BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


CERN and the Large Hadron Collider - a primer for beginners.

 
 
Ron Stoppable
14:31 / 01.04.08
Hi all,

I find myself enormously intrigued by the experiments about to kick off at the CERN Labs in (or rather, under) Switzerland soon; proton acceleration, the search for Higgs Bosun and investigations to determine the physics behind matter and mass and how they apply to the start of the universe.

Also, the potential for the accidental creation of black holes and unleashing of the precisely named "strange energy" in what might be all my sci-fi fantasies coming true in my lifetime.

The thing is; I only have the most tenuous grasp of particle physics and even such online resources as are designed for the layman are a bit too dense for me. So, with that in mind, can someone explain to a non-scientist what it's all about?

Apologies if this thread already exists somewhere or would be better suited to Questions And Answers - mods, please feel free to shunt it around.

Cheers!
 
 
grant
19:43 / 01.04.08
I mentioned CERN's LHC in an old blog post marveling at this image:



Here's a Discover article headlined "The Biggest Thing in Physics".

It's BIG:
The collider’s underground tunnel carves a circle 17 miles in circumference, traversing the border between Switzerland and France. At four locations it passes through caverns crammed with detectors the size of buildings.

Two of those detectors are competing to find evidence of a Higgs boson once the thing is up, running and slamming particles together in ways they've never been slammed before (except during the Big Bang, some physicists say).

We’re about to take an elevator more than 300 feet belowground, into a tunnel containing the biggest, most violently energetic particle collider the world has ever known.

The endless, gently curving tunnel is so crowded with massive high-tech equipment that there isn’t much room for any transportation other than a bike. “Best way of getting around down here,” Limon explains.

What’s filling the tunnel is the beam pipe: the hardware used to accelerate subatomic particles (protons, mostly) to 99.999999 percent of the speed of light.


and

When the machine is switched on for the first time at the end of this year, particles will make a lap around the LHC in less than one ten-thousandth of a second.

Keeping those particles on track requires serious bending power from more than 1,200 superconducting magnets, each of which weighs several tons apiece. Each magnet must be kept at –456 degrees Fahrenheit—colder than the void between galaxies—requiring CERN to build the world’s biggest cryogenic system to handle the 185,000 gallons of liquid helium that will be used to chill the magnets.


That's a lot of containment.

And the thing is, the physicists here aren't content just to accelerate mass-bearing particles (protons) to near the speed of light. They're doing it with two streams going in opposite directions, then smashing the streams into one another.

There will be 600 million particle collisions per second, and although the particles themselves are mere specks—less than a million millionth the size of a gnat—their collective energy will be that of an express train.


and, more to the point,

The LHC’s subatomic fireballs will be the highest-energy particle collisions ever seen on Earth. This is uncharted territory: The collisions at LHC could spray out strange new kinds of matter, unfurl hidden dimensions of space, even generate tiny glowing reenactments of the birth of the universe. In short, there is more than just the search for the Higgs going on at the LHC. “We don’t even know what to expect,” says French physicist Yves Schutz. “We’re now in a domain of energy that nobody has ever explored.”

...Many of the particles will survive only a trillionth or less of a second before decaying, but that will be long enough to leave a telltale trail. The vast size of the CMS is a function of the immense energies involved. The bigger the energy, the stronger the magnet needed to deflect the particles and the more space required to register their properties.


The "nobody has ever explored" thing is the part that has some concerned citizens a little wibbly.

This probably isn't in-depth enough for you, but it's all that I know.
 
 
Evil Scientist
08:46 / 02.04.08
Strange matter baby! Some nights I pray for strange matter.

I have to say I've just put "cycle around the CERN accelerator" at the top of my Things To Do list.
 
 
Ron Stoppable
10:28 / 02.04.08
Wow. Just.. wow.

Thanks guys; I love this. I read somewhere that so far it has cost the thick end of a billion dollars, which while small change compared to the US defence budget or the space programme is still some serious walkin' around money.

I occasionally find myself a little conflicted about the staggering sums of money expended on projects like this. There are a few arguments you often hear in discussion of space exploration in particular, suggesting better practical application for that cash - tackling many of the issues that beset humanity in the here and now. While I can't help but have sympathy for that view, I struggle not to get excited about mankind's drive to make these massive - even evolutionary - leaps in understanding. It's an embeddded human iimperative, I think.

Perhaps there's a new discussion thread here... will think on.
 
 
grant
14:40 / 02.04.08
I love the bikes, too.

And from the "strangelet" article:

If the strange matter hypothesis is correct, and a strangelet comes in contact with a lump of ordinary matter such as Earth, it could convert the ordinary matter to strange matter. This "ice-nine" disaster scenario is as follows: one strangelet hits a nucleus, catalyzing its immediate conversion to strange matter. This liberates energy, producing a larger, more stable strangelet, which in turn hits another nucleus, catalyzing its conversion to strange matter. In the end, all the nuclei of all the atoms of Earth are converted, and Earth is reduced to a hot, large lump of strange matter.

Gah.
 
 
grant
16:08 / 04.04.08
Meanwhile, someone uses scary big words and numbers in an attempt to comfort us about the mini-black hole scenario.

I'm not sure I understand *why* the black hole wouldn't wind up oscillating in the center of the Earth.
 
 
DecayingInsect
19:12 / 05.04.08
String Theorist Lubos Motl's blog has a rebuttal aimed at what he terms "LHC Alarmists".
 
 
grant
18:05 / 09.04.08
And XKCD points out a potential problem that hasn't really been brought up.

Sorry, couldn't help myself.

But I do think the kind of awe that physicists seem to get talking about this stuff is what freaks people out.
 
  
Add Your Reply