BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Fey, thoughts anyone?

 
 
Haloquin
20:14 / 25.09.06
So, I'm not altogether sure how to start this, but I'm trying to find out how people see "the Fey" (to differentiate between the beings and the land I'm sticking to the term "Fey" for beings, as "Faery", in its multitude of spellings, can mean the land).

What are people's thoughts on these? Thoughtforms? Nature spirits? Non-human ghosts? A type of Angel? In that case, I guess the next question is "what's an angel?" so probably best not to go there.

I've found so many people with different approaches to what they consider Fey to be. Some immediately and emphatically insist they are dangerous... others seem to consider them to be pure beings of light here to help us. Some people treat them as simply spirits of place and plants, others treat them as beings independant of physical space.

I tend towards thinking of them as real, independant from me beings... but reckon that as I (and in my opinion, everyone does this) see everything through a variety of personal filters, it would be extremely wierd if I could see (hear, feel, etc.) them objectively. So I interact with them as beings made of something other than me, some of which are friendly, and some of which are viscious, some who aren't interested in me, and some who have a very squewed perception of what it means to have a human body (or mind for that matter). For the most part, they seem to be as individual as the rest of the creatures on this planet.

I guess my question is... what do you think of them? What do you think they are? And how, if at all, do you work with them?
 
 
Unconditional Love
23:05 / 25.09.06
Your description of them reminds me of the djinn and some peoples accounts of interacting with angels.

Perhaps you are very correct in your idea of the filter looking at the source, but also is it possible for Fey to interact with jinn, do supernatural beings have multicultural interactions, though exchange for example as human beings do? Some of ember leos posts suggest such interactions are taking place during possession. So i wonder if viewing fey through a multicultural filter would reveal the cross communication and cooperation of the various fey like beings associated with a variety of differing cultures, perhaps.

If i remember correctly it was during the post dee years and into the victorian that the fey started to be considered as natural angels and integrated into invocations that referenced christian symbolism, that may well be the origin of them being considered angels, thou i couldnt vouch for that explicity.
 
 
Saturn's nod
10:13 / 26.09.06
I have lots of ways of thinking about them, but one of my current favourites is heavily informed by David Abram's book Spell of the sensuous. (One chapter online here) To summarise: "What if the ants themselves were the "household spirits" to whom the offerings were being made?"

I wonder if perhaps there has always been such a high rate of imperfect vision amongst humans, and of course corrected vision is a pretty recent developed world phenomenon. I add to that thought, the great propensity for human brains to see human shapes with the assistance of our powerful creative imaginations. Then, when I see insects, hedgehogs, birds, rabbits, and so on, I wonder whether they have previously been observed through a haze of short sight, plus a dose of cultural conditioning toward anthropomorphic fairy forms. After all, insects really are the small flying creatures who sex amongst the flowers. Hedgehogs grunting and slobbering in a hedge somewhere lonely at night can sound a lot like a goblin might (or a axe-wielding serial killer, depending on the shape of one's imagination) And I find it easy to perceive Salmonella enterica serovar typhi or Vibrio cholera blooms as angry water spirits, on the less-directly-perceptible end of that kind of thinking.

So I am inclined towards a view of the fair folk as the nonhuman inhabitants of the locality, though I aim not to be locked into that view. That view seems useful to me, for getting embedded in the reality of our ecological situation, which is kindof pressing iof we are to manifest a sustainable human future.
 
 
Haloquin
12:57 / 26.09.06
That piece is beautiful, Thank you Saturn.

It does seem to express the idea that the nature spirits are physical parts of the world that appear supernatural when we look at them and how the shamen interact with them, but I'm not sure that precludes there being a energetic part that we can sense, in whatever form.

I find it interesting that, being in an urban enviroment currently, many of the Fey I come across don't appear to be connected to natural areas. Although it is easier to find Fey in parks, they do seem to like concerts. The anthropomorphicisation of natural phenomena being what we interpret as Fey Spirits makes sense... that they would be non-human and we "see" them as best our brains can cope with.
I wonder if the sense of Fey wandering lost, or disconnected, within places devoid of nature is a sense we have of our disconnection from the natural world (as a species) either projected as an image, or projected onto energy already there, or if they are spirits (in the non-physical entity sense of the word) that have been ousted from their place or have had their homes destroyed.
I also wonder if we've come to see the natural forces as human-like beings because we are less connected to the world around us, so we stick to what we know best (humanoid forms) or if those shamans see them in a similar way but know what they are...

When we come across them floating around detatched from their natural counterparts, could they be mediators between us and the rest of the non-human world?


