BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Mystical Judaism Apart From Madonna

 
 
*
23:37 / 13.09.07
First of all, have a very sweet new year.

So I've been engaging Jewish practices more and more in the last year, and becoming a part of an ecstatically-inclined Jewish community this summer has afforded me the opportunity to learn much more. In this thread I'd like to talk about modern ecstatic and mystical practices in Judaism, as well as mystical threads running through all of ancient Jewish scripture (not just the Kabbalah).

I'll start by pointing folks to the book God is a Verb by Rabbi David A. Cooper. This book gives to people with moderate, little, or very little knowledge of Judaism a good foundation in understanding the Kabbalah in a Jewish context.

In addition, I want to point out the work of Rabbi Gershon Winkler, whom I just heard speak not too long ago on the topic of the mystical significance of the High Holy Days, and some of the traditions thereof. Many of his books can be found here, among other things, but I'll start us off with this:

"You find that when the Holy Blessed One desired to create the primeval human, she consulted the ministering angels and said to them: 'Should we make the human?' Said they: 'What is the human that you even bother thinking about them?' (Psalms 8:5). Replied the Creator: 'The human that I wish to create, its wisdom is superior to yours.' What did Creator then do? She gathered all of the animals and wildlife and birds and stood them before the angels, and said: 'Okay, assign them names.' The angels just stood there and didn't know what to call them. She then brought all of them to the primeval human and said to it: 'What are the names of these?' Said the human: 'Master of all the universes! It is fitting to call this one Ox, and to this one it is fitting to call Lion, and to this one Horse, and to that one Camel, and to the other one Eagle,' and so with all the other animals. Said Creator: 'And what about you? What shall be your name?' Said the human: 'Earth Being (Ahdam), because I was created from the Earth (Ahdamah).'" [Midrash Kohelet Rabbah 7:32]

The tradition in Judaism that the human was formed out of the earth is more than a simplistic metaphor or colorful homily. The theme runs continuously and consistently throughout the scriptural, legalistic, midrashic, and kabbalistic avenues of Jewish spiritual teachings. For example, in the Book of Genesis (2:7), the narrator of the creation story informs us that Creator formed the human out of the earth. In the Midrash, the second-century Rabbi Shim'on ben El'azar taught that not only was the human created out of a clump of soil but out of earth gathered from all four directions (Midrash B'reishis Rabbah 8:1). In the Jewish mystical tradition, the Book of the Zohar describes Creator as forming the human out of the earth of the site of the sacred space of the Holy of Holies atop Mount Moriah in Jerusalem, and that each of the four winds of the four directions were then summoned to gift the primeval human with each its particular power and attribute (Zohar, Vol. 1, folio 130b and Vol. 2, folio 23b). These and other sources imply that the human is a living microcosm of the entire planet earth, and whose very soul is imbued with the powers of the four winds. As the second-century Rabbi Shim'on ben Lakish put it: "All that the Holy Blessed One created in the human had been created in the earth to resemble the human" (Midrash Kohelet Rabbah 1:9).

...

The human's relationship to the earth, then, involves a serious covenantal relationship (Job 5:23), which, when betrayed, promises consequences of deprivation (Deuteronomy 11:17) and exile (Leviticus 18:25), and which, when honored, promises longevity and a peaceful life (Job 5:23-26; Deuteronomy 11:21). "The Israelites do not acknowledge the distinction between the psychic and the corporeal. Earth and stones are alive, imbued with a soul, therefore able to receive mental subject-matter and bear the impress of it. The relation between the earth and its owner—is a covenant-relation, a psychic community, and the owner does not solely prevail in the relation. The earth has its nature, which makes itself felt and demands respect" (Johannes Pederson in Israel: Its Life and Culture [Oxford University Press,1959], p. 479).

