01:09 / 09.05.08
Yeah, that's true.

Being more of a Christian than magickal type, I have to say (without wishing to slate anyone else's path) that intermediates of whatever kind have never really been my thing. Catholicism puts me off because even beyond the priests and what-have-you there's the Saints, who will put your case... that's not for me.

I want my relationship with God to be exactly that. Between me, the creation, and the Creator. Which is why I call myself a Christian in my own terms (I believe in the teachings of Christ as a damn good way of living one's life), but would not describe myself as one if anyone asked me. My faith is between me and my God. And we really don't get on a lot of the time. But I don't talk to Him through anyone or anything else.

My relationship with God (and I am still very confused as to who, or indeed WHETHER, he is) has to be a personal one. He's fucked me over sometimes, sometimes He's really come through for me against the odds.

But I want that direct connection. Even when it doesn't work. Christ as intercessor doesn't dilute it as much as you'd think, because he IS God, once you're in that paradigm.

I get VERY confused when I start comparing the OT God to the NT God, though. Is Yahweh still Christ's father when they act so fucking differently? I have no idea. But I DO want a personal relationship with the God of the New Testament. The God who fathered Jesus. (Also the God who, along with Jesus, had NO part in the actually unpleasant bits of the New Testament). The God I see in everything.

I want to know Him myself, at first-hand. Not via an intermediary. I want a DIRECT FUCKING LINE.

I know this probably isn't the question which was being asked, and I apologise for that. But I'm drunk and got carried away. Sorry.
 
 
Eek! A Freek!
13:18 / 09.05.08
Well, I think I prompted this thread, but that the question has changed.

I tried to keep the spirit of the question alive, but decided to preempt on those people who may accuse me of Priest-bashing by acknowledging the positive roles that priests have played.

I even accept the fact that a person who devotes their lives to a priestly pursuit may be a great font of information and direction-pointer, but the question stands, do we need them? Especially in reference to our spiritual needs? If they want to take another role, I won’t stop them, but I do not think that they are authorities of my salvation.

I have read The Gnostic Gospels by Pagels, as well, and admit that it has influenced my thinking (As books tend to do…) and my beef lies with those priests who are concrete in their beliefs that “Their way is the only way”, to the extent that people who do not believe in “their way” will be ostracized or even killed.

I admire Douglas Rushkoff and like his model of an open source religion: I believe that religions need to adapt both to individuals and the times they find themselves living in.

The idea of Ideas and/or Beliefs being “written in stone” is foolhardy and caused much strife in the world. When a Jewish person asserts that one must follow Moses and his Laws; when a Christian asserts that salvation lies only through Christ; when a Moslem asserts that Muhammad is “The seal of the Prophets”, then there will always be problems. Whenever someone says “This is how it is, always, unchanging” they go against the dynamic, evolving nature of the Universe (I believe) and this seems to be what a lot of Priest’s do: They try impose their world-view on others.

No, not all Priests, and looking at what I’ve written, I speak of the west, but I still become very leery when someone claims to be an expert in regards to my spiritual well-being.

Maybe it’s that some Priests are really Teachers, while some Priests are really petty Dictators, and it’s hard to tell them apart.
 
 
EvskiG
13:33 / 09.05.08
When a Jewish person asserts that one must follow Moses and his Laws

Jews don't exactly follow Moses.

And they're supposed to be God's laws, not Moses's. He just wrote 'em down.

Or so they say.
 
