BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


2007: What are you currently reading?

 
  

Page: 1 ... 56789(10)

 
 
Evil Scientist
14:12 / 29.10.07
but the writing, ugh.

You think? I've always found him one of the better "galactic armageddon" writers around. Absolution Gap is probably not his greatest novel though (for my money that'd be either Chasm City or the non-Rev.Space Century Rain).

I'm currently fighting the urge to buy "The Prefect". That along with Robert Morgan's "Black Man" and "Soon I Will Be Invincible" will form the triumvirate that'll last me on my outbound trip to Australia next year.
 
 
Hallo, Paper Spaceboy
18:54 / 29.10.07
Went to a secondhand bookshop last week on a whim, and acquired three Doc Savage pulps, a Harlan Ellison book about gangs, and Sam Delaney's Triton (to warm me up for reading Dhalgren and actually making it through). Hitting the second chapter of Triton and I'm quite enjoying it. His language is very, very electric and even when it doesn't feel as though much is happening, per se, the prose is alive enough to propel me forward.
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
08:59 / 31.10.07
Haven't done one of these for a while.

I've just finished Labyrinth by Kate Mosse, a story split between the France of today and that of around 500 years ago, involving castles, knights, the Cathars and the Holy bloody Grail. It's all right as a semi-historical thriller but is 600 pages and is frankly, a good 200 pages too long. The story starts quickly, but then gets bogged down in a middle section where little really happens for quite a while, before rallying in the last 150 pages.

I'm now reading How to Bring Up Your Parents by Emma Kennedy, a very funny guide to how to manage your parents that has already caused frequent bouts of giggling in public places as I read it on the tube.
 
 
Nocturne
23:04 / 02.11.07
I just finished The Algebraist by Iain M Banks. I'd never read any space opera before, and I rather enjoyed it. Was this book intended to make fun of the genre though? The bad guy was so eeeevil I had trouble taking him seriously. (His bodily modifications included diamond teeth and an enlarged penis that ejects truth serum. So he could rape the people he wanted to interrogate.)

The Dwellers were completely alien at first, and through all the main character's love/hate relationship with them I actually left the book with some kind of respect for them. And I loved the way he described the ending of the war between the AIs and the biologicals. I would elaborate, but I don't want to spoil it.

I picked this up because of recommendations I'd come across on barbelith. Is there anything else you'd care to recommend?
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
09:48 / 04.11.07
Hmmm, anything by China Mieville, if you haven't already. His Bas-Lag trilogy run in the order of Perdido Street Station, The Scar and The Iron Council but don't really need to be read in order as there isn't much by way of returning characters or 'owt. King Rat is a bit of a misfire really.
 
 
Psych Safeling
18:36 / 05.11.07
I finished Infinite Jest on holiday, having started it around two months ago and had difficulty with trying to read it in 15 minute commuting bursts. Wow, what a book. I absolutely loved it. No problems with the lack of resolution - I realised about 2/3 of the way through (should have been earlier, in retrospect, thinking about the structure and thematics, and, indeed, title...) that this wasn't going to be a neatly tailored epic. Who said literature should be served in instant gratification flavour, anyway?

I know the writing has annoyed some people, but I didn't find it pretentious at all - in fact I found him a pretty generous writer given his clearly extraordinary intellect (though I don't think he really got the hang of the Mean Value Theorem... or maybe that was Pemulis). What sticks on this note is the claim Orin (I think?) made at some point re JOI - 'he just wants to entertain'. This is a writer putting his soul on the page for our delectation. I certainly appreciated it. I can't remember a book I have been so absolutely consumed, obsessed, exhilarated and delighted by (in spite of really pretty depressing subject matter).

Followed up with Making Money by Terry Pratchett (silly and sloppy, but it was always going to suffer by comparison) and now Blood Meridian. I'm excited about this but superficially it feels like a mild struggle (I've only read about four pages) because it's in the same font as my copy of The Sound and The Fury. Yes, I am that shallow.
 
 
Janean Patience
07:10 / 06.11.07
The Algebraist's bad guy was so eeeevil I had trouble taking him seriously.

Yeah, I thought that was a serious flaw and wondered where this exaggerated character was going. And not really anywhere, it turned out. Banks can make questionable writing decisions. I wonder if the character was actually meant to be frightening, or if the author was aware of his absurdity? I hope the latter.