Ancient Jewish rites for invoking mystical experience and for vision questing also involved the earth, ranging from lying down on the earth with stones arranged around the head (Genesis 28:11), to assuming a fetal-like position while facing the earth (1 Kings 18:42). Weeping, too, is among the rites of achieving mystical experience, employed quite often by the second century Rabbi Shim'on bar Yochai (Sefer HaZohar, Vol. 3, folio 166b) while also assuming the fetal-like position of "head between the knees." It is obvious from these accounts and others that the revelatory experience emanates from the earth: "Converse with the earth, and she will reveal to you" (Job 12:8). Upon completion of his vision, Rabbi Shim'on would kiss the earth he had been facing during the entire quest (Sefer HaZohar, Vol. 3, folio 166b and 168a). As the tenth-century Rabbi Hai Ga'on summed it up: "[The seeker of mystical experience] must fast a certain number of days, put his head between his knees, and whisper many traditional chants and prayers to the earth. Then he is shown the inner mysteries of the earth and is invited to journey through her seven chambers" (Quoted in Neil Asher Silberman's Heavenly Powers: Unraveling the Secrets of the Kabbalah [Grosset Putnam, 1998], p. 36). The mystical experience involved could be some profound wisdom, or it could be the revelation of a technique for performing a specific act of sorcery (Midrash Heichalot Rabati 1:3).

These seven mystical chambers of the earth to which Rabbi Hai Gaon alluded play no less a role in spiritual questing as do the more popularly known Seven Heavenly Chambers. In fact, the ancient teachers gave them both equal importance, and taught that both meet and conjoin in common mystery at the Seventh Chamber (Zohar, Vol. 1, folio 38a). Each chamber corresponds to one of seven names of the earth (which vary in different texts) and wields a particular attribute:

Eretz, meaning Compressed, whose attribute is Wisdom; Adahmah, meaning Clay, whose attribute is Peace; Ar'ka, meaning Inward, whose attribute is Grace; Yabashah, meaning Dry Earth in Relationship to Water, whose attribute is Potential; Tehvel, meaning Habitation, whose attribute is Bounty; Char'vah, meaning Destruction/Eruption, whose attribute is Life; Gey'a, meaning Gulley, whose attribute is Power.

The sanctity of the earth is described in the Jewish tradition beyond its relationship to the human, but also its relationship to the divine, whose presence, we are reminded, is no less in the earth as in the heavens: "And you will then know that I am Infinite One who dwells deep within the earth" (Exodus 8:18). The ancient rabbis further dramatized the sacredness of the earth by over her" (Genesis 2:15).

Ancient Jewish teachings about the sanctity and spirituality of the earth, by Rabbi Gershon Winkler.
 
 
*
23:40 / 13.09.07
I feel it is a good and holy thing to add that I am but an egg, with regards to Jewish practice. I still don't know any Hebrew, at least no more than l'shanah tovah, and I haven't really got a good grasp on what happens in most of the services. So let's all talk and ask questions and muse and learn together.
 
 
Quantum
12:45 / 14.09.07
Let's! I know almost nothing, and I'd love to go over basic Judaism for a start- it's difficult to make sense of esoteric Hebrew magic if you don't know anything about exoteric Jewish beliefs.
Knowledge me up! How does one type Hebraic on the internet? I can't see a Yod key...
 
 
grant
13:31 / 14.09.07
Here: '

Finding a gimel is trickier.

----

Vote #2 for interested!

A lot of what I find myself *most* into are readings of scripture like what's already cooking in the Bible study threads, but I'm also into context and the whole deal.
 
 
EvskiG
17:29 / 14.09.07
Here's your Hebrew aleph-bet:

תשרקצץפףעסנןמםלכךיטחזוהדגבא

Cut and paste the letters as needed.

Want some books to get started on understanding Judaism?

* The Jewish Study Bible

A solid translation from the Hebrew with extensive notes.

* Tree of Souls: The Mythology of Judaism

The myths. Lilith, the angels, Sheol, and Hebrew letters quarreling before creation.

* Jewish Magic and Superstition: A Study in Folk Religion

Jewish folk magic. Involves spit, charms, and a lot of God names.

* Kabbalah

Do you REALLY want to know about Kabbalah?

As hardcore as you can find in English. By Gershom Scholem.

* Born to Kvetch

Want to understand Jewish culture? You need to learn a bit about Yiddish.

More later.
 
 
EvskiG
19:42 / 14.09.07
Oh -- and if you want the absolutely basic basics:

The Complete Idiot's Guide to Understanding Judaism

What I Wish My Christian Friends Knew about Judaism

Jewish Literacy: The Most Important Things to Know About the Jewish Religion, Its People and Its History
 
 
*
00:57 / 15.09.07
Thanks for the booklist, Ev... I will work my way through them as I have time. One caveat: Not all varieties of Jewish culture is shaped by Yiddish, of course. I very much doubt that Ethiopian Jews typically think in Yiddish very much, for instance.

