BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Self-Distribution, Song Ownership & the disc-less album

 
 
grant
14:33 / 24.10.06
I just found these two related stories on reddit today:

1. Cracker goes head-to-head with Virgin Records. Timeline: Cracker leaves Virgin. Virgin, who owns the masters to Cracker's old hits, releases a "Greatest Hits" album. Cracker, fed up with that, rerecords all the old songs plus a couple more (including one aimed right at Virgin called "It Ain't Gonna Suck Itself") and releases its OWN Greatest Hits record. And fans spam the Amazon page for the Virgin version directing people to the better, bigger, self-made album.

And check out how well it's working.

2. More interestingly (although I really like Cracker better as a band), Barenaked Ladies are offering their new album for download. In mp3s and lossless FLAC files. With *no DRM software* (unlike the same tracks you'd get via the iTunes store).

From that link:
An album is sold for $9.99 for mp3 and $12.99 for FLAC lossless files. Essentially you are paying $12.99 for a CD, which is a better deal in my opinion than iTunes (due to lossless files).

More importantly, BNL has been very successful, topping $970,000 in gross sales from “intellectual property” during the first week following the release of “Barenaked Ladies Are Me,” according to thedigitalmusicweblog. One thing to keep in mind is that the band makes more money than selling albums through more traditional channels, with artist run labels making almost $5 per album.


The record companies have to be terrified over this. Or else, you know, they've completely lost touch.
 
 
Saveloy
15:03 / 24.10.06
I'm guessing that both groups are able to make this much cash in this way because they have established fanbases, which they built up by being on record labels (who provided marketing, distribution etc). Are new artists going to be able to do the same thing without the help of a label?
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
15:30 / 24.10.06
The last Ministry album was on eMusic as an official download (which worked out at about three quid) a month before the CD release- it'd be interesting to find out how much business it did compared to the hard copy.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
15:31 / 24.10.06
(A quick search has found out that this gets more complicated- pre-orders for the hard copy CD of the album also received 50 free eMusic downloads).
 
 
MattShepherd: I WEDDED KALI!
08:35 / 25.10.06
TMBG have been doing this for at least three years -- I bought The Spine from their download service in 2003, IIRC, before it came out in stores. They've been doing both streams, though, not eschewing physical media altogether.

But -- and this is a big but -- these are all established acts with very loyal fanbases branching out. Finding new artists that have done okay without a record company is far more difficult... I can think of Ani DiFranco (in the pre-Internet days, even!) as a trailblazer, and now... I dunno. MC Frontalot?
 
 
Hydra vs Leviathan
10:43 / 25.10.06
This sort of thing has been happening in the totally or near-totally DIY musical scenes (anarcho-punk, crust-punk, some bits of the UK dub scene, some bits of the drum'n'bass scene, probably some techno, etc) for as long as the technology has been available (altho in the more "politically-DIY" scenes the tracks have often been distributed for free (and/or as little-more-than-cost-price CDRs at shows), and in the less politicised [in that sense] scenes such as grime, DnB etc some artists who started out pressing up their own vinyl, distributing free mp3s thru their blogs, etc have now got record deals on the back of that)...

It's perfectly possible for a band, group of bands or group of solo artists (or any combination thereof) to run their own record label as a workers' co-op, and IIRC some Jamaican reggae record labels in the 70s were constituted in this way (will try and dig up data on that, i think i read it at somewhere like uncarved.org) (of course plenty of others were run by total rip-off merchants - and most, whatever their ethics with regard to paying artists, were little more than producers or recording studios who rented vinyl presses in terms of organisation - one producer would often have several "labels" at the same time) - probably true of many other relatively-self-contained scenes as well...

"Major" (in the sense of "mainstream", internationally famous) artists doing this sort of thing is interesting, particularly in so much as it puts out the message that anyone with basic web access can do this, but IMO it's nothing new in terms of the phenomenon itself, just in terms of its appearance in the mainstream...
 
 
grant
19:10 / 25.10.06
I'm interested in what it could *do* to the mainstream, though.

Obviously, labels are really good as promotion machines, but it seems like they're becoming more superfluous for anything else to do with music. Band managers might be better off finding a decent promoter (or, I dunno, "promotion syndicate") than trying to sign a band onto a label.

And labels might not be making so much in the way of profits if this self-releasing keeps up.
 
 
MattShepherd: I WEDDED KALI!
19:40 / 25.10.06
Conversely, with the Internet/file-sharing/mySpace/alternate promotions all digging into record companies' former areas of expertise, the labels are running out of things to offer artists.

It'd be nice to see a swing in the dynamic where good artists are courted by labels, as opposed to everyone looking at "getting signed" as the be-all and end-all of a music career.

The only thing record labels will do in the next ten years is save major-market radio station programmers from having to think. Their benefits to the artists themselves are getting chipped away at an alarming rate.
 
  
Add Your Reply