|
|
So I have been trying to come back to the poetry game lately, and, um, I have a doubt about the say syntactical orthodoxy of a certain passage (by which I mean is said passage both acceptable and understandable - albeit probably sounding archaic - as a variation of the structurally legit form "adjective + substantive"?). I have found a nice piece about the order of adjectives here, but this page really doesn't offer much advice on the adjective+substantive thing, so I figured I'd show you the problematic piece and you could give me some pointers.
"And then what?", you ask. Why, then huuugs!, I say.
Here goes nothing:
Lux æterna
so is blind hope entwined,
like a coarse candle wick
that is weaved from the lick
of the tongue to the tip
of the aging gum ridge
and the pursing of lips
which serves as a bridge
to the velar plosive
and the extinguishing hiss
of a candle votive...
(cont.)
So the line I need help with is this last one, "of a candle votive". Because the "proper" usage would have to be "votive candle", right?, but there's no way I'm giving up on that rhyme, so, er, tell me how wrong the beastie sounds the way I did it, please?
Thanks a bunch. And let me add a proleptically placed:
Huuugs! |
|
|