I just can't face Bury My Heart At Wounded Knee after about 150 pages. Every chapter follows the same pattern: white settlers decide they want Indian land, push into it, there are a few skirmishes, the government sends soldiers, the Indians attempt to make a treaty and make many fine speeches, the settlers refuse to stop grabbing land, one side or other begins a war, the Indians are massacred. Some flee to areas the white man doesn't want yet, but this is a long book. They'll want them all eventually. It's the kind of book that's important and necessary but very, very depressing.

So I've turned to Susanna Clarke's The Ladies Of Grace Adieu instead, which is slight but enjoyable. Meanwhile my partner's reading Neil Gaiman's Fragile Things. Our bed is a playground of whimsy and fairies and old English folklore.
 
 
GogMickGog
09:58 / 07.11.07
Flicked through Gerald Kersh's Night and the City, just reprinted by London books. An odd one, really. A twice filmed London noir (but re-routed to New York via De niro in it's second incarnation) much touted by yer' Petits and Sinclairs. The whole thing is stocked with Soho dives, fast-talking crims and oodles of dodgy deals and rip-offs. yet as things progress, a note of melancholy creeps in much like an episode of Only Fools penned by Patrick Hamilton on a Whisky binge.

The protagonist (hero? villain? too blurred to tell) Harry Fabian is a relentless self-improver - constantly hiding behind facades: producer, promoter and ponce. Throughout the book he talks himself into corners and as the latticework of lies and mis-appropriations grows tighter, his mask begins to slip, hinting at a terrible conclusion. Except it doesn't arrive, not really. Things seem to move in circles; Fabian exploits someone, they exploit him back. Maybe Kersh is making a point but me, I like my noir with punch. Fabian's a rather neutred villain, like Pinky in Brighton Rock with his razor ground blunt. An oddly bloodless affair, but not without style and a flair for description.

Next up I've got some reprints from Serpent's Tail (Jean-Patrick Manchette and a Derek Raymond) as well as a whole swathe of matter from those folks at Savoy, all for projected articles and all as dark as a liquorice lightbulb. My brain's like a grubby abbatoir at the moment. Some Wodehouse next, I think, for a psychic Kim n' Aggie.
 
 
lord nuneaton savage
11:53 / 07.11.07
Wot Savoy you got?
 
 
Dusto
13:58 / 07.11.07
Let's see. Since last posting, I finished The Worm Ouroboros, by ER Eddison, an Inkling. It was an interesting high fantasy novel that predates The Lord of the Rings. The characters are a lot more full of passion than Tolkien's are. They're more human. It's a weird book, with a weird ending, but despite a few slow scenes, I think it's pretty great. At first I thought it was like George RR Martin, and to a degree it is, with sympathetic characters on both sides of a conflict between two kingdoms, but it's like George RR Martin mixed with Homeric epics and Norse sagas.

I also read The Coming of Conan the Cimmerian. My first exposure to Howard. Good, fun stories. Nice moments of humor. But I did find that he was a tendency to tell a bit too much. Paraphrased from memory, but an actual example of what I mean: "Conan stood facing the other man, both with swords drawn. Then the lights went out. When the lights came back on, the other man was lying there dead, his head severed from his neck. Conan had killed him in the dark." That last sentence just isn't necessary.

I read Elric of Melnibone. Fun stuff that I already mentioned in the Elric thread.

I read the first three Fafhrd and the Gray Mouser books in Dark Horse's new series of reprints. Probably the best stuff that I've read so far on this recent fantasy kick of mine. Leiber can be a great stylist sometimes, and the stories are always fun.

I'm almost done with Gormenghast. I read Titus Groan years ago and loved it. I'm really enjoying Gormenghast, as well, though it's not as tight as the first book. Not that the first book was very tight, but in this one I've noticed little inconsistencies about things like how old characters are and other minor details. Nothing major, but a bit distracting in an otherwise wonderful book.
 
 
GogMickGog
14:09 / 07.11.07
Uh, they were very obliging:

Reverbstorm 1-7 and Hardcore Horror 5 as well as D.M. Mitchell's A Serious Life, Jon Farmer's Sieg Heil, Iconographers and A Tea Dance at the Savoy.

Was actually going to contact you, Sav. , re: your thoughts and reactions to the canon - especially the stronger stuff. I'm still rather reeling from a first run through the Lord Horror volumes...in the sense I imagine they were intended for.
 