Slackula... I have come across people who have had experiences with the Fey communicating with deities, and angels apparently, and vice versa... but I don't have any real experience with this.
I think Djinn etc. are how other cultures see what I'd call Fey. So it would seem weird for me to see a Djinn talking to a Sidhe as I assume I'd interpret what I sensed from the Djinn in terms of a Fire Fey of some description, whereas I'm used to the idea of Sidhe, so I'd keep that perception as Sidhe (for example, I'm not too clued up on Djinn mythology, I think they're normally considered fire based?)
 
 
Princess
15:29 / 26.09.06
I like the fey, but I think they're scary. I think all the ideas you mentioned Haloquin could easily be classed as fey. I tend to think of Fey as quite an amorphous race, and that the boundaries of what is\isn't fey seems to switch depending on which one your talking too. It's that slight alienness to them that makes them frightening to me, the fact that they just aren't human and I couldn't quite say what they are.
I'm pretty uncomfortable witht the fey=angels line of thought. A lot of this is because I'm still resolving some weird neurotic stuff I have with my Christian upbringing, and partly it's because the fey just don't seem all that nice a lot of the time. The myth I always was told is that the Fey\Sidhe\whatever where the angels that didn't side with God or the Devil during the war, and so where thrown out into the earth. While that fits with my idea of the fey as liminal creatures, I find the sin\damnation worldview that it ties into a little damaging to my temperament. If I think about it for too long I sink into a huge self-hating mood and find myself self-harming and being apathetic because I become so sure of my own sin. As I said, issues.
Other christian interpretations have that the Sidhe are the children that Eve tried to hide from God (she hadn't washed them yet) and so he made them invisible forever. This is slightly less scare inducing, but doesn't resonate for me.
I've also heard souls of the pagan dead, souls of unbaptised children, and children of the the goddess Danu. I tend to think that theyre all true depending on the fey in question and their frame of reference at the time.
On the urban fey, yeah, I;ve seen them. Occasionally I've met angry fey, around the borders of towns, where there is a sense of humans invading there area. But in any moderate town I'm as like to find a faery who is very much a part of the environment. Trash-can fairies in the park and PVC fey walking round the red light district etc.

As to the Djinn\Fey connection:
Well, according to this site, (also quite a discussion of various faery mythologies IMNSHO), Faeries have an etymological link to the Peri (a type of Djinn I think). I know that there are definite crossovers in the folklore. I've read (don't have the references as all my books aren't at uni with me, it was something like "Celtic Folk Tales" or "Celtic Mythology" or "Celtic! Celtic! Celtic!, Buy me you credulous tourist!" or something) sotries that are basically exactly the same but with the word Fey replaced with Djinn.

The one I remember is of a changeling child. Parents, worried that there kid was a fake, had to boil stew up in an empty shell. The fey\Djinn, upon seeing it, would laugh out loud at how ridiculous that was and then reveal itself by eulogising at length (usually in rhyme) about how crazy the people where. Upon revealing itself it either flew away and then returned the child, or was tortured by the humans until it gave them the where-abouts. The book said that the egg-shell\changeling motif had been quite a common one for both Islamic and Celtic views of the fey.
 
 
EmberLeo
18:52 / 26.09.06
You know, I haven't tried very hard to categorize the Fey. They are themselves. Some are scary, some are reasonably nice. Like any other category of being, they're people. Not human, certainly, but as varied in their inclinations to harm as the animal kingdom must be, eh? So there are Fey I would avoid, and there are Fey I would politely engage in conversation, and I have one Fey I consider a personal Ally, and another I consider a dear friend.

It seems pretty clear from what Northern European stories I know that the various beings I call Fey have their own world - Faerie, Ljosalfheim, whatever - so I can't quite accept that they are only the local spirits of the land and it's inhabitents here in the physical world. Today I will postulate that the Fey are Otherworldly paralells to nature spirits here. I think there is some difference between Fey and Landwights, but only in the same way there seems to be a difference between humans in our physical world, and human spirits as they manifest in Otherspace.

But I don't really know, because I haven't really tried to categorize them in that sense.

--Ember--
 
 
Haloquin
15:44 / 28.09.06
I've found it quite hard to come to any real explanation or catagorisation of Fey, but sometimes I've needed a way of explaining to people what I mean when I talk about them, so I try and find some kind of box to put them in.
I resonate happily with the lack of clear categorisation expressed in both your replies, Princess and Ember, although, Princess, your feeling on the Fey and Angels not being the same because the Fey aren't always all that nice rang a couple of warnning bells for me... although I recognise that some Fey are blinkin scary, and very few don't have that "alien" quality, I don't find the Angels to be always all that nice/friendly either, in energetical workings or in mythologies... but I agree with the lack of resonance between angels and Fey generally, although sometimes there seems to be a connection. I'm coming to the conclusion that, as has been expressed, the Fey tend towards a lack of easy, hard and fast definitions, which is kinda nice, and its not just that I haven't quite worked out what they are.
 
