I don't think Kali meant the board, just that the post's tone might not be ideal for an effective discussion of the show, because ze seems rather agressive from the get-go. Not that I necessarily agree with her, though I do think that people opposed to the Moh in all his pasty, huge-nosed glory (and, well, yes, whiteness*, which I wasn't aware would be an issue) should, maybe, be banned, or shot.
Haven't yet watched this latest episode but have already read some mentions of Eliza... singing. You know, this whole "Dushku Showcase" is starting to carry the stench of a bizarre overbudget Faith fan-fic. She can kick ass! She can wear glasses! She can sing! She has large breasts! Can she fly? Is she Jesus? But I'm trying to hold onto the hope that there's a point to this.
(* Sort of.)
-
On the adoration note, re: the talk upthread between El Directo and iamus: Whedon, responding to the "Why strong women?" question:
I don't remember if I gave the one answer that I don't really think I understood at the time, was that I do it to help myself. That that is my identification figure. Those characters are the person that I am in my fiction. They're like my avatars. I really hadn't realized that and it's weird for me not to. All those years of writing Buffy, I'd say, "Well, I relate to Xander." And it was always Buffy. Buffy was always the person that I was in that story because I'm not in every way. Why my identification figure is female, I'm not exactly sure but she is. So it was a true kind of therapy, a real autobiographical kind of therapy for me to be writing that particular character, that strong woman. I don't know why.
So, if anything, Whedon is a fictional lesbian.
Or, more seriously, there's something more complex at play then mere hetero-desire projection. Whedon has explicitly identified as a feminist for a long time, as a heritage from his mother - in fact, some recent interview or other has either him or Dushku setting the fact that both of their mothers are, were, feminists as a point of contact and companionship for both.
In these terms, it might be more useful to think of Whedon's efforts as guided by familial affect and identity, maybe even a strong identification with his mother herself. Though I'd say there's a limit to the use, and the merit, of trying to linearly "justify" an author's choices through biography. But I thought this was a point worth making. |