 
Eek! A Freek!
13:58 / 09.05.08
Follow as a Prophet, then? (Maybe I reached too far for an example, the jist is there...)
I do, of course, speak in generalities: if I miss a subtle point I apologise. I doubt that anyone here is an expert in all religions, and if you are an expert in one, it's easy to pick apart someone's examples and arguments as they you would tend to feel that don't know or understand the intricacies of that particular religion. Again: when people are inflexible in their beliefs, it leads to strife. (as we've recently witnessed in other threads.)
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
14:35 / 09.05.08
I think the problem with the Priest role, in all its permutations, is that the position of mediating between an individual and their conception of the Divine is a role that gives you tremendous power over that individual - as your are essentially functioning as the living mouth piece of that person's God/s. So, like any position of power, it is open to corruption and it often attracts people who for whatever reason feel a need to exert power over others. This is not always something that is done consciously, and I think it is possible for people occupying the priest role to abuse that position in a way that they are not prepared to fully admit to themselves. I'd say the sign of a good Priest is probably a person who manages to perform this role of mediation in a non-intrusive and non-dictatorial way, that aids, facilitates and enhances the spiritual lives of others without abusing the power that role entails according to their own personal agenda.
 
 
EmberLeo
19:50 / 09.05.08
decided to preempt on those people who may accuse me of Priest-bashing by acknowledging the positive roles that priests have played.

Mrf. But I admit to being a little sensitive - the question is of personal interest to me, because I'm in clergy training.

I do not think that they are authorities of my salvation.

Salvation is a fairly specific idea that doesn't apply to all, or even necessarily most clergy roles. Well, I guess it depends on how you're counting, doesn't it? Are we talking "most clergy" as in "count up all the folks who serve as clergy in the world - how many are in a Salvation religion?" or are we talking "Count up all the religions in the world and their various clergy roles - how many are Salvation roles?"

the question stands, do we need them

Mmm, no more than I need a farmer to grow my food for me when I can, in theory, grow my own. Well, perhaps that's a little further from the mark.

Mystics don't need the kind of clergy you are describing, per se. Perhaps the average person for whom God is a fact of life, but not necessarily a personal friend, that is at least as in the way as He is helpful... those folks probably need the intermediary kind of priests around just to take the load off their own backs. It's a relief to know someone's taking care of those things if you feel that someone does need to and you have neither the leisure nor the inclination for it to be YOU.

But that is not the cultural perspective you are coming from - nor, indeed, are most folks on this board, I'm guessing.

So the Mystics? The mages? Well, the ones being thwaped upside the head with Divine Contact probably don't need the kind of priest who offers to help them get in touch with the Divine more closely. But they may need the kind of priest who has a clue how to keep from going completely insane while they juggle the reality they're being confronted with, and the reality that everyone else expects them to understand. This is something I get more and more often these days "Odin is knocking on my head - hard - what do I DO? It's interfering with my schoolwork! AUGH! I can't think clearly enough right now to figure it out, I need HELP!"

Then, also, there's the folks who are interested in magic, interested in the Divine, and aren't sure how to go about doing it. They could, I suppose, read books, experiment directly, and yes, plenty of people do. But some folks don't learn well from books. Some folks are too scared to experiment without talking to somebody who knows what's what first. Those folks might go talk to someone more experienced in the same path. Somebody who deliberately arranges to be available for that kind of advice could be termed clergy. I get that a lot too.

The last category you've already acknowledged - Clergy are often just Counselors for everyday life and shit. And I get that the most. For some thoroughly explicable reason folks expect somebody who deals with Freya and Freyr a lot to have good advice about relationships. Well, I do okay on my own, and with Their input, but I'd like a better foundation, which is why I am earnestly interested in earning a Masters of Marriage and Family Counseling - I want my guesses to be more educated.

There's another category I'm not sure how to address... Initatory experiences, be they coming of age rituals, or otherwise, often require letting someone else be in charge.

Sometimes it's because you don't know, never having done it yourself, how to run such a ritual smoothly and effectively - so you ask an expert or at least someone more experienced to run it for you. I have a headwash coming up in a year and a half - I can't wash my own head. Mama may not be the only one who can, but somebody other than me has to do it, 'cause I don't know how.

Frequently it's because your own role in the ritual is something else, and you can't do both at once. I conducted my sister's wedding. I guess she could do it herself - she certainly has the event-coordinator experience, anyway - but she was kind of busy being the bride.