 
Princess
19:17 / 28.09.06
Yeah. I think I may have phrased that a bit awkwardly (ie wrong). Your right about angels not being entirely nice, I can't work with them for that reason. But with the Angels the agenda is pretty clear (IMNSHO), in that it's for God, all the time. But with Fey I kinda feel that you can't tell. They are, by their nature, Other.
So if we are all agreeing they are a bit nebulous, maybe we should start to talk about how the fey influence our practice, how we interact with them, what place they have in our own personl mythology.
I'd start with my own talky talk but I'm a)tipsy and b)late so someone else may have to start the ball rolling.
 
 
EmberLeo
09:15 / 29.09.06
At the risk of sounding like a total gamer, I would over-simplify the difference between Angels and Fey in terms of how they get nasty as Lawful Neutral vs. Chaotic Anything. Angels, when they are incredibily dangerous, are following fairly specific rules that ostensibly apply in this reality. It's not that they ever tend towards evil (unless you're talking about the fallen), it's just that the rules and orders they're following may not amount to anything nice on our behalf.

Fey, on the other hand, when they are following rules are following either the basic rules of Nature, which amount to anarchy at a glance, or a complex social rule set all their own that have little to nothing to do with our reality - and that's the "nice" ones. The less-kindly Fey are potentially outright chaotic AND malevolent, neither of which can be attributed to my understanding of what Angels represent.

However, "safe" isn't in ANY of these descriptions, no matter how you look at it.

--Ember--
 
 
illmatic
11:27 / 29.09.06
Personally, though I find this discussion interesting, I've found this thread a bit hard to read. I was pondering why this is, and I think it's the lack of experiential description that's key for me.

So - could people perhaps recount experiences they've had with what they believe to be Fey, as clearly and precisely as possible? What exactly did you see/hear/feel? Was it internal or external or a combination of the two? How exactly are you represent this experience to yourself? How critical have you been about the whole experience?

I think examining our experiences in this light is could be potentially quite productive. I find the taking of qualities and categories of being for granted as well, a bit odd really, and feel that these categories may be a shorthand for talking about a more complex phenomena. It's the latter I'm more interested in (see Saturn's Nods post above).

Ember's sentence here for instance: Angels, when they are incredibily dangerous, are following fairly specific rules that ostensibly apply in this reality.

Now, E, I'm not getting at you personally, but I don't believe in angels. What I'm interested in is what exactly have you experienced that's made you construct this belief?
 
 
Unconditional Love
12:42 / 29.09.06
Has anyone considered that the christian batch of spirits, angels, etc possess there hosts, ie the congregation, as the christians themselves begin to typify certain biblical values, ie people become there HGA, Its an idea that i clicked into while doing kung fu in a church, and looking at the people that surrounded me. It can also work as a way to relate to principle value structures, but never confuse the whole person for your perception.

That possession isnt a phenomena thats limited to certain cultures but prevalent in all spiritual structures, that not only demons possess in christian cultures but angels as well. The djinn are also known for this phenomena, i wonder does this apply to the fey folk? Are their stories of them possessing people.

Or perhaps are peoples higher selves coloured by the interactions they partake of by there spiritual systems to the point where they have lived those spirits enough, they become those spirits, or attract external spiritual entities to merge with there being.

Ideas mainly with some focus on self involvement with a variety of spiritual systems and some a perception of others relationships to there spirituality.
 
 
Haloquin
15:44 / 29.09.06
What I'm interested in is what exactly have you experienced that's made you construct this belief?
So - could people perhaps recount experiences they've had with what they believe to be Fey, as clearly and precisely as possible?


Thanks for the challenge Pegs.

Ok... I think there are two main types of experience I've had with Fey, one where I've experienced them while going to "another realm" (I think this is best clarified as a different frequency of normal consciousness that I interpret as being a different place. The reason I think of it as somewhere other than the normal world I live in is because it has a different quality in the way I sense it, a different edge to it, and there are more than one
different type, so I figure there's more than one other place). The other type is when I'm wandering normally and I get a tugging at my mind and sense them here, for lack of a better way of explaining. This normally is when I'm in a slightly different state of mind to usual anyway.

