|
|
From The New York Times:
Neanderthals in Gene Pool, Study Suggests
By JOHN NOBLE WILFORD
Scientists have found new genetic evidence that they say may answer the longstanding question of whether modern humans and Neanderthals interbred when they co-existed thousands of years ago. The answer is: probably yes, though not often.
In research being published online this week by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the scientists reported that matings between Neanderthals and modern humans presumably accounted for the presence of a variant of the gene that regulates brain size.
Bruce T. Lahn of the University of Chicago, the report’s senior author, said the findings demonstrated that such interbreeding with relative species, those on the brink of extinction, contributed to the evolutionary success of modern humans.
Other researchers in evolutionary biology said the new study offered strong support for the long-disputed idea that archaic species like Neanderthals contributed to the modern human gene pool.
Two other reports of DNA studies of possible mixing of human and related genes are expected to be published in the next few weeks.
Both genetic and fossil studies show that anatomically modern humans emerged 200,000 years ago in Africa and migrated into Europe 40,000 years ago. In about 10,000 years, Europe’s longtime inhabitants, Neanderthals, became extinct. The mainstream interpretation is that modern humans somehow replaced them without interbreeding.
In previous research, Dr. Lahn and associates discovered that a gene for brain size called microcephalin underwent a significant change 37,000 years ago. Its modified variant, or allele, appeared to confer a fitness advantage on those who possessed it. It is now present in about 70 percent of the world’s population.
The new research focused on the two classes of alleles of the brain gene. One appeared to have emerged 1.1 million years ago in an archaic Homo lineage that led to Neanderthals and was separate from the immediate predecessors of modern humans. The 37,000-year date for the other variant immediately suggested a connection with Neanderthals.
Dr. Lahn said it did not necessarily show that interbreeding was widespread. It could have been a rare, perhaps even single, event.
---
HM! So what do you all think of this?
Personally I think it’s damn exciting.
Even if this were the case, have our genes mixed so much to completely obliterate all traces of what might have been Neanderthal?
I know Neanderthals get a bad rap about being the dumb cavemen, even though most archaeologically evidence suggests against it, how do you think we will respond to this new information?
If studies were to prove conclusive that Neanderthal DNA made its way into Homo sapiens, what do you think the impact would be of those who might possibly be part Neanderthal?
Coincidently we were covering Neanderthals in one of my anthropology classes and my professor showed us a comparison of a Neanderthal to a modern-day Frenchman and the similarities were kind of eerie. |
|
|