BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Rumsfeld resigns.

 
  

Page: (1)2

 
 
grant
16:54 / 08.11.06
Rummy's going to be replaced by Robert Gates, looks like.

Former CIA chief, first one to hold that office after entering the agency in an entry-level job. Career spook.

Was first nominated for the CIA director post in the 80s, but his ties to Iran-Contra made that nomination untenable. They tried again later, and it worked.

In 2005, he turned down an offer to act as national intelligence adviser (intelligence czar), which went to Iran-Contra strongman John Negroponte instead. Stayed on as president of Texas A&M instead.

Here are excerpts from a disturbing profile from the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists (I pulled it off Nexis) from 2004:

Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists

September 1, 2004

A not unreasonable failure?And another thing ...

BYLINE: Paine, Christopher

SECTION: No. 5, Vol. 60; Pg. 72; ISSN: 0096-3402

LENGTH: 1696 words



FROM DAY ONE, THE CONSERVATIVE OFFICIALS WHO WERE swept into power at the CIA by the "Reagan revolution" made clear their view that the Directorate of Intelligence's tradition of rigorously objective independent analysis was impeding a deeper understanding of the true nature of the Soviet threat to Western civilization. Determined to make intelligence more responsive to the political-military agenda of the administration, in 1982 Reagan's CIA Director, William Casey, abolished the directorate's existing organizational structure and promoted a relatively young and inexperienced executive assistant, Robert Gates, to fill out a new organizational chart. Gates soon seeded the analytical division with like-minded allies, who came to be known as "Gates Clones."...

There are direct links between this earlier era and the current Iraq intelligence debacle. When the first Bush administration nominated Robert Gates for the directorship in 1991, for the first time ever a number of veteran CIA analysts publicly opposed the appointment, tagging Gates as one of those most responsible for destroying the ethic of rigorous, impartial analysis. Others questioned Gates's nomination on the basis of the misleading testimony he had given on the Iran-contra scandal and his alleged involvement in a covert scheme to funnel support to Saddam Hussein's regime.... While Gates's tenure as director was brief, Tenet proved his bona fides to the Bush national security team, and his favor would be remembered when Bush the Younger carne to town nine years later and elected to keep Tenet on as CIA director. (Tenet reciprocated, and further politicized the agency, renaming the Langley headquarters the "George H. W. Bush Center for Intelligence.") The brief and unsuccessful tenures of Clinton's first two CIA directors, Jim Woolsey and John Deutch, assured that the managerial influence of the Gates Clones at CIA remained intact....

The forces mobilized by the CIA's anti-Soviet Islamic jihad of 1980-1992 had spiraled out of control, gone global, and morphed into a virulent anti-American, anti-Western crusade.

... The Select Committee traced many of the CIA's failings to a "broken corporate culture," which, it now appears, also includes lying to Congress. Tenet appears to have lied, not once, but twice to a congressional committee, telling Sen. Carl Levin on February 13, 2003 that the agency had briefed U.N. inspectors on all 105 "high value and moderate value" weapons sites in Iraq, a claim he reiterated in writing on March 6, 2003. In January 2004, after a year of resistance, the CIA finally declassified the number of sites that had been shared with the inspectors. In doing so, they quietly acknowledged that 21 of 105 sites had not been shared with the United Nations before the war.

 
 
Ticker
17:05 / 08.11.06
you know for a minute I was elated now however I maybe on the edge of terror.
 
 
grant
17:18 / 08.11.06
Really, what did you expect?

Not just a career spook, but an ideologue spook.
 
 
invisible_al
17:21 / 08.11.06
He's got to be confirmed by the House (or is it the Senate) when they come back from recess. So the Democrats might be starting to flex those muscles sooner rather than later.

I mean he only looks any good at all because he isn't Rumsfield, that fact alone doesn't qualify him to fix Iraq.
 
 
Quantum
17:35 / 08.11.06
On Iraq;
Bush retains primary control over national security and Democrats, who wrested control of the House of Representatives from Republicans and were on the verge of winning back the Senate, have been divided about the way forward. Robust debate is expected.

'Robust debate'? Should be interesting.

Both parties are looking to a bipartisan study group for answers.
Chaired by former Secretary of State James Baker, a Republican, and former Rep. Lee Hamilton, a Democrat, the group is expected to make recommendations before year's end.
Baker, a close friend of Bush's father, is credited with saving the son's presidency by overseeing the Florida ballot recount in the disputed 2000 election.


