BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Too young to read?

 
 
Fist Fun
13:36 / 15.07.01
I read alot especially when I was younger. Now being older alot of books are recommended that I have already read and not enjoyed.
Is it possible to be too young to not enjoy abook properly? Is it worthwhile to go back and revalidate?
 
 
Spatula Clarke
14:28 / 15.07.01
Yes.
 
 
Ierne
15:13 / 17.07.01
Absolutely, because you're in a different headspace now than you were 10, 15, however many years ago you first read those books. You'll bring a different perspective to bear on them.
 
 
Ethan Hawke
15:48 / 17.07.01
I used to only half-jokingly advocate censorship of some books for younger readers, because reading things like "The Catcher and the Rye," Neitszche, and "The Stranger" during early adolesence has been responsible for some really horrible ideas among your average all-black wearing wankstain. Then I realized that I'm thisfar from being the same kind of wankstain.

But I still think there are things that most young people shouldn't read, for their own good, dammit!
 
 
Cherry Bomb
16:14 / 17.07.01
My whole family has always mocked me for reading and re-reading the same books, probably since I learned to read. Luckily I've never really cared, because it always made perfect sense to me: regardless of how much I enjoyed a book, a truly well-written book will have ideas and nuances I missed on the first read that I discover on the second, or the third. Take The Poisonwood Bible, for example. I don't know if any of you have read this book, but the story is incredibly engaging. The first time I read it, I flew through it because I wanted to know what would happen next. I knew even then that I was going too fast to catch the many layers that Barbara Kingsolver had woven into her novel, and even then I knew I'd read it again in a few months to examine those layers. Which I did, and upgraded my opinion of this book from "good" to "fucking brilliant!" in the process.

But can you be too young for a book? Maybe. That would never stop me from reading it, however...
 
 
rizla mission
13:10 / 18.07.01
I can't help getting a bit edgy when my 16 year old brother throws my copy of Naked Lunch back to me and says 'that was a laugh, got any more?'.

I mean, I read it when I was about 16, but at least I had the common decency to be shocked and confused..
 
 
Cherry Bomb
14:16 / 18.07.01
That was your generation, Riz.

Step aside.
 
 
Higher than the sun :)
16:42 / 02.08.01
*Side point*
What about the books/authors you feel you should read just becase...
I really can't get into PKD but William Gibson's "Sprawl" trilogy I found easy enough.
Moby Dick. People say its brilliant but I find it boring.
Kurt Vonnegut esp. The Sirens of Titan. Just can't get immersed in.
yet Hienlen, Asimov,John Wyndam, HG Wells. All good informative stories. So it's not a age thing.

[ 02-08-2001: Message edited by: Monica ]
 
 
z3r0
17:40 / 03.08.01
It's like, you never just *read* a good book. A true fine piece of art demands perpetual work from the reader, I think. I'm always re-reading stuff that I've read 5, 8 years ago. It's like a new book altogether.
 
  
Add Your Reply