BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Male Feminist Blogs

 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
12:20 / 14.02.07
... Or masculinist if you prefer. I'm not after hateful, narrow-minded Gorean-Fantasy blogs, but more blogs on the same principles of feminism, but written by the men or male-identified. Any suggestions?
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
12:34 / 15.02.07
No-one?
 
 
Phex: Dorset Doom
14:24 / 15.02.07
Well this is depressing, but I half expected it.
Now, there's a lot of men out there who could justifiably be dubbed feminists, and I hope I and many of the male board members here would be among them. But a man making and regularly updating a feminist blog would run into problems from the get-go. Who would he be writing for? Women already know chauvinism and patriarchy are bad, and they don't need a man telling them how he knows their pain any more than I need every. goddamn. caucasian. person. I meet telling me how they teared up at Schindler's List or went on a school trip to Auschwitz. If it's for men then there's possibly a gap there. I could see how say, Askmen.com* could have a 'How not to be an asshole to women' column which could educate readers in feminism's history and practice. A blog would be harder to pull off, since men who are already assholes to women and take pride in that fact would avoid it and men who don't realize that they're assholes to women would believe they didn't need it. You'd end up preaching to the choir, which is useless.

*= Please note, I'm not saying Askmen.com readers are misogynists, but it's a very widely read site, 5 million unique readers a month, so articles there could do some good.
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
15:06 / 15.02.07
Well, I'm not expecting men to call themselves feminists necessarily, but I'm looking for blogs by male fellow-travellers, with a male perspective on the same basic issues.
 
 
*
02:26 / 16.02.07
So these are more about these guys' lives and thoughts, but they're also worth reading. Now and then there is feminism.

Tom Cho's New Blog
Tom Cho's Old Blog
Jay Sennet's Website and Blog

The fact that these guys are all trans is much more about my reading habits, I'm sure, than about needless generalizations about trans men and non-trans men.
 
 
stabbystabby
07:11 / 16.02.07
http://www.nopod.blogspot.com/
http://gayfeminist.blogspot.com/
http://www.popmatters.com/features/030226-blackfeminists.shtml
http://alumni.buffalo.edu/drpl/node/1887
http://feministallies.blogspot.com/
http://www.amptoons.com/blog/
http://ezraklein.typepad.com/
 
 
Saturn's nod
16:33 / 24.04.07
Hugo Schwyzer, too.
 
 
This Sunday
17:00 / 24.04.07
No blogs come to mind, but I don't really do the blog thing, much. Print material I can provide, at least, I can provide suggestions.

There's Robert Bly's Iron John business. If the thought of Bly and/or his drums don't cause you physical pain as they do me.

Or, John Gordon's 'The Myth of the Monstrous Male' which is surely anthologized somewhere.

McGill University Press put out a book on misandry in the feminist movement, not too long ago. I haven't looked into it myself, but some people I vaguely trust have said it had some good points.

The problem I have is that I'm not going to be a masculinist or a feminist or whatever, because I'm not really convinced at all that those are the qualifiers one should be promoted for (or promoting). I try not to write off either end and lightening the terms or shifting the focus from the emphasis of one over the other, is akin to the difference between someone shouting 'brown power' and someone shouting 'white power'. Regardless of intent or the face put on things, the motivation seems horribly the same, as do many of the end results.

I like people. Couldn't give a damn what color, how many limbs, or what sort of plumbing they have. I struggled with that a bit, as a kid, because I wanted to be bigoted. Loads of other people were, children and adults. But it just annoyed me, and when I caught myself doing it, I annoyed me.

A feminist, to my mind, would have to, at some point be willing to say something like 'You can't do that to her, that's a woman!' or a masculinist 'that's a man!' and all. I don't think there are things one can do in front of X that one can't in front of Y, on anything other than an individual basis. Or to them. Anything broader in scope that a one-by-one consideration is going to present flaws, be exceptionally limiting, and likely to be very rude when trying not to be.

It's like saying you can't tell that joke in front of Person X because they're black or white or Jewish-Albanian via Texas. For reasons of religion, political party, or something chosen, yes, alter your behaviour to be polite, but something that doesn't logistically require them to behave or respond under certain parameters, such as those being a devout Mormon might require, I just don't see the point.

Which puts me and a lot of other people outside proper feminist/masculinist lines and into the extropist category, which isn't very useful as a category.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
19:07 / 24.04.07
Feminism 101, DD. Stat.
 
 
This Sunday
19:17 / 24.04.07
Yeah, I deserved that. What I mean is that, there's what feminism means and then there's what it is and unfortunately, I think the terms tainted enough to drop it. I've taught/covered some of feminism, doing theory courses, but I... well, I really do think once a term's outlived or outgrown its usefulness you have to let it go. And terms like 'Latino Lit' or 'feminist thought' really are the sort to go. I'm in good company; at least, Gayatri Spivak tends to agree, although she'd have a go at coalescing a proper meaning to the term and thereby recovering it. That's more work than I put into things.

I've never been so thankful that Spivak is less lazy than I am.

But really, it's a case of 'I won't agree to the tenets until we've all settled what they are and that they aren't a literal reading of the titular term.'
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
19:27 / 24.04.07
Right. Well, Feminism 101 might be a good place to discuss that.
 
 
This Sunday
19:28 / 24.04.07
The thread! Argh. Thought you were chiding me. Felt very appropriate.

Your very ambiently professorial, Haus.

And now I feel chided again.
 
  
Add Your Reply