Would be happy to hear more about your own experiences as well.

I was talking with a friend in the congregation today after a deep chanting and meditation service, and something that came up was the basic Kabbalistic creation story that rather than being a direct manifestation of God, as I always thought, creation exists because God has withdrawn itself a little to make some space for something that is not totally God to arise. I'm wrestling with this one, because it seems to contradict the belief that God is everything, which is my background belief, and I haven't found my way to integrate the paradox yet.
 
 
EvskiG
13:08 / 15.09.07
Not all varieties of Jewish culture is shaped by Yiddish, of course.

Right. Yiddish is used only by Ashkenazi Jews (essentially, those of Eastern European descent). Still, I believe that's the tradition of most American and British Jews past and present, from Israel Regardie to Woody Allen.

I was talking with a friend in the congregation today after a deep chanting and meditation service, and something that came up was the basic Kabbalistic creation story that rather than being a direct manifestation of God, as I always thought, creation exists because God has withdrawn itself a little to make some space for something that is not totally God to arise.

The Ari, Isaac Luria (or perhaps his disciple Chaim Vital) came up with that one -- tzimtzum -- in the Sixteenth Century.

Tree of Souls notes that the idea that God can contract his presence and concentrate it in a single place is based on the tradition (in the Genesis and Exodus Rabbah) that God spoke to Moses from between the two staves of the Ark of the Tabernacle (or even from within one square cubit of the Ark).

As for my personal experience -- well, I'm happy to share, but I don't know how much I have worth sharing. Modern American Judaism is a strange combination of culture, stories about suffering, obscure rules, arguments about Israel, and good food.
 
 
*
06:31 / 06.10.07
Observant Jews read the Torah on a yearly cycle, which just turned over yesterday. That means this week is the beginning of the new Torah cycle, and I'm going to try to do Torah study for the next year, every week if I can keep up. So I'll post here about it whenever I remember/have something to say. If you'd like to follow along, please do:

This week's Torah portion: Bereshit, Genesis 1:1-6:8

in-depth parsha with commentary, from Chabad

Commentary on Bereshit from a Renewal Rabbi

Thoughts? I'll get back here with my personal musings by Sunday night.
 
 
EvskiG
13:28 / 06.10.07
You might want to put your musings in the Genesis topic, which already has a bit on the subject.
 
 
*
14:59 / 06.10.07
I'll contribute to both, but being as my musings are going to come from the perspective of esoteric Judaism, and this thread has been slow, I thought I'd enlarge this one to encompass the weekly Torah portion. Which won't be Genesis all the way down. Also the other thread doesn't quite have the format or flow of the parsha.

Or should I start another thread altogether just for parsha reading?
 
 
nyarlathotep's shoe horn
15:55 / 06.10.07
good thread. I don't know much neither 'bout all this, but I have a couple multipart questions.

1) what determines the reading of the Torah cycle? Does it begin on a particular day of the Hebrew Calendar? If so, which one?

2) I've heard it said that the letters of the Hebrew Alphabet can be derived using a candle and a cave wall. Holding up one's hand in various positions casts shadows that strongly resemble Hebrew letters. Anyone hear of such a thing?

thanks

>p
 
 
EvskiG
17:21 / 06.10.07
what determines the reading of the Torah cycle? Does it begin on a particular day of the Hebrew Calendar? If so, which one?

It begins on the 23rd of Tishrei (at sundown on October 4 this year). It's a Jewish holiday, Simchat Torah. It's one of the two holidays (along with Purim) where observant Jews get shitfaced drunk to celebrate.

I've heard it said that the letters of the Hebrew Alphabet can be derived using a candle and a cave wall. Holding up one's hand in various positions casts shadows that strongly resemble Hebrew letters. Anyone hear of such a thing?

Nope, never. Lamed would be kind of tricky, and I'm not sure how you'd deal with the dots in letters like Bet, Kaf, Sin, Shin . . .
 
