|
|
Funnily enough the first time I ever heard of Bat For Lashes was when I was DJing in Brighton and the sound guy at the venue said to me, rather worriedly, "You're not going to play any Bat For Lashes, are you?" - when I told him I didn't have any, he was very relieved, and implied this was for reasons of more than musical taste.
It doesn't really mean anything to me – I'm as suspicious of people who complain about "scenesters" as I am about scenesters themselves, and even if there's the beginnings of a negative consensus about her as a person, it might only serve to illustrate that, as someone once observed, Jealous Ones Still Envy.
I'm only really familiar with 'What's A Girl To Do?' (the title of which is surely a knowing reference to Cristina of Ze Records fame, no?), and I think that's great. It's a brittle, wintry song that picks over the bones of a dead relationship and is unflinchingly specific about the cause of death.
It seems a little farcical to accuse Bat For Lashes of being "commercialised" - they are/she is hardly Girls Aloud or The Killers. I know there's a difference between a commercialised sound and being actually commercially successful, but I'm still not sure what's being meant here, or how you'd actually go about quantifying which artists Bat For Lashes are more or less commercialised than, etc... Or why you'd bother, really.
Self-consciously spooky and kooky, on the other hand, Bat For Lashes do/does seem to be, but actually I always find that to be equally true of those acts who've been canonised for being, y'know, quirky originals (Bjork, Kate Bush, etc), and it doesn't detract from my enjoyment of their music either. |
|
|