BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Cinema as art or business

 
 
Benny the Ball
06:44 / 08.12.06
Following on from comments from David Lynch and indeed the Preacher TV show threads;

Should there be some allowence in cinema as an art form for projects that don't recuperate money, and are made purely as artistic pieces? And if so, should there be allowences for some directors to be giving a degree of freedom?

A lot is made of the Hollywood model that states that a big money spinning blockbuster will fund x amount of smaller films, and that the odd sleeper hit for a studio will make the real money. Does this model hold true?

Is there too much process from inception to projection for cinema to really be called art? Or does this betray a sense of snobbery?

Basically, does treating cinema as business hurt/unduely affect the final produce?
 
 
dmj2012
13:11 / 08.12.06
I think it's a double-edged sword. The idea of cinema as a product means that a lot of crap movies get made, as long as they can sell more than they cost to make. On the other hand, the amount of movies made in general because film is seen as a "product" means that more good films are made as well as bad. The percentage of good films is quite low as compared to bad, but the actual *number* of good films made is probably more than if film wasn't a viable commercial product.
 
 
PatrickMM
00:46 / 11.12.06
To some extent, it always feels like the director snuck one by when a good film comes out of the studio system. In terms of making 'quality films,' the studios always want at least a couple of high profile movies that will win Oscars, a ceremony that's largely a form of advertising. I think it's good that it brings attention to films that people otherwise wouldn't see, but they're still not pushing too far out there.

Still, at least it's not the Grammys where the only criterion for a nomination seems to be how popular a song was. I really take issue with the editorials that come out every year and claim that the Academy is out of touch with the mainstream because the films it nominated didn't make much money.

But, because it takes so much money to make, cinema will always be partially about business. Unfortunately, for most cinephiles, what's good and what makes money don't usually correspond. However, the few times when it does are enough to keep people financing challenging movies.
 
  
Add Your Reply