 
*
05:48 / 08.10.07
I've heard that all the letters in the aleph-bet can be derived from the Magen David, but I hadn't heard the bit about the shadow-puppetry.

So, Bereshit. I went to a Torah study group and there were only two of us there, but we talked quite a bit about the Garden, creation, and giving birth and raising children. I came away from it with these thoughts:

I'm told that Hebrew, at least the Hebrew in the Torah, doesn't do perfect past so much. Where most English translations read something like "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth," the Hebrew actually reads something more like "In the beginning of God being in the middle of creating the heavens and the earth." The Chassidim say that the Torah is eternal, not so much a record of events lost in a distant past but a reflection of the eternal now. If that's so then it seems to me that God is in the middle of creating all the time—emanating Creation and condensing Hirself so that only particular qualities of Hir are visible from certain angles, appearing as distinct "things" and "beings".

It seems to me that the Garden of Eden bit is an intermediate stage between God-As-Unity and created beings as 'separate' from God. Here we're being conceptualized by God, but we're still not discrete living beings clothed apparently in mortal flesh. Not until we emerge from the Garden does Eve get her name, which according to the Midrash Rabbah, means both "progenitor of all life" and "serpent" (the Torah is full of puns, apparently). To me this positions the serpent as midwife—if humans had not decided to separate from God, we would not be fully created beings, and we would not have decided to separate from God without "the evil impulse".

When Eve bears Cain she says something like "I have gotten a human with God." There's a lot in the Jewish that I've been hearing about humanity as cocreators with God, and this looks like one of the roots or first occurrences of that idea.

Something else that struck me was the Lamech story, because I'd never heard or read it. So Cain kills Abel and gets cursed, and he complains that now everyone will know he's a murderer and the first person he comes upon will kill him. So God says (something like) "Therefore, whoever kills Cain, vengeance will be wrought on him sevenfold." And Rashi's commentary here interprets this as meaning that the vengeance wrought on Cain will be delayed for seven generations. What? Seems pretty clear to me that it means that not only will Cain suffer under God's curse, but anyone who kills Cain will suffer something seven times as horrible, or something of that nature. Maybe the Hebrew isn't that straightforward.

Anyway, forward a couple generations to Lamech, one of Cain's descendants. Lamech has a family: wives Adah and Zillah, and three sons, Jabal (a herder), Jubal (a musician), and Tubal Cain (a maker of sharp implements, a blacksmith), and a daughter named Na'ama. Lamech kills somebody offstage. Then he says to his wives something like "Listen, I've killed a man by wounding and a child by bruising. If vengeance for Cain is sevenfold then vengeance for Lamech will be seventy-seven fold." So this sounds to me like "Because my crime is worse, vengeance taken on whomever kills me will be proportionally worse." This story confuses the hell out of me and probably confused the great sages, because a rabbinical tradition says that Lamech actually killed Cain with the help of Tubal-Cain, although not by either of their intentions, and then killed Tubal-Cain by accident as well. Anyway, mark me down as one of those confused by the Lamech story. I suspect that it may have been an old Israelite joke that got slipped into the Torah by mistake.

Two other things: I really like an interpretation of the line "Male and female created he them" as saying that in the very beginning humans were double-sexed beings. And I am puzzled about how God, who is not bounded by time, comes to regret creating humans. I'm having trouble imaging the Holy One stamping Hir foot and grumbling about how humans suck and Who came up with all this Creation business anyway? That's another story I'll be looking for a mysterious spiritual allegory within, because that would be much more satisfying to me than the image a cosmic Divine beyond all conceivable human notions acting rashly, getting fed up with the results, and trying to take it all back.
 
 
*
06:22 / 08.10.07
A post on Simchat Torah:

We removed all of the Torah scrolls from the ark -- big and small, Torahs of all sizes -- and made seven hakafot, processions around the room. Before each hakafah one of the two rabbis present called or sang out the blessing, and then started a song. We sang and drummed as the scrolls were carried and danced around the room. For the first few circuits, we made a kind of London Bridge out of our raised hands, and the scrolls were carried between us. When I was handed a scroll, I waltzed it around the room, holding it close. One person hoisted his scroll into the air the way we lift a bride or groom on a chair at a wedding.

