I've read "The Philosophy of Composition", but other than the insight into the construction of a fictional piece, what struck me most immediately was the statement which regarded the death of a beautiful woman as the ultimate in artistic literary expression. It'd be an odd statement, only, if it hadn't come from Poe. And, of course, Poe's texts are full of female corpses (those prematurely buried, those murdered, those that slowly waste away).
Of the tales I've read Morella, Ligeia, The Fall of the House of Usher, Berenice, and I realise it isn't an uncommon reading, I was lead to examine them psychoanalytically. The Nightmare logic present in Poe's tales are reason enough to employ a gauze like this, I suppose. The threat of Berenice's vagina-dentata is clear enough, Ligeia's lack of paternal name (and explicit mention of the narrator/protagonist's mentally dwarfed and childlike status in the wake of her prodigious knowledge in the text) lead me somewhat to thoughts of Kristeva (the corpse and the monsterous feminine), The House of Usher brought me to thoughts of the horrific resurfacing of a feminine repressed.
Yet again, I thought of the womb (or mindscape like) interiors favoured by Poe and the males uncomfortable relationship to them...
My question being, I suppose, how much of Poe's "horror" relies, if not all of it, upon a latent (or pretty blatant) construction of the feminine as monstrous? Is it all that centred on fear of the feminine (or have I missed something)? |