|
|
X boards public transport with easily transmissible drug-resistant infection Y - Z1, Z2 etc etc etc are at risk of contracting a fatal disease. In this case it was TB, it could've been MRSA, it could've been the next Spanish flu; it could've been on a boat, bus, train, tram or whatever. Even the streets.
Where can we draw the line between the common good, in this case public health, and the exercise of free choice and the basic right of unrestricted movement? Asked Kali.
How is being sick akin to being a criminal? I ask.
Have we in the highly developed world wrongly left public health to the uneasy collusion between state and the market these days, without as citizens and tribespeople evolving effective communal and "non-engineered", small-scale health activities, institutions and technologies?
In fact, what IS public health in regards to infectious diseases these days (specifically those where people are vectors or aid the spread of vectors)? Sanitary measures or exile as in pre-germ-theory times? Hygiene as in the pre-antibiotic era? In short, what are our potential political solutions in the post-"golden bullet" times?
Or, what Kali jus' said - good post.
There's a lab thread in this as well! |
|
|