Examples... When I have used trancework to go through a freeform visualisation/journeying/etc, two different patterns can apply, going somewhere planned or going wherever I feel like. When I've planned to visit Fey places, the places I end up have a certain frequency of feeling. (I'm not altogether sure I know how to explain better, feel free to poke for more details, if I can I will) There always seems to be a certain quality of colour, of energy
that is stronger in these places. I have used RJ Stewart's imagery and visualisations for visiting places and one that I am thinking of now involved going down an upside down tree and coming out in a field. The imagery he draws on tends to be from faery/folk tales so its quite strongly associated with the idea of Faeries I guess, which is why I think its a good starting point for working out what fey (as a feeling) would be. Anyway, like
I said, this place had a particular feeling to it, which I've only felt in visualisations where I've been trying to visit somewhere fey. So now I use that feeling as a way of deciding that a place is fey. And when I've come across beings I haven't expected in other visualisations or tranceworkings, if they have a similar feeling to the fey places, I consider them to be fey themselves, and normally this seems to be confirmed by them, although that could be because
that is just how I've decided to see them etc. etc. I have been told when I've been mistaken, when I've assumed something fits X category and they've disagreed.

What exactly did you see/hear/feel?

In cases where I've not been visualising things deliberately and have walked in a place open to things, I normally come across weird feelings, moments/places that feel not quite right. And then I sortof feel closer at what it is, unless I get a go away feeling,then I normally leave it be. Thinking of it, these places have almost always felt fey. Its been rare for them to feel other than, although I have come across, in this way, those that I tend to
reckon are deities, again, its been a slow association of a type of feeling with what other people have identified as deities, or with the energies that have shown up when I've been looking for deities.

When I was younger whenever we went to the park I'd dissappear looking for Fairies, and whenever I thought I found them I remember a similar feeling to what I assosciate with the fey now.

To differentiate just daydreaming or fantasising from conscious visualisation/journeying... vis/journeys feel different. They come with a specific charge of energy, daydreaming is just like thinking, visualisation is like thinking with emotion, energy, and with things happening that I don't expect.

Was it internal or external or a combination of the two?

My general way of deciding what things are is going on what I "know" it to be instinctively, which I am aware is possibly unreliable... I'm also aware that once I have an impression of what something is, its quite likely that I'll let whatever "evidence" I come across just back this first impression up. So I try to be careful. So generally I tend towards starting with an internal sensing, to understand, although this internal wondering may be triggered
by an external sensation. For example, going into somewhere where there is a high level of energy normally makes my skin buzz, and I respond emotionally, either with a sense of joy, or of having to leave asap.
Then I "see" what my brain instinctively tells me is happening.

So, walking in Lawns wood around 9 or 10pm one autumn, I sat under a tree. I wasn't particularly happy at the time (personal reasons) and I relaxed against the tree, which I could feel as a type of energy around me. I tend to find trees comforting, which is why I gravitate towards them when feeling down. And I felt almost a twinge off to one side, a tingle of a different type of energy. So I looked towards that direction. And I got an impression of a humanoid
creature that had skin like a tree and a long nose. And he felt fey, like the places and the beings I'd met when aiming for fey places, there is a definate feeling of other involved. And I got the impression of communication, which I translated into words. But the experience wasn't of words, more of a knowing, an understanding of what he was telling me. Strangely enough he dissappeared when the church bells rang the hour. I wondered about why that would be, and decided
that as it had shocked me into being physically present, and had broken my concentration chances are it just brought me out of a receptive frame of mind.

How critical have you been about the whole experience?

I try and think about the experiences I've had, and I tend to fall back on the argument (which I seem to remember already mentioning) that everything I experience is through my senses, and is interpreted through my mind/brain (whichever, am not going into that discussion yet) and that as we consciously only register a small portion of what our senses pick up, it is possible to pick up on things we normally ignore, and my brain/mind is wired in such a way that I interpret certain things as Fey. Because all of the world we experience is dependent on how our brain/mind is wired up, then it makes sense, to me, for me to say that I see Fey, where someone else just feels uncomfortable, and someone else feels nothing.

How exactly are you represent this experience to yourself?

I actually fluctuate on how seriously I think of these experiences. I do sometimes wonder if I'm making it up entirely. Mostly I decide that this is how I'm currently classifying these particular experiences, and that there definately seems to be something going on.
 
 
EmberLeo
17:33 / 29.09.06
Pegs: So - could people perhaps recount experiences they've had with what they believe to be Fey, as clearly and precisely as possible? What exactly did you see/hear/feel? Was it internal or external or a combination of the two? How exactly are you represent this experience to yourself? How critical have you been about the whole experience?

The way you phrase this makes me brace myself for dissection. I don't generally mind expressing what I've experienced, or anything, but there's something about being asked to explain in excruciating detail and then measure how critical I was that sets me on edge - like you're not trying to gather information about people's experiences, you're merely waiting to bust our myths.

I kind of assume you didn't actually mean it that way?