 
Nocturne
14:47 / 09.11.07
Our Lady: China Mieveille looks interesting. Will go on the Christmas wish list.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
16:00 / 09.11.07
Robert Harris' The Ghost... I'm only a couple of chapters in but it's proving as delightfully cutting as I'd hoped. The fact that this was written by a guy who used to be quite matey with Blair and then fell out with him over Iraq is pretty plain for all to see. And Harris is a good writer, and can plot well, so even without the bitter little digs (which would be entertaining enough on their own) I'm hoping for a decent thriller too. (Though I have been warned that it's far less enjoyable in the parts which are not blatantly obviously about Mr Tony).
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
14:17 / 13.11.07
Now I'm reading Night Watch by Sergei Lukyanenko which wins bonus points from me because the inside cover has a picture of the author with a smashing moustache smoking a pipe.
 
 
lord nuneaton savage
08:52 / 14.11.07
Mick, feel free to contact me as regards the Savoy cannon. I'm always up for gassing about them at length.
 
 
Janean Patience
10:04 / 14.11.07
I finished World War Z by Max Brooks last night, something I'm sure lots of people here have read. And it's alright. It could be better, it could have been lots worse. In a book told in voices it's a problem that everyone has the same voice, and the destruction of civilisation is skated over rather quickly. It reads like an imaginative sourcebook for a roleplaying game and even the author doesn't seem to realise which bits are good, worthy of further elaboration, and which are pedestrian. But I'd be interested to see what he does in the future.

The Broom Of The System is now my bedside reading. So far it's more whimsical than engaging, and though I find Wallace funny I'm used to there being more of a structure around it. I'll stick around for the cockatiel, though. There should be more cockatiels in literature. Mine would love to be in a book, I'm sure.
 
 
Axolotl
13:18 / 14.11.07
I recently read Martin Millar's "The Lonely Werewolf Girl", which was really good, and nicely barbelithian I thought. It's recognisably Millar although you can tell he's been influenced by Buffy, but in a good way.
I also read Richard Morgan's "Black Man" which I enjoyed, but didn't grip me the same way his Kovacs novels did. There's some good ideas, but I reckon it could have done with a wee bit of trimming here and there.
Inspired by watching the first season of "The Wire" I'm about to start reading "Homicide: A Year on the Killing Streets"
 
 
Dusto
14:16 / 14.11.07
I thought The Broom of the System was a promising first novel when I read it, though it did feel a little slight. There are some nice moments, and by the end I actually cared about Rick Vigorous, but it left me a bit dissatisfied. Even so, it's probably my favorite of his books so far. I recall reading an interesting interview with him wherein he said something like "I got a lot of praise for being a first novelist who didn't just write a thinly veiled autobiography, but really all I did was switch the genders." Not an exact quote by any means, but the impression that I got was that Lenore is supposed to be a stand in for Wallace himself.
 
 
Janean Patience
10:58 / 15.11.07
Having begun on DFW with Infinite Jest I suppose I was expecting a more solid foundation, comic passages built on a serious structure. And it hasn't given me anything as astounding as the "Where is the woman who said she'd come" section which comes early in IJ and convinces you that whatever else is going on in this book, DFW can write.

My fear is that it'll turn out like the wankfest novella at the back of Girl With Curious Hair, something so up itself and so clearly the product of a graduate creative writing programme there's precious little room for enjoyment. If it's someone's favourite I'm guessing it'll at least be more substantial than that. I liked the hissing cockatiel in the bit I read last night, anyway. Mine's a hissy bird. When people venture into her room after the lights have gone off, they often retreat scared and wondering what the fuck that was hissing so malevolently in the darkness.
 
 
Dusto
15:03 / 15.11.07
It's definitely not as impressive as Infinite Jest, but somehow it moved me more. It's definitely not as wanky as "Westward the Course of Empire Makes Its Way," which I think is the name of the novella you're talking about. I was hoping that it would somehow come together in an amazing conclusion, but that ending was utter crap. Broom is a little wanky, a bit too theoretical (he wears his "philosophy student" lapel pin a tad too prominently), and there's a profusion of underdeveloped characters and ideas, but there are also moments that made me forget all that. So in short, IJ is a much better book, but I just didn't care as much.
 
 
All Acting Regiment
16:34 / 15.11.07
Robert Southwell, quite the man. Ovid is surprisingly easy for someone like me with enthusiasm, but no formal learning, in Latin. He has a lovely round name, don't you think? Which seems to fit somehow with his affinity for nature. Deucalion cries. Wouldn't find Aeneas doing that, or at least I don't think so. Odysseus cries also, so I think Deucalion is in good company...