Great.
 
 
Hieronymus
17:37 / 08.11.06
He's got to be confirmed by the House (or is it the Senate) when they come back from recess. So the Democrats might be starting to flex those muscles sooner rather than later.

Bloody hell, that part alone is music that's been overdue.
 
 
grant
17:49 / 08.11.06
Senate confirmation, not House. Sixth in line from the presidency....
 
 
Ticker
18:01 / 08.11.06
Really, what did you expect?

I guess I was hoping for someone who didn't stink of old evils. I know that's crazy talk with this administration.
 
 
Chiropteran
18:06 / 08.11.06
If Gates ends up being placed in charge of operations in Iraq, it will not be his first time dealing with that country...

"Robert Gates served as assistant to the Director of the CIA in 1981 and as Deputy Director for Intelligence for 1982 to 1986. In that capacity he helped develop options in dealing with the Iran-Iraq war, which eventually involved into a secret intelligence liaison relationship with Saddam Hussein's Iraq. Gates was in charge of the directorate that prepared the intelligence information that was passed on to Iraq. He testified that he was also an active participant in the operation during 1986. The secret intelligence sharing operation with Iraq was not only a highly questionable and possibly illegal operation, but also may have jeopardized American lives and our national interests. The photo reconnaissance, highly sensitive electronic eavesdropping and narrative texts provided to Saddam, may not only have helped him in Iraq's war against Iran but also in the recent gulf war. Saddam Hussein may have discovered the value of underground land lines as opposed to radio communications after he was give our intelligence information. That made it more difficult for the allied coalition to get quick and accurate intelligence during the gulf war. Further, after the Persian Gulf war, our intelligence community was surprised at the extent of Iraq's nuclear program. One reason Saddam may have hidden his nuclear program so effectively from detection was because of his knowledge of our satellite photos."

-Gates Nomination (Senate - November 07, 1991; page: S16305 - Harkin Opposition to Nomination of Robert Gates to be Director of the Central Intelligence Agency) emphasis mine

Is that called "irony," or something worse?
 
 
Tsuga
18:12 / 08.11.06
"Others questioned Gates's nomination on the basis of the misleading testimony he had given on the Iran-contra scandal and his alleged involvement in a covert scheme to funnel support to Saddam Hussein's regime...."
See? He's got Iraq experience. Perfect for the job.
Seriously, it will be interesting to see what he does differently. It would be hard to be worse than Rumsfeld, but it always could get worse. Hopefully not.
 
 
Tsuga
18:15 / 08.11.06
whoops, cross-post there...
 
 
Spaniel
18:38 / 08.11.06
Is appointing him a good idea? For Bush, I mean.
 
 
Ticker
18:46 / 08.11.06
perhaps they're going for the experienced brutal sort of get the job done approach?
Though there are probably creepy reasons happening off stage that we can't even fathom with this lot.
 
 
grant
19:03 / 08.11.06
Bush's dad was CIA director before he became president, and Gates appears to be strong in neo-con faith.

So yes, it makes sense for Bush to appoint him.
 
 
Chiropteran
19:06 / 08.11.06
[I see I'm about to cross-post this with grant, but I'll go ahead anyway. see also above.]

Given Bush's tendency to surround himself with old friends (read: his insistence on personal loyalty), this probably has something to do with it:

The Kansas-born Gates is a Bush family hand from way back. He served Bush's father as deputy national security adviser and later as CIA director. He was a rare hardliner in the Bush 41 White House, famously suspicious of Mikhail Gorbachev and closer ideologically to then-Defense boss Dick Cheney than to Colin Powell and James Baker. TIME.com

The "previous Iraq experience" argument actually does make a certain amount of pragmatic sense, even if Gates' experience was gained under dubious circumstances this administration is unlikely to want to revisit. "Supporting the Iraqi security forces" is alleged to be the US role in Iraq right now, and Gates is probably intimately familiar (and possibly personally acquainted) with many of the groups and individuals still active in Iraqi military and intelligence, and is likely also in a good position to judge what kind of support will be most strategically useful to the Iraqi army.

Of course, his actual objectives under the Bush administration could be altogether different, and he could turn out to be a complete waking nightmare (also, I don't trust him any further than I could spit him, whole). There is also the possibility that his previous experience could work against him, if he has trouble adjusting his vision of Iraq to match the current situation (that proposed difficulty in changing focus was raised as an objection in the Harkin statement linked above, in that case registering doubt as to his ability to work effectively in a "post-Cold War world).
 