What I'm interested in is what exactly have you experienced that's made you construct this belief?

The bit about Angels being what they are? I suppose that's more of an intellectual assessment correlating what I've read, and what people whose oppinions I trust have told me about their experiences working with archangels and such. It's not an area of primary focus for me, but I have a pretty clear working defintion.

As for why I believe in them, or at least don't disbelieve?

Well, first of all, and this may sound dumb to you, but to me it means a lot: My name means "Angel", so I've always paid a bit of attention to what They are supposed to be.

Second of all, I grew up a pantheist who believed in ghosts from personal experience, and angels by default. My parents taught me energy work and thought forms, and a few other highly useful general principals, but didn't teach me much of anything about other types of beings beyond that I should always be respectful unless given a reason not to be.

I wanted to believe in the Fey, and I thought the gods sounded slightly more significant than the main character in a really good book, but it wasn't real to me, and there was nothing I could do to really force myself to believe, so I didn't try.

Then, without ever intending to, I started meeting them, and my whole world changed. So I am no longer willing to assume that something as major to so many people as angels simply don't exist.

But I accept the definitions given - that they are the direct servants of a henotheistic/monotheistic god, and that their job is to carry messages, and otherwise do His direct bidding. That description, plus others from ceremonialists I have known, leads me to the conclusion that angels are the sort to follow the rules they are bound by concientiously, and with good-to-neutral intentions.

I suppose as a working definition, I start with the guideline that if they don't fit that fairly basic description, they may not be angels. I'm not going to use this definition to challenge someone else's direct experiences with angels, but it's a guideline for me, should the subject arise.

Slackula: i wonder does this apply to the fey folk? Are their stories of them possessing people.

Well, I don't know if there are stories about it, but I've seen it a few times. There seems to be a lot more of the idea that the Medium is a Window, and a lot less assumed exchange of control. I've never seen one of the fey demand or expect to have full control over the medium's faculties the way a god or other spirit might.

That is how I originally met the Fey. I was spending time with people I know and respect, and noticed that one of them was acting differently than usual, and that her energy felt strange to me. At first I started to think I had done something to offend her, such that she seemed colder than usual, and sharper around the edges. As the evening wore on, I continued to try and figure out what the frell was going on with her, and she seemed more and more amused.

When we were in a private place, and could discuss it more directly, they told me what was going on - that a particular lady Fey they knew was acting through my friend. Their description accounted for both the change in energy and the odd behavior, but I did as I usually do when I'm handed a totally new situation - I accepted the working definition for the time being, until I had the time and space to examine the experience on my own. So I talked with Her for a while longer (as I have several times since then) and then She went on Her way, and I ask my friend a few questions.

The whole thing seemed bizzare to me at the time, but I considered, amongst other things, the experience of the people I was talking to, and my estimation of their honesty, and concluded that they certainly weren't playing a trick on me, or lying to me, and that their description of what they believed made as much sense to me as any other theory, and far more sense to me than anything I could apply from practice.

And I realized at that point that I had already somehow gotten past the hurdle of believing the Fey exist. Something had clicked for me, I'm guessing on an energy level, and the question shifted from "Do they Fey exist?" to "Were the Fey visiting just then?".

A few years later, with little other direct experience with the Fey under my belt, I decided to take some RJ Stewart workshops (wonderful man, beautiful voice, expensive seminars). The first one went okay, I suppose. It was more about techniques than of meeting the fey directly, really. It was basically a way of doing journey meditation, and a way of journeying with the body by walking a certain way (not physically, I mean with a certain energy and intent while you walk). The second seminar was about Healing, and involved a great deal more journeys to meet with the Fey. And certainly there were many kinds of Fey there to meet, from little skittering ones, to relatively plain ancestorly folks, to animals and anthropomorphics (I met one who looked rather a lot like a tall, thin man I was very attracted to, but with antlers), to brightly shining ones. In that sense, I think RJ Stewart and Brian Froud seem to see things similarly.

I was supposed to pick up an animal ally and a fey ally at that seminar, but I didn't - the Fey told me they liked me, but I must GO HOME now. Not wanting to just drop out of a ritual I was already bound into, I did my best to hold up my corner without the allies I was supposed to have, and then I paced anxiously while everyone else meditated on their new friendships, and finally went inside and broke down. RJ told me I should sleep on it, and that I certainly wasn't obliged to return for the second half if I wasn't up for it. I concluded that working with the Fey was not something that I should be doing just then, because I needed more stability in my life, and that was the one thing They were in no position to provide.

