|
|
As interesting as this is, the study (as presented by the article) only concludes that toxoplasma infection came before a schizophrenia diagnosis in a small percentage of their patients, which is problematic for a number of reasons.
Even ignoring the troublesome nature of psychiatric diagnoses* (to my admittedly shaky and faded memory, anyone committed to a psychiatric institution in the US must be given a diagnosis before discharge, thus ruling out temporary personal crises in otherwise "healthy" individuals), most diagnosed with schizophrenia receive the badge later in life; late teens, early 20s at the earliest**. Toxoplasma's fairly common so there's plenty of wiggle room for infections prior to diagnosis simply being a matter of chance encounter.
Secondly, the study (article) treats schizophrenia both as a proven, solid neurological disorder and something we have the slightest clue about which certainly triggers some alarm bells. Research into schizophrenia is as messy as the subject itself, coming and going from any and all directions. The scope of schizophrenia research covers the whole spectrum: purely biological, purely environmental, purely societal, and mixes therein. As of now, there is no single and clear map as to what schizophrenia "is." So while it's interesting that some percentage of schizophrenic patients who participated in the study had previously been infected with toxoplasma, I'm going to have to go with more of a, "Huh. Fancy that." response until I better understand the study.
* Also see this essay on the difficulties in communication between a patient/doctor or schizophrenic/healthy relationship.
** Have been trying, and failing, to find a citation for this statement. It comes from a very faded memory of one or several popular psychiatric books I'd read some years ago. I'm hoping someone else with a fresher memory on the subject might be able to lend a hand. |
|
|