 
Spaniel
19:14 / 08.11.06
I'm kind of wondering whether the whole neo-con thing is something Bush should be distancing himself from.
 
 
grant
19:26 / 08.11.06
He should probably lose the accent, too....
 
 
Chiropteran
19:49 / 08.11.06
[mirthless laughter] Ho ho. [/mirthless laughter]

Bush said Wednesday Gates' time as deputy director of central intelligence in the Reagan administration, when "he helped lead America's efforts to drive Soviet forces from Afghanistan," prepared him well for the new role. CNN.com

Or, just possibly, inciting Soviet military "intervention" in Afghanistan, and then leading "America's efforts to drive Soviet forces from Afghanistan" (i.e. arming and training the Mujahideen, including, according to some accounts, Osama bin Laden, and actively encouraging the rise and export of Islamic fundamentalism*, not incidentally paving the way for the Taliban).

So, both of the major theaters of operations in the War On Terra, and this man played an integral role in creating both situations, and providing military support to the exact same people the US went to war to fight.

Wow. I'm almost impressed at the sheer gall of this nomination (potential effectiveness as SecDef notwithstanding).

*Zbigniew Brezinski, looking back on early US policy in Afghanistan (1998) "What was more important in the world view of history?... A few stirred-up Muslims or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the Cold War?"

"A few stirred-up Muslims" that, a couple decades later, the Bush administration (with many of the same decision-makers on-board) would describe the "greatest threat to civilization" and declare war on.
 
 
JOY NO WRY
05:41 / 09.11.06
Senate confirmation, not House

Doesn't look like that's going to a problem.
 
 
We're The Great Old Ones Now
08:33 / 09.11.06
From the New York Times profile, I don't see that this guy is big news. He reminds me of our own beloved John Scarlett. He isn't going to rock the boat for the Prez, he's 'loyal' by which in this context I think we mean 'accomodating'. He's pretty much the kind of chap you'd expect a President who's about to be facing a string of revolutions, revelations, and inquiries to want running the armed forces.

CNN transcript with Gates here for interest: I think it illustrated that the [Central Intelligence] agency has good sources and does have the ability to act when the information is clear. It -- the problem is, it's not comprehensive. They're not going to know everything all the time.

No, Robert, that would be the NSA's job...

I can't find any military reactions yet - how will the generals view this guy?
 
 
diz
09:12 / 09.11.06
Lepidopteran, thank you for bringing all that to our attention. I hope you don't mind, but I have posted something in my livejournal here, based on what you and others have posted in this thread. I did thank you, if that helps.
 
 
■
09:58 / 09.11.06
So, basically, the guy who kick-started Islamic fundamentalist terrorism is the guy appointed to stamp it out? Argh.
 
 
Quantum
10:43 / 09.11.06
You have to admire the elegance of it.
 
 
We're The Great Old Ones Now
13:50 / 09.11.06
You could say he has considerable experience with the issue of the Middle East, terrorism, and the like. He was also involved with the whole Iran-Contra thing, which gives him the triple benefit of some kind of crazy relationship with Iran and having been part of a major political bloodbath and having messed with Nicaragua to get rid of... Ortega, who was elected there the other day. Oh, and wasn't the US censured by the World Court over that? Yes, yes, I believe it was.
 
 
Chiropteran
16:15 / 09.11.06
Officially, his alleged involvement in Iran-Contra consisted of Not Knowing things he was in a position to know. The Grand Jury (iirc) decided that there weren't grounds to indict him. He was actually subpoenaed as a defense witness, but was never called. Unofficially, who knows, but it seems likely he didn't have direct involvement on the ground.

Again, from the above-linked Harkin statement:

"I should also mention, Mr. President, that aside from Mr. Gates' poor judgment in not pursuing the possibility of Government wrongdoing more aggressively, I still find it incredible that the Deputy Director of CIA was not aware of that major covert operation. How could such a high ranking official not know about the CIA's efforts to support the Contras? Did he purposely avoid trying to find out what was happening? The testimony seemed to indicate he did. Gates' selective lapses in recall about the affair by a man with a photographic memory raises serious doubts."
 
 
We're The Great Old Ones Now
18:23 / 09.11.06
Plus ça change...

It reall is remarkable how they keep recycling these chaps. Kissenger's in there, too. Oy.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
22:26 / 09.11.06
Ah, Kissinger. The git that keeps on giving.
 