That was October. The following May, after many, many other things had happened, I ran into that same tall Antlered Fey during a journey ritual for Walpurgisnacht, and again not long thereafter in another journey that involved gathering around a fire to dance. It seemed I had picked up a Fey ally after all, but not for the purposes RJ had instructed us to expect. Since then AF (for I have no better name for Him) looks more like Himself, and less like the sexy friend of mine, but I have seen Him look like a specific boy somebody else was most attracted to, and have concluded that it's part of who He is, that He takes on the facade of greatest desire.

I have met a handfull of others, here and there, but those are the two major experiences I have to describe. I have no idea how to explain how critical or not I was for these. It's more that I had experiences that I had to categorize, and once I categorized them, I discarded whatever other possibilities came up while I was doing the analysis until they should come up again of their own accord.

I always keep a mental tab on the possibility that these are merely constructs in my own mind, but since it doesn't really help me interact with Them to do so, and it doesn't seem to hurt anything for me to treat Them as if They are what I'm told They are, I let it go.

--Ember--
 
 
Haloquin
17:41 / 29.09.06
I always keep a mental tab on the possibility that these are merely constructs in my own mind, but since it doesn't really help me interact with Them to do so, and it doesn't seem to hurt anything for me to treat Them as if They are what I'm told They are, I let it go.

Thanks Ember, thats a perfect way of putting it.
 
 
illmatic
14:34 / 30.09.06
like you're not trying to gather information about people's experiences, you're merely waiting to bust our myths.

I kind of assume you didn't actually mean it that way?


Not at all. I was reacting to what had gone before in the thread, to be honest. There hadn’t been any actual reports of experience and I thought requesting some specifics was a good counter to this. Sorry if my tone was a bit “cold” and thanks to both of you for responding at such length.

I generally find I’m much more interested in reading or hearing about read about what had happened to people, than theories and ideas based on that experience. Some occultists tend to erect quite elaborate hierarchies based on unquestioned or unchallenged ideas, and seek out “evidence” that simply confirms their preconceptions. I think it’s always nice to go back to a simple “what actually happened” as a touchstone. This is why I kept out of the thread BTW, as I have little of value to add from my own experience (I’m on a bit of a Barb-moratorium at present also, but that’s another story).

Incidentally, I would absolutely recommend Barry Patterson’s book The Art & Conversation of the Genius Loci (Capall Bann). It is an absolutely fantastic book about relating to the natural world and the magical consequences of doing so. Possibly it’s not available in the ‘states, but it’s worth paying the shipping costs.
 
 
Rigettle
13:01 / 03.10.06
I agree very much with what Princess said, as well as Saturn's Nod.

My view of Faery, based on my own experience & a certain amount of bookish research, is that Faery is a condition & that "They" (bless 'em) are the beings we meet when we are in that condition, or in touch with it.

As to them being non-human, or alternatively a specific class of spirit, I can't agree. In some of the "Celtic Countries" they are often identified with the dead, for instance.

An easy way of putting it that I like to use is that Fairies are just spirits & may come in all varieties (human & non-human), shape & size.

As to whether they have an external, objective reality, I don't see how that could ever be decided in a definitive way. Perhaps what is more important than exercising ourselves over what is real or not is to have some awareness of how this category of experience affects us & how we behave toward it.

Popularly folks talk about seeing the Fairies but for me, for the most part, Faery is a presence (singular or plural) in the land, that I feel. It often seems a challenging presence, which demands response or acknowledgement.

BTW Capall Bann have distributors in the US & Australia.
 
 
Quantum
15:01 / 03.10.06
I got an impression of a humanoid creature that had skin like a tree and a long nose ember

Echoing Pegs, I haven't had much to contribute but am appreciative of the personal accounts. Ember, was it a visual impression, or a feeling, or in your minds eye/imagination? As someone who doesn't deal with angels or faeries at all I'm interested to know what the experience is like. Like a daydream, like an hallucination, like a spooky feeling?
 