And then we took one scroll into the bigger room, and stood in an enormous circle with all the children in the middle, and passed around a box of surgical gloves, and then unfurled the entire Torah. Each of us helped to hold it up, in our gloved hands. It took a surprisingly long time, and a lot of space, to unroll it all. (A full-sized Torah stretches almost the length of a football field, I'm told.) It amazed me: not only the beauty of the words and the calligraphy, but the graphic design of it, the places where white space shapes the feel of the text. Black fire on white fire.

And we retold the story, looking around the scroll and cherrypicking highlights, reminders of how our narrative has gone in the year that's just ended. We chanted two aliyot from the very end of the scroll -- Moses dies, and the Israelites mourn, and Joshua ben Nun has the spirit of wisdom that Moses transmitted to him; he will lead the people forward, though there will never be another like Moses. And then before the fact of having finished could sink in, we chanted the very beginning of the scroll: suddenly the world is entirely brand-new, ruach elohim hovering over the face of the waters, and God sees what has been created and calls it good. Evening and morning, the first day.

Going from the end to the beginning always knocks me flat. Every year we read this same story, but every year we are different, and see the old story through new eyes. And what seems like the end is always already the beginning. We live in linear time and we live in circular time. We hit the same highlights each year, holidays and seasons and anniversaries, but each year we're in a new place, a new twist in the spiral of our lives.
 
 
EvskiG
14:16 / 09.10.07
Where most English translations read something like "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth," the Hebrew actually reads something more like "In the beginning of God being in the middle of creating the heavens and the earth."

A few modern Jewish translations start with "When God began to create the heavens and the earth . . ."

Kickass translator Robert Alter, who tries to capture the Hebrew poetry and rhythm of the Bible as much as possible, started with this:

When God began to create heaven and earth, and the earth then was welter and waste and darkness over the deep and God's breath hovering over the waters, God said "Let there be light." And there was light.

When Eve bears Cain she says something like "I have gotten a human with God."

Yep. Some early interpreters thought this meant that Cain wasn't Adam's son, but was the son of Eve and an evil angel, which explains why God didn't accept his sacrifice and why he turned out to be a murderer.

So Cain kills Abel and gets cursed, and he complains that now everyone will know he's a murderer and the first person he comes upon will kill him. So God says (something like) "Therefore, whoever kills Cain, vengeance will be wrought on him sevenfold." And Rashi's commentary here interprets this as meaning that the vengeance wrought on Cain will be delayed for seven generations. What?

I think Rashi's commentary meant that vengeance on Cain's family would be delayed until the Flood (seven generations later), when all of Cain's descendants would die and only Noah's family, descended from Cain's younger brother Seth, would survive.

Lamech kills somebody offstage. Then he says to his wives something like "Listen, I've killed a man by wounding and a child by bruising. If vengeance for Cain is sevenfold then vengeance for Lamech will be seventy-seven fold." . . . . This story confuses the hell out of me

This new book by James Kugel, How to Read the Bible, says that the sevenfold vengeance for Cain and seventy-seven fold for Lamech might be because Cain and his descendants represented the Keinites, a local tribe that (unlike most other Canaanite tribes, which took vengeance on a one-for-one basis) killed seven members of other tribes for each one of theirs killed. This story tried to explain why the Keinites were such badasses.
 
 
*
17:39 / 23.11.07
I'm hoping for someone with experience in understanding the Zohar to help me puzzle out this section of Mishpatim:

25. Woe to the world, for people do not know how to be careful when attracting A SOUL INTO A BODY DURING INTERCOURSE by means of the Evil Inclination, which is a stranger. And that priest's daughter, WHICH IS THE SOUL, flies down and finds an edifice, NAMELY A BODY, in a strange man. Since this is the will of its Master, it goes in there to be subdued and has no power, and is not perfected in this world upon its leaving it. It "may not eat of an offering of the holy things," like the other souls that reached perfection in this world.


26. There is something else to this verse, "And if a priest's daughter be married to a stranger." The holy soul is ashamed to be married to a stranger, that is, it is drawn upon a converted proselyte and flies to it from the Garden of Eden in a hidden way, to the edifice, NAMELY THE BODY, that is built of the impure foreskin, SINCE ITS FATHERS WERE NOT CIRCUMCISED. This is the meaning of "a stranger."


