BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


International Year of Polytheism

 
  

Page: 1(2)

 
 
Ticker
12:38 / 16.02.07
I think that the negative capability philosophy is a good one.

It is the most functional perspective I carry in my pocket when dealing with religious issues. There's an entire list of questions I'm not worried about (afterlife, the Beginning, the End) simply because I list them under the heading 'Unknowable'. I have some pet theories and ideas about these things but if someone tells me I'm wrong I'm not prone to being deeply shaken.

It also allows me to happily accept other people's truths as absolute for them without polite doubt. If someone believes we're all going to a big volcano disco party at the end of time that's fine by me. I don't feel the need to argue.
 
 
Unconditional Love
13:15 / 16.02.07
Perhaps each persons spirituality is right for them where they are now, it grows as they and there experiences grow, what may begin as an individualistic (monotheistic?) spirituality can grow into a communal (Polytheistic?) through interaction, individual beliefs become shared and permutations occur within interpretation, reiteration, where spiritual communities share no common text, the spirit of the ideas are embodied in those that carry them, everybody has there own spin (polytheism) but the spirit of commonality remains familiar (monotheism).
 
 
Papess
16:00 / 16.02.07
If someone believes we're all going to a big volcano disco party at the end of time that's fine by me.

Show me proof and give me the address!

Seriously, I feel the same way about not feeling the need to disprove others. I am not prone to feelings of infringement, even if I find methods distasteful. I do understand the need from some to protect their chosen/appointed/...deities and beliefs. Much in the same way I understand the need to preserve a language or culture, there is a need to preserve, or at least observe traditions in magickal and religious practice, even if just for the sake of posterity. There has to be room for the tolerance of experimentation, but also, when experimenting, a respect for the tradition(s). I think this is a thoughtful balance, or compromise, that is acceptable for Temple purposes, imho.

Sometimes, however, people feel that in order to validate their own beliefs, they have to get others to believe as they do. Or that if someone has a different experience of the deities or certain techniques, than they do, then it must be hooey. It might be, but it doesn't really upset me if it is, either. It is someone's attempt at understanding, is how I look at it. No matter how shallow I think it may be, is really none of my concern. I should concern myself with my own practice. It all becomes some stupid deified soap opera, otherwise, and is quite distracting.

Help me out here, I'm working with a Mercury retrograde!
 
  

Page: 1(2)

 
  
Add Your Reply