Also the 2008 Doctor Who annual is pretty special.
 
 
Blake Head
16:22 / 16.11.07
I didn’t quite know what to think of Manchette’s The Prone Gunman. It’s certainly focused, cleanly written, amusing in places, it’s a thriller that seems designed to be described as “stripped down”. I don’t think I really got a handle on whether the reader was meant to infer more about the main character’s inner life than was really there, whether the point was that he was largely inscrutable, or whether the whole book was intended as some sort of ironic jab at how mundane the lives of professional assassins / the conventions of the thriller are. Maybe I found it more interesting after just finishing it, but by now I’m struggling to place it as anything but a curiosity.

I don’t know who Joe Queenan is, but he appears to be someone who gets paid to write about all the things he hates, and good luck to him I suppose, though I can think of better candidates. Anyway, his America (A Descent into the Land of the Red Lobster… and Other Cultural Atrocities) is a fun, if mean-spirited read, as the author goes to look for the worst excesses of mass culture, gets a bit lost in the middling areas, and slowly comes to love his new tacky world. Never really massively sharp-witted enough to get away from the easy targets surrounding the premise, it’s ok, but not brilliant.

I went to the book launch for Ron Butlin’s No More Angels (he seems a nice chap) and – feeling that I probably don’t do it enough - on the strength of the reading bought his new collection of shorts, garishly inappropriate cover and all. The stories were a bit hit and miss, some were good, some a bit soft and inconsequential. A lot of them have a quality of some unspoken bleakness, some despair that has infected the characters but is never announced or explained; that was probably the most interesting thing about the book to be honest.

I’ve also been reading Sophie Hannah’s Selected Poems. They’re ok, at first, in a similar to Wendy Cope cosy sort of modern poetry way, easily scanned light verse, in simple rhyming schemes and run-on lines, until you begin to suspect that behind the occasional witty line and digestible verse, the observations about everyday life, relationships, sex, career, manners, motherhood, there’s nothing more interesting going on. The simplicity of the verse isn’t deceptive, it’s just simple, pedestrian, self-satisfied in its progress, banal. And once noticed, you start to pick up on the awkward rhymes, the lack of invention, just how unmemorable it all is. I’m sort of stuck between thinking occasional poems are cute enough in their way and being disappointed at how unambitious and unrewarding most of the poems are.

I also finished reading my soup-stained copy of Roadside Picnic. Thought it was great, paranoid and pessimistic, would love to see what the film does with it.
 
 
Blake Head
17:59 / 16.11.07
(Part 2: I’m on holiday, I’ve been saving them up)

Adrian Mole and the Weapons of Mass Destruction was an odd read. As amusing and unrealistic as ever, even so there’s a growing sense that horror and tragedy will overcome the comedy by the end of the book, and while it’s averted somewhat, couple that with a narrator hemmed in by personal debt, disillusion and inappropriate relationships, it’s an uncomfortable, strained read. Resonant too. Quite interesting, I suppose, that Townsend uses her self-deluded chronicler to look at current living and, bypassing easier targets, picks out the basic idea of stress, and of being out of place and out of one’s depth, as the basic makeup of how people are living now. I don’t know though, it’s obviously quite an effective technique bringing back Moley to see where we’re all at now, but it’s a bit like an old favourite you’ve had one too many times, there’s a strain on the narrative trying to keep all the old characters together and find out how they’re doing as well. Part of me, I confess, would have been happier if we’d left observing Mole a couple of books ago, when he finally seemed to growing up and out of his self-delusions, rather than watching him fall back into them. I know life’s not always like that but…

I’ve also been reading Jennifer Toth’s The Mole People, about the denizens, the people, who live or lived in the tunnels beneath New York City. Not much point in commenting about the writing style here, it’s serviceable enough, fairly detached an unemotional until the writer has to tell us how she fled New York under threat from one of her guides. Really it’s just a fascinating look at the lives of people who whether from choice or under the influence of drugs or alcohol or mental illness went to live wholly or partially in these tunnels. And the details of the mini-societies they formed there aren’t that surprising or engrossing, Toth’s quite clear that for all their talk of a rejection of aboveground society these groups are often comprised of those with the least number of choices in society – but the fact that one of those choices is to live in relative safety and comfort underground, sometimes several levels underground, is fantastic and fascinating, even at the same time as the stories of those individuals brought to make that choice can be quite moving. There’s been some discussion of the reliability of Toth’s account, as can be followed here and here, and the book’s about fifteen years old now, so buyer beware basically. Anyone who knows offhand more up to date info on the current situation feel free to let me know, if even half of it’s true it’s still a fascinating situation, and the book’s worth a read if you likes your urban legends, or, y’know, heavily into The Fantastic Four or something.

