|
|
I'm curious about heart rate monitors. There seems to be an ample body of evidence that using them can really help you with training, but they're expensive enough that I don't want to just plunge in. And while the pause-two-fingers-on-the-throat option is a no-cost alternative, I don't like breaking from something like rowing and losing all that sweet momentum.
I do enough different exercises (rowing, running, cycling, boxing) that I'd like to be able to compare/contrast exercise levels for each and heart rate, too.
What makes me (a bit) nervous is that there are so many HR monitors out there, at so many price ranges, that I'm not sure what is paying for useless "features" and what is paying for quality. Ideally, I'd like something that tells me what my current heart rate is. Point finale. Maybe the percentage of a programmed maximum HR, if I'm feeling fancy. I don't mind paying for a longer-lasting, better-designed monitor, but I don't want to pay for "features" I'm not going to use.
Do any of you sporting types use these? Is there a brand or model you're recommend?*
For bonus points, is there any great merit to all the geegaws that I dismiss out of hand, like calorie counters and training plans and Internet uplinks and ... stuff... that I should maybe consider more seriously as a training aid?
*My immediate lean is towards Polar, because Polar HRMs can synch up with a special receiver for my rowing machine. But I can be convinced otherwise. |
|
|