 
We're The Great Old Ones Now
06:35 / 10.11.06
BoogieBOOOGIEBOOGIEboogieboogie!

Computers, fnord, terr'rists, cybercriminals=paedos=copyright violators=THE END OF CIVILISATION=ten year olds=(fnord)=all starts with downloading porn=parenting...

Well, all right, that's an exaggeration. But Mr. Gates is definitely concerned: "When a teenage hacker in the Philippines overnight can wreak $10 billion in damage to the U.S. economy by implanting a virus, imagine what a sophisticated, well-funded effort to attack the computer base of our economy could accomplish..." [Rhetorical elipsis mine]

Da da DAAAAAH!

It's Matthew Broderick all over again! Damn him! What? You say that was a movie?! HOLLYWOOD LIES! [that's enough paranoid drivel. Ed]
 
 
diz
07:57 / 10.11.06
My favorite quote from the article:

"We welcome rapid, even revolutionary change," he said. "For them, it is profoundly disturbing and even a desperate danger to their way of life."

That's why he works for the party which considers gay marriage a threat to civilization itself, because he's part of a civilization that welcomes rapid revolutionary change.

Not like those primitives.
 
 
grant
14:16 / 10.11.06
There's something interesting on Tom Tomorrow's blog -- there's supposedly a lefty A&M professor saying Gates has been privately very critical of BushCo in Iraq, and would thus be very motivated to take strong steps to change course.

This smells like a made-up whisper campaign to me, but you never know. TT is fact-checking now, waiting for response.
 
 
grant
16:46 / 14.11.06
German/U.S. group is suing Rumsfeld for war crimes.

The 220-page suit is being filed by US and German attorneys under a German law that allows the prosecution of war crimes regardless of where they were committed. It alleges that Rumsfeld personally ordered and condoned torture.

"One of the goals has been to say a torturer is someone who cannot be given a safe haven," said Michael Ratner, the president of New York's Center for Constitutional Rights, which is behind the litigation.
 
 
grant
16:58 / 14.11.06
Oh, and cancel the pro-Gates lead up there. Unfounded & denied.

For more on the Rumsfeld suit, read Time:

The plaintiffs in the case include 11 Iraqis who were prisoners at Abu Ghraib, as well as Mohammad al-Qahtani, a Saudi held at Guantanamo, whom the U.S. has identified as the so-called "20th hijacker" and a would-be participant in the 9/11 hijackings. As TIME first reported in June 2005, Qahtani underwent a "special interrogation plan," personally approved by Rumsfeld, which the U.S. says produced valuable intelligence....

Lawyers for the plaintiffs say that one of the witnesses who will testify on their behalf is former Brig. Gen. Janis Karpinski, the one-time commander of all U.S. military prisons in Iraq. Karpinski — who the lawyers say will be in Germany next week to publicly address her accusations in the case — has issued a written statement to accompany the legal filing, which says, in part: "It was clear the knowledge and responsibility [for what happened at Abu Ghraib] goes all the way to the top of the chain of command to the Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld ."
 
 
BrianFitzgerald
03:12 / 15.11.06
Michael Wolff's piece in this month's Vanity Fair, written before the elections and Rumsfeld's resignation, seems pretty fascinating and depressing to me. How the hell does Henry Kissinger do it? Why the hell does Kissinger do it?

Survivor: The White House Edition

This bit was spot-on:

Rummy, for instance—"enigmatic, obstructionist, devious, never know what his game is" Rummy (as Woodward has Scowcroft describe him)—is, let's face it, dead. He's gone at any moment. Indeed, as Woodward points out, he's managed to hold on only because intransigent Cheney intransigently supports him.

...which begs the question, then: What does Cheney's future look like?
 
 
Baz Auckland
04:31 / 15.11.06
You have to wonder when he's going to go away... (Kissinger I mean...)

From the Vanity Fair article:

Kissinger, the architect of the bloodiest and most catastrophic phase of the Vietnam War, emerged as well as he did (for sure, a war criminal to some, but to many, a man of renown) because most of the ill will got heaped on Nixon. Kissinger was the contrast gainer. Next to Nixon, he seemed … human.

So, yes, Cheney is the new Nixon.


...so will Cheney be the next victim? Should there be a White House dead pool?
 
 
Jake, Colossus of Clout
04:43 / 15.11.06
I wouldn't get my hopes up. Methinks Bush would be driven out in disgrace before Robot Eyes Cheney.
 
  

Page: (1)2

 
  
Add Your Reply