And then there’s the long-awaited Resplendent, the fourth part of Stephen Baxter’s Destiny’s Children series. And it’s great. I think Baxter’s a fantastic writer that manages to combine speculation about future scientific usage with a strong set of central themes. Resplendent is actually a series of linked short stories, each set in different periods of the other books in the series, and about the only criticism is that it’s quite easy to lose track of where the stories fall in the timeline/universe that he’s set up in previous novels and shorts. It did make me ponder the idea of digging them all out and reading them in one go, which can’t be a bad thing. These stories, the whole series in fact, can be read as filling in some of the detail of Baxter’s earlier Xeelee sequence from humanity’s perspective, and it’s to his credit that they don’t detract from the majestic imponderability of the greater story, we never really learn more about the Xeelee, just more about human society as Baxter imagines it moving. I think where Baxter excels, here and in other books, is in his writing when he draws on the basic belief in life’s ability to prevail, and adapt to its environment, and thrive, and matching that with an up close awareness of both the strengths of life, particularly human life’s malleability, and the horrors that can persist when ideas shape life towards a single purpose like war, and a detached appreciation of scale that surrounds the whole thing. I suppose read one way it’s quite a grim collection: individual lives subject to history and pessimism about the luxury of human values, mankind is enslaved, made free, and expands, breeding like vermin until it can confront an unbeatable enemy simply because it’s there and because expansion and conflict are the only things holding a galactic society together. But within that, again there’s that hope, that willingness to see the individual’s desires and actions within the greater scheme of history, and a celebration even of malformed societies and individuals because it’s a demonstration of life finding its way and constantly being subject to pressure to change. That’s what I got out of it anyway. That and the big spaceships.

About halfway through the Mortal Engines series, the enthusiastic invention of the first book has sort of given way to a quite grim sequence of events by the second, fleeing the mass obliteration of a city, our young heroes facing death, adultery, betrayal, kidnap, more betrayal, self-loathing, more death, blackmail. I’m sort of hoping my light reading gets a bit, well, lighter soon…

The Book Thief next.

Um, that’ll be Death and Nazi Germany then won’t it? Sigh.
 
 
GogMickGog
10:53 / 19.11.07
Mr./Mrs. Head (?), I certainly agree on the style. Stripped bare. No wandering adjectives or visual gloss. Wonderfully, no descent into stoci Lee Child formulaisms either ('he saw a man. The man was big.' etc). The flashes of violence were dealt with excellently: spare, forensic detail, the narrator resolutely impartial throughout. I was reminded of Cronenberg's A History of Violence : blast trajectories and open wounds rather undermine notions of heroism.

I took Prone Gunman to be impliccitly about the killer as commodity: part of an endlessly repeating cycle, consumed and discarded. The ending rather hammered this home, what with the killer assuming the role of his father. A quietly tragic end.

I'd also agree on your comments about the book as a deconstructed thriller. Initially I saw the protagonist as Lee Marvin in Point Blank, brutally determined, punching crotch willy-nilly. Yet, as the book continued, I was keenly aware of an inherent pathos creeping in; he doesn't get the girl, he doesn't finish off the villain and he's struck dumb by the trauma of it all.

For my money, Three to Kill is the better of the two translations in print. It also manages the collision between the two realities a lot better.

Just whipped through The Long Firm, after coming across a copy on an Oxfam bargain hunt. Arnott's a great yarn-spinner, much enjoyed it. I thought Harry Stark was a sufficiently mercurial figure to keep me gripped, but I can't see that there was any meaning beneath the veneer. It was, I suppose, a cultural history of a certain place and time, with an impliccit vein of gay history beneath that. Are the subsequent books worth picking up?

Now midway through Titus Alone, because I've never read it and, in spite of all the naysayers, it was only a quid.
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
12:20 / 03.12.07
So many books, so little time...

Just finished rereading Harry Potter & The Half-Blood Prince, I think this is probably my favourite of the bunch. It could be argued that the backstory that Harry finds out about Voldemort is largely irrelevent to anything, but at least it gives the illusion that the book is skipping along.

