it took me most of last week, but I finished Alice in Sunderland. i just wish it was like another three hundred pages long, i could read that shit forever.
it's difficult to know where to start or what to say about such a sprawling and yet intensely concentrated piece. I think i'll step back fronm the text a bit, go on a more general ramble...
the immediate preursors to AIS are I feel the Eddie Campbell adaptations of the Alan Moore spoken word pieces, released I think in one volume as 'A Disease of Language'. Reason I say this is the lecture-theatre format, the site-specific inspiration, the historical breadth, the multimedia visuals, as well as the literary history psychogeographic themes (great review here by the way.) does anyone know of any other predecessors, aside from understanding comics and that, that have this factual, deliberately non-dramatised format?
as I say, the direct address really works for me, though i'm aware the unapologetic didacticism may grate for some. (i wonder how i'd feel if i wasn't interested in AIC's core subjects myself). i think maybe i'm trying to make a point that this docudrama style of comics has a real advantage over prose 'novels of ideas' that might seek to cover similar ground, but have to make concessions of character and plot in order to hook the reader. in comics the lovely pictures can be the hook, the bits that the reader can concentrate on when their attention lulls and they just want to enjoy the read and not think too much for a bit. AIS, while being a big old hippyish slab of stuff, had a freshness and verve to it, not quite drama, not quite journalism, not quite history, a surfeit of tones and perspectives that i can't think of any other medium being able to handle. pure comics in other words. anyone else read it yet? |