27. This is the loftiest secret. On a pillar set for weighing, in the midst of the blowing air, there are scales on the one side, THE RIGHT, and other scales on the other, THE LEFT; true scales on this RIGHT side, and false scales on that LEFT side. These scales are never quiet. The souls go up and down, come and return BY MEANS OF THESE SCALES. Some souls are wronged, when the man OF THE OTHER SIDE has power over the man OF HOLINESS, as written, "a time when one man rules over another to his own hurt" (Kohelet 8:9), assuredly to his own hurt.


28. But the soul that was married to the Other Side CALLED a stranger and was wronged by it, it is "to his own hurt," that of the stranger. And it, "may not eat of an offering of the holy things," AS THE OTHER SOULS, until the Holy One, blessed be He, does with it that which is to be done, THAT IS, HE CORRECTS IT, AS SHALL BE EXPLAINED. CONCERNING THIS the verse says, "And if a priest's daughter be married to a stranger," it shall be so, THAT IT "MAY NOT EAT OF AN OFFERING OF THE HOLY THINGS."


29. There is a secret here about the way souls are wronged. For everything in this world is guided by the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, WHICH IS MALCHUT. When people in the world conduct themselves according to the good side, RECONCILED BY THE CENTRAL COLUMN, the scales are balanced and are tipped to the good side. When they conduct themselves according to the Evil Side, the scales tip to that side, THE OTHER SIDE, which takes all the souls that were on the scales at that time and wrongs them.


30. But it is "to his own hurt," THE OTHER SIDE'S, because those souls subdue all they find of the Evil Side and consume it. And indicative for that is the holy Ark, which was violated by the Philistines who had power over it to their own hurt, SINCE THEY AND THEIR DEITIES WERE PLAGUED BY IT. Here too, the souls wronged by the Other Side, it is to its own hurt.
 
 
nyarlathotep's shoe horn
18:32 / 23.11.07
SMI - so much information.

thanks for posting all the links, quotes and sources. My whole journey into mysticism started with the question "what's the whole tree of life thing about anyway?" which led me to the Kabbalah, and a whole host of other interpretations...

I felt the Garden of Eden was the *separation of heaven and earth* part of the creation story. In many traditions, a trickster figure severs the connection holding the heavens to the earth, which also signifies the beginning of time, and our earthly existence.

The serpent fulfills the role of the trickster.
 
 
EvskiG
17:31 / 26.11.07
I'm hoping for someone with experience in understanding the Zohar to help me puzzle out this section of Mishpatim

First, as the mandatory disclaimer, I'm not even remotely an expert on the Zohar.

Second, remember that while it's now a central text of kabala and Jewish mysticism, the Zohar probably was written in 13th century Spain by Moses de Leon, and should be interpreted with that in mind.

Turning to the text, it's a mystical interpretation of Leviticus 22:12: "And if a Kohen's daughter is married to a non-Kohen, she may [no longer] eat of the separated holy things." That is, if a woman of the (most elite, priestly) Kohen portion of the Levite tribe marries a Jew who is not a Kohen, she can't eat from holy sacrifices reserved for the Kohens. (Sorry, Mom.)

Pretty irrelevant now, since Jews haven't had a temple or temple sacrifices for almost 2000 years.

So -- one possible interpretation of the text at issue:

25: The "priest's daughter" in the Biblical verse is the soul, and the "stranger" is the body. When people have sex, they may be governed by "the evil inclination" (yetzer hara) -- in this case, probably lust. The text suggests that if one is governed by lust during sex, and that sex results in conception, the lust could corrupt the incoming soul.

26. This one seems to suggest that the human body is by its nature impure, and that the pure soul passes from the Garden of Eden (or heaven, or paradise) to the impure body "in a hidden way" (through intercourse?) because it is embarrassed to pass from a pure to an impure state.

27-29. These suggest reincarnation -- that souls "go up and down, come and return." Actions and wrongs from previous lives may have to be addressed in the current life before they can "eat of an offering of the holy things."

It all seems like a bit of crap speculative theology to me. Interesting, maybe, but without much in the way of practical application.

Does anyone have a different interpretation?
 
 
EvskiG
14:53 / 29.11.07
For a more detailed discussion of those verses, you may want to look here and here.
 
  
Add Your Reply