Now on
Towing Jehovah by James Morrow, in which God is bobbing dead in the Atlantic Ocean and a boat crew have to ferry His corpse up to the Arctic so it can be preserved in ice forever. This book was written near the start of the nineties before everyone heard about global warming.

Then it'll be In God We Doubt by John Humphrys, a book about agnosticism and searching for faith.
 
 
Janean Patience
20:31 / 12.12.07
Eventually finished The Broom of the System, after interludes to read The Black Dossier and Woody Allen's Mere Anarchy, and it was roughly what I expected. Which is to say good in parts, some great passages and characters, but with nothing that really made it a novel. All the narrative strands are tied to Lenore Beadsman, everyone's obsessed with her and trying to control her behaviour and thoughts and there's no real reason why. What's the big deal with Lenore? She's a cypher, which yeah is referred to in the family name but doesn't make for motivations. Wallace's entertaining flights of whimsy aren't anchored to anything and are therefore inconsequential, pointless. (And dialogue-wise, I got sick of "....". Followed by "...." and often by "...." again. As ellipsis goes, I prefer Martin Amis's "...what?" to indicate the beat of a pause.) So I'm kind of glad I read it, being a Wallace fan, but I'm glad I read Infinite Jest first because I wouldn't have read the latter after the former. Confused now. Is his book about infinity any good?

I've begun No Country For Old Men, but it's the kind of book that makes me tense and I close often. Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close is going better; the whimsy here has a serious base, and so far I'm impressed.
 
 
Dusto
23:26 / 12.12.07
Now midway through Titus Alone, because I've never read it and, in spite of all the naysayers, it was only a quid.

I read that recently. It was weird. Not as good as the other two, but still weird enough to hold my interest.

Re: Broom of the System. Yes, it had too many bits for their own sake. And it didn't really hold together. But maybe because it was the first Wallace I read, I still enjoyed it. Mostly on the basis of three things: Wang Dang Lang's fake story about his grandma that he uses to seduce Lenore which somehow angers me, the scene with Rick and Wang Dang standing beside each other peeing at urinals and the WD's torrent of piss as somehow signifying virility (this comes to mind fairly frequently when I use a urinal), and just my general pity for Rick in the end. Other than those things, the book left me with little. The Gilligan bar was dumb. The GOD was pointless, though it seemed like a good idea. The guy who wanted to consume everything was too much. But those three things were good.
 
 
Mono
10:50 / 13.12.07
Huh. I read Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close in an evening last week. It really gripped me, which I wasn't expecting at all. Mostly because I just couldn't get through Everything is Illuminated.
 
 
Hallo, Paper Spaceboy
03:02 / 18.12.07
After going back and finishing up the stories in St. Lucy's School for Girls Raised by Wolves (titular story being a special kind of awesome), I've just picked up Paul Di Filippo's The Emperor of Gondwanaland and Other Stories because I want to read some biopunk. I've never read him before, and had only heard his name thrown around offhandedly. Actually, the library system has him catalogued under three different spellings, so it took a bit of time to figure out what we had in the collection!

In the middle of reading the introduction, because I'm a voracious devourer of introductions and related fauna (grazing afterwords, antlered forewords, et cetera)--but I'm looking forward to the whole experience.
 
 
Dusto
11:26 / 18.12.07
I really liked Lost Pages, by Di Filippo, which is alternate reality stories set in ech decade of the 20th Century and focusing on a different author as the main character for each story. SO there's one with Franz Kafka as a costumed crime-fighter. Anne Frank starring in the Wizard of Oz. Joseph Campbell as the editor of Amazing Stories. Good stuff. His biopunk novel Ciphers, though, wasn't as good. Self-billed as a thematic sequel to Gravity's Rainbow, it apes Pynchon a bit too closely to ever be enjoyable.
 
 
Hallo, Paper Spaceboy
16:55 / 18.12.07
I'm going bookshopping this afternoon, so I'm going to look for Lost Pages, I think. Masked Kafka is an interesting idea...
 
 
Shrug
18:18 / 25.12.07
For my sins I've received Russel Brand's 'My Booky Wook'.
I've been feeling a little squeamish about it all, really.
I've read the first few lines and he's already talking about his dinkle. Oh for the love of vocabulary.
Good try, though, Mum. x
 
  

Page: 1 ... 56789(10)

 
  
Add Your Reply