 
Princess
16:37 / 03.10.06
Casual/chance meetings with the fey, for me, often seem to take on the flavour of a daydream. Just characters that pop-up whilst your navel gazing. An important part of Fey identity, to me, is that they are liminal beings. When I experience Fey places\beings, they tend to be at the border of things. I usually find them at dusk, (dusk always seems to be explicitly Fey to me, there is a physical sense of the world just being "different" when dusk is happening to it.) or during daydreams (the space between conscious\unconscious) or when I'm hovering between the physical and non-physical.
I'm not sure exactly how much of it I'm creating. But, with the Fey more than most magic I do, it never seems that clear cut. The distinction between me\we\they is blurred, and as to who is pulling the strings I can only guess. The real/unreal divide seems to be largely ignored by most of the fey I've met. My basic rule is "if it says it exists then it would be rude to disbelieve it".
Oddly, the only times when I have got a definite, "this is not in your head" ping from the Fey has been when they are getting aggresive. I went walking along the dovedale river with the SO (both river and SO where lovely) and we found a cave going down into the ground. We started to walk down into the cave when we both got a sense of unease. Walking abit further down we both started to hear scary, (for no real reason I can explain, it was just water dripping on the floor) confrontational, aggresive sounds from deep in the cave. I saw (in a literal, there, in my face, I thought it was real, way) a mask flash up in the darkness of the cave and give us a very dirty look. There was a general flashing, like the flashes you get after looking at a bright light, and a sense that things where moving and trying to be seen. This lasted for maybe two seconds. We both took the hint and left immediately.
Another time, I walked up constitution hill in Aberystwyth, and sat watching the sea with a friend. I'd been talking to the wind (which I sometimes consider fey, sometimes not) and listening to the sea, enjoying the night and just generally being present in the area when I got a sudden flash in my mind. Very vivid. It was an image of tall, dark figures walking up the slope. I got a defintie sense of "leave". Not really threatening, just a warning that if we stayed bad things would happen and if they had to do that to us they wouldn't care that much. Explaining this to the friend was hard.
More than once I've been pixie-led, to the extent where I've walked through places I'm very familiar with, spaces less than a street's width wide, and been lost. This was, again, with the SO. He's quite tuned in to stuff, and started telling me about prescences he felt (which matched, in a pretty unpleasent way, local folklore about the area) so we left. I acted stupidly and got angry and tried to play the big,strong,super occultist by dragging him through the trees and mud with a sort of "fuck you fey" attitude. Obviously, on their turf, at midnight, this was stupid. We got lost in a part of the woods that I haven't been able to find since.
One nice, non-daydreamy, experience I had was when I was still in school. I saw the frost on the tree and then, in a way which seemed perfectly normal at the time, I was looking at it from a different perspective. I couls see the tree but I couls see it covered in lights and more ridiculously beautiful than I can properly remember now. When I dropped back into normal thinking (after probably half a second off with the fairys) I was stunned and shocked. But over all it was a nice experience.
 
 
EmberLeo
16:52 / 03.10.06
Quantum: You're not quoting me, that was Haloquin.

--Ember--
 
 
Quantum
17:34 / 03.10.06
Wups, sorry Ember! Halo, I'm interested in whether it was a visual impression or more like an instinct, as the only entity work I've done has been in dreaming where it's primarily visual.
 
 
Quantum
17:44 / 03.10.06
So I looked towards that direction. Haloquin

This is what I'm interested in really, people's different experiences of seeing, from prophetic visions to visualisation to second sight. There's an experiential difference (for example) between being deliberately open and receptive to seeing subtle/astral/etheric thngs and seeing something like the pentagram in the LBRP, something you've effectively created. I hope I'm making sense, maybe a new thread is in order so I don't rot this.
 
 
illmatic
17:50 / 03.10.06
I've have visual impressions "spring into life" in meditation/ritual before. Quite rarely admittedly, but all of a sudden they take on a life of their own, I'm not imagining it or sustaining any more (as in LBRP). I was assumiming Haloquin meant something like the former, but I might be wrong. Interesting distinction, though.
 
 
EmberLeo
02:36 / 04.10.06
Quantum: For what it's worth, along those lines, I have a whole spectrum of "seeing" ranging in clarity from the straightforward physical visual, and things seen in dreams, to the vizualization in Journey, which is more on par with how I visualize characters and scenes in novels while I read, and then the more confusing issue of seeing something subtle with my eyes that pairs immediately with a more dramatic vizualization.

I have, in dreams, seen some fey, including one (who might more accurately be called an elemental, I don't know) who had leafy vines for hair, and fine-grain tree bark for skin - she was absoloutely beautiful, and the image was VERY vivid.

--Ember--
 
 
Quantum
09:15 / 04.10.06
Yeah, I know what you mean. I've been pondering the difference between the liminal visuals you get when dropping off to sleep, when your thoughts are moving from conscious to unconscious control, and the waking hallucinations in altered states (like afterimages almost) and things like seeing auras. I have a spectrum probably similar to what you describe, ranging from a table at work in the day, through optical illusions and Rorschach tests, through auras and 'invisible' things, to visualisations and daydreams all to dreams. My spectrum presumes two ends, conscious/aware/mundane to unconscious/immersed/magical (although it's more complex than that of course) and I suspect there are several spectra at right angles to each other, and different for different people.

Hang on, my metaphor is tangled. I think different people frame their experiences in different ways but that those experiences share a commonality. Just as I may see red and Monsieur Papus may see rouge, our descriptions refer to the same experience of blood.