Sometimes it's because if you do all the planning, you either can't include the mystery, or you've spoiled it. I, in theory, have an ordeal coming up that is part of my work understanding the loss and gain of self control. Wow would it defeat the purpose if I tried to run it myself.

Not a single one of these involves requring a priest to save someone's soul.

Gypsy: I'd say the sign of a good Priest is probably a person who manages to perform this role of mediation in a non-intrusive and non-dictatorial way, that aids, facilitates and enhances the spiritual lives of others without abusing the power that role entails according to their own personal agenda.

Now that's pretty significant - how much of the "Priests aren't needed" reaction is a rejection of authority just in general? There's a big difference between an authority and an expert, and yet another difference between either of those and a teacher. There is plenty of responsibility on the part of the clergy to not abuse their own roles. But frankly, I've seen that one from the other side, and damnit, there is just as much responsibility on the part of the people to not put their clergy on pedestals, and then blame them later when they turn out to still be human.

I have seen it happen. You get people who think the definition of clergy is somebody who is available to solve all your problems, spiritual or otherwise, 24/7 on demand. If you're anything less than flawless and constantly available, well how dare you lead us astray by calling yourself clergy! It's ridiculous. But people do it. No matter how many times you try to say "Look, I'm human, I have needs and limitations", folks want you to be a demigod - because it's easier than having to make their own decisions.

Honestly, I think that's where half the problem comes from right there - as long as you've got people willing to interact with priests that way, you'll have priests ready and willing to accept that kind of attention. As long as you have priests convinced that their role is to be a demigod in the lives of their congregation, you'll have people who find it easier to let somebody else think for them.

Eep, I think I'm ranting. I'll stop now.

--Ember--
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
22:29 / 09.05.08
So the Mystics? The mages? Well, the ones being thwaped upside the head with Divine Contact probably don't need the kind of priest who offers to help them get in touch with the Divine more closely. But they may need the kind of priest who has a clue how to keep from going completely insane while they juggle the reality they're being confronted with, and the reality that everyone else expects them to understand. This is something I get more and more often these days "Odin is knocking on my head - hard - what do I DO? It's interfering with my schoolwork! AUGH! I can't think clearly enough right now to figure it out, I need HELP!"

Yes, that's rather the kind of priest I've found myself needing.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
22:42 / 09.05.08
Hmm, that's interesting- I was thinking of the question purely in terms of a "priest" being a conduit between oneself and one's god.

Now, a "priest" being something more like a guide for helping one cope with their own direct relationship with their god... THAT's bloody useful, I reckon.
 
 
EmberLeo
00:09 / 10.05.08
After talking with friends, I also want to cite the roles Clergy play not to individuals, but to communities.

The two examples that came up in our conversation were the recognition of a new member i.e. birth celebrations, "Christenings" and such, and general community support. Check out what the Monks in Burma are doing right now while the government is preventing international support efforts.

--Ember--
 
 
Haloquin
00:12 / 11.05.08
"I even accept the fact that a person who devotes their lives to a priestly pursuit may be a great font of information and direction-pointer, but the question stands, do we need them? Especially in reference to our spiritual needs? If they want to take another role, I won’t stop them, but I do not think that they are authorities of my salvation."

I think it kinda also depends on which "we" you are talking about. "We" as a human race... yes. In terms of priests as people who are willing to mediate for people who aren't capable/willing to work on a direct relationship... or facilitate, or do any of the things Ember mentioned.

"We" as in individuals capable of connecting with the divine ourselves... no. I personally have both the time and inclination to develop my own relationship with the divine. I do need guidance and community and find teachers and people in a clergy type role to be very helpful, but I don't need an intermediator-type priest. And I'm certainly not interested in someone claiming to have the way or the keys to my salvation. But, as a race, with lots of different people... "We" have a definite space for priests, and people certainly feel the need for them.
 
  
Add Your Reply