BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Question Regarding Government/Military and Acquisition of Private Technology

 
 
CameronStewart
20:16 / 30.11.06
I'm working on something at the moment and I'm having trouble turning up information about this. If a private individual or company invents some form of new technology that has strong military application (let's say, for the sake of an example, an invisiblity cloak), can the government make demands on the citizen to provide it for military use, or does the citizen have the right to refuse giving it to them?

Thanks in advance for any information you can provide...
 
 
enrieb
16:39 / 01.12.06
I also cannot find much information about this at the moment, partly because the new version of internet explorer is confounding my efforts to search and possibly because you could be asking the question from the wrong perspective. I remember hearing an interview with Noam Chomsky where he mentioned how the benefits from some military research projects were passed over to the private sector for private profit, the research and development having been paid for by the tax payer in the name of national defense.

I’m not to sure but I think the interview where I first heard this suggested was at Democracy Now. I have had a quick look around the net but could only come up with this link that relates to it.

Noam Chomsky: "Corporate Welfare in the U.S."

Chomsky argues that the Pentagon, along with NASA, parts of the Department of Energy, and several other government institutions, were developed and are maintained at least in part to support large transnational corporations. He points to the enormous profits that corporations have made from "dual use technology," technologies that are developed with public funds under the military and space exploration system, and then handed over to corporations to be patented and sold back to the public that financed their development in the first place.

Chomsky states that over fifty percent of all research and development conducted in the electronics, computer, aeronautics, metallurgy, laser and telecommunications industries has been done with the public's money. He points towards the satellites used by AT&T and the airplanes sold by Boeing as obvious examples of pieces of technology that were largely developed with taxpayers' money and are now used for private profit.
 
 
CameronStewart
18:54 / 01.12.06
Thanks for the info, I'll read the link in depth later.

As for the question of perspective - I'm in the process of putting together a story in which a character develops a particular technology, but keeps it solely for personal - though public - use. The question I'm struggling with is whether that would be feasible, whether the government would come a-knocking and whether my character could legally refuse to hand it over to them.
 
 
The Ghost of Tom Winter
04:00 / 02.12.06
Couldn't the government just take the product in question, since it is in public use, and just figure out a way to develop it themselves?
By means of reverse engineering perhaps?
Legally, i have no idea if they have the right to do this but I see it is possible.

Maybe check out Ford and his machines, how exactly he got involved with the military, whether donating his technology or if they actively sought his help.
 
 
stabbystabby
12:57 / 02.12.06
i have heard anecdotally that the US government has kept certain products off the market because they wanted them for their own use, but i dunno, you hear a lot of stuff...
 
 
Tamayyurt
16:44 / 04.12.06
I'm in the process of putting together a story in which a character develops a particular technology, but keeps it solely for personal - though public - use

When you mean public use do you mean that the public can go out and buy it or like Iron Man uses him personal tech in public, buy people can't go out and buy one of his suits?
 
 
CameronStewart
17:55 / 04.12.06
"Public" in the sense that it's not a secret, but it is NOT mass-produced for members of the public to use.
 
 
CameronStewart
17:57 / 04.12.06
Iron Man's a good example. Ignoring established Marvel history (I have no idea if Tony Stark has allied with the military or not), if Stark used his suit in public and the army came to him and wanted to buy it, could he refuse?
 
  
Add Your Reply