BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Adbusters: Design wants to be free

 
 
Tom Coates
14:51 / 25.07.01
Article

quote: Were looking for inventors, artists, dreamers and designers to lead the way towards Open Source Design: free-for-all solutions to design problems outside the commercial box. Sign up, then feed the brainstorm. Our website and listserv will keep you in touch with each design breakthrough as it happens.

Anyone interested in participating in this kind of stuff? There's a mailing list to sign up to...
 
 
Mr Tricks
17:57 / 31.07.01
What do you mean as participating?

Like as representing the Barbelith Underground? That could be fun...
 
 
Saturn's nod
14:04 / 05.10.06
Adbusters: since the link top the specific project above 404s, here's a new one for the front page of the site, submissions guidelines.

Anyone know what kind of content and traffic volume their email list has at present?
 
 
glitch
07:43 / 05.12.06
I am a member of the Melbourne Jammers mailing list. The Adbusters jammer groups are regionised. So I don't know what they are like in other parts of the world. Our list is fairly active. Although I have to say I have never been to a meeting I do occasionally post to the list. I regularly recieve emails from other members about various actions, usually to do with days such as Buy Nothing Day, group meetings and interesting articles and info. I think these groups can be very effective and worthwhile. The Melbourne group has a guy who has basically taken on the leadership role. Which seems to be necessary and keeps the group going.
 
 
chaated
13:30 / 04.01.07
I'd be interested in joining, although I've always thought that AdBusters was overpriced as a magazine. Maybe I'm just poor.
 
 
camofleur
14:55 / 25.01.07
You're not wrong. Very overpriced.

When you consider the very sparse use of text throughout the magazine, it's easy to come away feeling slightly short-changed.
 
 
neutral
15:06 / 25.01.07
Yup, it seems somewhat ironic to buy a 'culture jam'. You may as well download society of the spectacle online for free.
 
 
MattShepherd: I WEDDED KALI!
15:31 / 25.01.07
But I'm guessing that maybe they don't have the #1 method of magazine publishers to make money and defray costs available to them, yes? Other magazines don't jam all those car and jewelry ads in there for giggles.
 
 
neutral
19:00 / 25.01.07
You're absolutely right. However, both conventional advertising and adbusters style culture jamming don't allow the individual autonomous thought. They are both promoting a lifestyle to the individual. If adbsuters was genuine then it wouldnt exist as a glossy magazine, the idea behind it could just exist and individuals could actually physically culture jam themselves (i know a lot of people do,albeit in the style of adbusters ),which was kind of the purpose of Situationism itself - involving oneself in making and actively observing.
 
 
MattShepherd: I WEDDED KALI!
19:53 / 25.01.07
If adbsuters was genuine then it wouldnt exist as a glossy magazine

Not sure I'm buying that. Part of Adbusters' effectiveness is entirely built on the strength of satire, and context is a huge part of satire. The "glossy magazine" puts them on the same stands as the magazines that perpetuate and propogate the culture they're trying to subvert. If it was a grubby 'zine that got sold from behind the counter at the local head shop, it wouldn't work the way it was originally intended -- catch the eye of the glossy magazine consumer, plant some seeds, satirize effectively, etc. etc.

Satire vehicles aside, even, I don't see any disconnect between being "genuine" and producing a nice magazine to help spread ideas you care about. They're not preventing anyone from doing their own culture jamming, and have probably inspired thousands to try it who otherwise wouldn't have given it a thought.

Some of the best countercultural material in the world has been produced by major book publishers and record labels and sold, for money, in stores, by people who make a profit. That crazy word at the top of the screen, for instance, comes from a for-profit comic written by a guy that got paid for it, and I don't think that makes it any less "genuine."

And I don't think anyone at Adbusters is raking in dough from the magazine. Haven't researched that'un, admittedly.
 
 
Triplets
19:04 / 28.01.07
the idea behind it could just exist

Hi neutral. Care to unpack this a little? How would the adbusters exist without being adbusters the magazine? Where would it exist? In the ether?

They are both promoting a lifestyle to the individual

Almost every organisation or piece of advertising promotes a lifestyle choice. From FHM to adbusters there will be something in there saying "hey, our way of doing things is the best". Greenpeace wants you to buy into a lifestyle, albeit an ecofriendly one. FHM wants you to shag fast cars and drive fit birds. Both of them use magazines.

As matt says adbusters uses the "lifestyle options" glossy magazine format in order to insinuate itself in places a "genuine" counter-culture 'zine wouldn't be able to.

and individuals could actually physically culture jam themselves (i know a lot of people do,albeit in the style of adbusters )

Do you mean the "glossy magazine format" here? And, if you do, does this make their efforts any less genuine?
 
 
Jackie Susann
21:11 / 31.01.07
which was kind of the purpose of Situationism itself - involving oneself in making and actively observing.

