BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


A prose piece for your perusal

 
 
Glenn Close But No Cigar
13:38 / 09.07.07
The Cathedral is the Bishop's seat, where the Bishop is enthroned.

Where the Bishop sits, the Cathedral rises.

So a spine is bent. So a spine straightens.

So it follows.

The Cathedral was once a migratory thing, its mobility the mobility of the Bishops' body, of his bones and cushioning break-fluids. The Cathedral was action, not architecture. It was the act of sitting, not the seat. This is no longer true.

What is true is that the Cathedral is in the city; that it is what makes the city the city. (We might imagine a Cathedral built on the precise line that marks the urban boundary. It would have no material thickness, but would nevertheless be always expanding, always expanding).

What is true is that the Cathedral may be Simple or it may be Patriarchal. These are ascending degrees of dignity, an ecclesiastical seating plan.

What is true is that the Cathedral is disintegrating.

Such things have their reasons.

Where the Bishop sits, the Cathedral rises.

So a spine is bent. So a spine straightens.

So it follows.

It begins with the windows. Thousands of tiny panes shudder in their lead surrounds then fall to their floor, smashing and scattering. The nave looks full of dead dragonflies. The glassless windows look like cartoons. Light (it passage into the Cathedral for so long filtered, for so long tempered and spangled with dyes) floods in, and everything is suddenly all sky and stone, all blue and blonde and grey. The roof is next. First its plaster and paintwork falls downwards in dandruff-y clumps, then the ribbed vaulting buckles and collapses like an imploded chest. For a moment, it seems like the walls - with their buttresses, their beetle-y exoskeleton - will remain standing, but then they too begin to falter. The nave crumbles into nothingness, then the crossing, the transept, the choir, the presbytery, and then finally the sanctuary. Dust puffs up from winded prayer cushions. The font bobs with rubble.

Such things have their reasons.

For a long as anybody can remember, the city's boys had gathered in the Cathedral grounds. Sometimes they would kick at the building's stonework, or would pitch pebbles at its windows. Sometimes they would sing so loud that they believed (in their perfumed drunkenness) that the whole edifice would come tumbling down. They weren't sure why they did this, but it had something to do with being boys, and with becoming men. Still, the Cathedral stood, until it didn't. It was elevated, until it became a plan.

Where the Bishop sits, the Cathedral rises.

So a spine is bent. So a spine straightens.

So it follows.
 
 
All Acting Regiment
19:25 / 09.07.07
Good. What informed it? Lud Heat et al? Back with more later.
 
 
Alex's Grandma
22:35 / 10.07.07
This could well be my fault (my intellect, once a shiny, flashing katana, is now a rusted bread knife, arguably) but I'm not entirely sure what you're trying to get at here.
 
 
All Acting Regiment
03:59 / 11.07.07
Coming back to this, I'm assuming that this is one of those pieces that's meant to be, not so much a story, but a kind of descriptive passage.

It's good at being what it is, but I have doubts about the sort of thing it is - there aren't characters (despite the cathedral and the bishop being quasi-characters) or a strong plot (which is not to say that nothing happens, or that a strong plot is 100% necessary all the time). A lot of people have been showing me things like this and asking me what I think, and often what I think is that they would make a good prose poem. I suggest having a look at the wiki article - it's very informative.

None of the above means I didn't find the piece evocative, interesting and sensitive, and with a hint of the Symbolistes about it, which is always good - but were you to chisel it down into something like Eliot's "Hysteria" or Baudelaire's "Spleen de Paris", I think it could be even better.

 
 
Alex's Grandma
03:25 / 12.07.07
While I've never met him, IRL, I'm reasonably sure 'And the horse you rode in on' (as a brief aside, could you consider shortening this, ATHYRIO - it's a bit of a schlep to type, otherwise) knows what a prose poem is, AR.
 
 
All Acting Regiment
14:21 / 12.07.07
I know, apologies if I came across as snarky, I just like to throw ideas around.
 
 
Alex's Grandma
21:08 / 12.07.07
Although ATHYRIO is a great name. A hero's name, if you will.

Rubble, however, as it is pretty much by definition, especially in this case, stone, does not bob.
 
 
Glenn Close But No Cigar
21:14 / 16.07.07
You could always just call me Horse, I suppose, AG / MES. Just so long as you call me.

Rubble does not, indeed, bob, whether it is in a font or not. Doubtless there are those who would argue that the font's Holy water would lead to some sort of Heavenly buoyancy, but I'm happy to acknowledge it as a writerly balls-up.

I do, though, know what a prose poem is, and I suppose if I'd wanted this piece to be that, it would have been. FYI, Ian Sinclair wasn't an influence, AR - I've not read him yet, although he's on my to-read list.

As to what I'm getting at, AG, I guess what I'm attempting to do is to think about what happens when a social structure becomes a built structure, and how that built structure might be itself unbuilt, or reversed, by a new social structure. Sort of a palindrome, or a spine that telescopes at each end.
 
  
Add Your Reply