Um wasn't the Situationists' main activity publishing a journal where they poured scorn on anyone actually doing anything (not counting distant groups they could abstract at leisure i.e. 'these Watts rioters are like totally critiquing the Spectacle!')?
 
 
bjacques
12:34 / 07.02.07
They wrote great rants too. The Hacienda and parts of On the Poverty of Student Life remind me that the years in which I was besotted with the Situationists weren't totally wasted. And it seems like almost everyone who was kicked out was better off than everyone who stayed in.

Anyway, I've gotta keep the above in mind while I'm checking out the Centraal Museum (in Utrecht) show on the Situationists.
 
 
Saturn's nod
17:50 / 08.02.07
Do the editors of Adbusters send a free copy to contributors? If so I think that adds another dimension to the magazine, as a community product. People who subscribe or pay for it at magazine vendors are supporting the activism; it's expensive to stay current with Adbusters if you don't contribute so it ought to encourage people to send stuff in and improve the product.
 
 
MattShepherd: I WEDDED KALI!
18:28 / 08.02.07
Not sending a free copy to contributors would be beyond freakish. "Contributors' copies" are the mainstay of publications that can't afford to pay their writers and artists, from fiction 'zines through culture-jamming megaliths.
 
 
Happy Dave Has Left
19:46 / 08.02.07
Can someone explain to me in small words what culture jamming is?

Wikipedia gives me only buzzwords like 'disrupting the mediasphere'. Seems a bit Nathan Barley-esque... What's it all about then?
 
 
Saturn's nod
21:23 / 08.02.07
I think it means participating in the media with intent to advance your social or political agenda.
 
 
Happy Dave Has Left
21:55 / 08.02.07
Campaigning then?
 
 
MattShepherd: I WEDDED KALI!
22:09 / 08.02.07
No official word here, Joyous, but back when I was reading Adbusters -- which was like 12 years ago -- it was basically about screwing around with the prefabricated images that were being bundled and sold as prerequisites for happiness. Bear in mind that this was pre-Pop Chomsky and that the world is a lot more savvy now than it was a decade ago... it was relatively revolutionary to get a bunch of people together and go around sticking word balloons on bus shelter posters of jean models so they were saying "I NEED A SANDWICH." Mixing the cat food in with the caviar in the grocery store. That sort of thing.

It's probably evolved as a concept now, and it seems a bit obvious when I look back on it, but at the time it felt really bold and gutsy.

A lot of "culture jamming" has been incorporated into the culture now, though.
 
 
saintmae
09:25 / 10.02.07
I think the definitive trait of culture jamming is the reuse of existing cultural icons to advance a subversive or counter-cultural message, generally using illegal means (graffiti, copyrighted images) or grassroots means (self-publishing, group works with less emphasis on the individual).

Matt points out that a lot of the techniques of the culture jammers have been incorporated into mainstream society. I'd like to point out the differences between pastiche and bricolage here.

Pastiche is cultural collage using pieces from diverse sources and creating a new whole, and so is bricolage - with one key difference relating to privilege. Pastiche comes from a place of social power, a place where it's *ok* for you to take anything you might want. A good stereotype of pastiche is the white liberal hippie who pairs African fabrics with Asian art and photographs of Europe to create their ideal home. Nothing wrong with that, but we have to recognize that they're doing this because they can, because in a lot of ways they have cultural power - financial power to buy all this stuff, social power for the opportunity to pick and choose the best of each culture without having to take the downsides.

Bricolage is very similar, but the collage of bricolage is working with diverse cultural elements because they're *all you have* - the way that a poor artist will have mismatched furniture, because that's what they have to work with. An artist working from this perspective might design something using elements of several cultures, but they do this because this is all they know or have access to. Consider someone growing up in poverty and taking the handouts they can get - their art is going to be perhaps just as diverse as a richer person, but the influences come from chance rather than choice.

And of course as Matt said... it turns back into pastiche when the mismatched furniture becomes an imitated look sold by all the fashionable department stores for thousands.

Culture jamming is, in its best incarnations, a self-aware ironic sort of pastiche aimed at making privilege more obvious in some way. It's saying, "yes, I can make these choices... and they are ridiculous."

One aspect of culture jamming that isn't touched on as much is the opportunity to piggyback messages. I like doing pop magic(k) ritual because people go away with some sort of ritual consciousness attached to whatever cultural icon I used. Last year, I did a soul journey through the Egyptian book of the dead using muppets, and it pleases me that now everyone who came to that sees Kermit and thinks of Egypt. If you use the McDonald's golden arches M logo enough times to write the word "Murder" - people are going to reflexively think of this when they see the logo. Even if they still like McDonald's, this is going to be somewhere in the back of their heads. Done well, culture jamming is a sort of memetic parasite that uses all the work the original idea did to get into your brain, but turns the message back on itself. I only have to write Murder with the McDonald's M a couple of times to get it stuck in your brain, but McDonald's spent billions of dollars advertising what is now in part *my* idea.

I haven't been sleeping well lately, so I hope that was as coherent as I meant it to be.
 
 
Happy Dave Has Left
11:31 / 10.02.07
That's a great answer, and very cogent. I must admit my first reaction on reading the wikipedia page was 'damn hipsters!' but this has given me some food for thought.
 
  
Add Your Reply