Reassure me this isn't rot- if I see a spirit and someone else sees a fairy, we might be seeing the same thing right? Even to experiencing the same impressions (e.g. a bark-skinned Froud-like creature).
 
 
Quantum
09:21 / 04.10.06
I (and in my opinion, everyone does this) see everything through a variety of personal filters, it would be extremely wierd if I could see (hear, feel, etc.) them objectively.

To go back to Haloquin's opening post, I'm talking about the filters in that way, but the subjective/objective distinction as a spectrum (the table is objective, my dreams subjective) because we see faeries and the like at different points on the spectrum. A vivid dream, a half-glimpsed figure in the woods, concievably an elf standing on a table at work in full view with everyone running around freaking out.
 
 
Rigettle
16:13 / 04.10.06
Great post from Princess Swashbuckling! Sounds similar to my own experiences.

An important part of Fey identity, to me, is that they are liminal beings. When I experience Fey places\beings, they tend to be at the border of things. I usually find them at dusk, (dusk always seems to be explicitly Fey to me, there is a physical sense of the world just being "different" when dusk is happening to it.) or during daydreams (the space between conscious\unconscious) or when I'm hovering between the physical and non-physical.

Dusk being a liminal condition. I really resonate with that. Voices in the grey wind noise. Movement of plants in the half light. Certain kinds of quiet - like an almost unnatural silence. A sudden change in the quality of the light. Definitely my own mind in a liminal state.

Oddly, the only times when I have got a definite, "this is not in your head" ping from the Fey has been when they are getting aggresive.

Something I discovered in some reading about Scottish seers was that for them, Faery actually acts out things that are going to happen. I've experienced Them act out my stuff in front of me. Weird. Did you ever read Peake's "Titus Alone"? This can be confusing because you could say it's a projection of internal material, but some how it has a strange quality that let's you know it's not. But then the ultimate liminal state happens on the self/ other edges - the good old inside/ outside fractal. There's no reality test.

Faery is a real & powerful category of experience, however anyone might seek to explain it.

Enough, too much.
 
 
Princess
18:12 / 04.10.06
Quantum, it's an interesting question. There is definitely a tendency for people to find the Fey and equate them with their own brand of nature spirit. The reverse is also true.
Up thread I mentioned the similarity between stories of the Djinn and stories of Changelings. This kind of thing is quite common. In old rabbinical thought ( sayeth "Eurydice, Heurodis, and the Noon-Day Demon" by John Block Friedman, an article about the Briton Ley called "Sir Orfeo" which you might need a Jstor account to view.) demons were at their most powerful at noon due to the weakness caused by the sun's heat in humans. This belief, the author argues, came to replace the idea of the fey twilight. As the Celtic Fey and the Judaeo-Christian demons became increasingly conlfated in middle English christian thought, the importance of Fey as liminal characters was replaced by the idea of importance of Fey as demonic characters. Multiple illustrations of the period(many in the article) show Faeries abducting or overcoming women, not only at noon, but in the shapes of "dragonopedes" or snakes with human faces, a visual shorthand for the devil.

I think Sir Orpheo is a good example of the way Faery can spread and infiltrate itself into other categories of being. (Don't read it for any other reason. It's written in English so old it needs translating and the story you get at the end was done so much better by Ovid). The story of Sir Orpheo is a retelling of the classical Orpheus and Eurydice story, but reshaped to fit with the celtic and christian themes familiar with the middle-english reader. Orpheo is a son of the classical greek deities (including the unusual choice of "King Juno" if I remember correctly), these spirits are not presented as fey. However, when Lord Hades (also quite famously greek) steals away Heurodis (Eurydice v2.0) he is explicitly Fey, he is no longer a god, but a lord of Faery. Queen Heurodis is not taken to the underworld, but into a fey-space. Though he is charmed by Orpheo's playing (as in the greek myth) it is eventually a game of chess and rash promise that get Eurydice back. Both of these are common celtic themes and suggest a Fey-supernature rather than an Olympian one.

The relationship here between the spirits of the dead, the deities of the greeks, the spirits of hell and the label of "fey" are complex here. This is how I feel Fey relate, generally, to other world views. It fits into them snugly, and is very willing to change shape/content/morality so that it can do so. People want their spirits to be your spirits. The Fey, due to their inherently undecided nature, make such syncretism easy.
Although, and to be honest I'm not quite sure I can verbalise why, (other than fey magic has formed a big part of my practice and after a while the flavour of fey gets easier to intuit), I can see it as much more likely that you would find a fey being and experience it as something else than vice-versa. Another intrinsicly fey quality, to me, is one of "glamour". Glamour, for those that don't know, is a sort of faery magic about concealment and disguise, it's about shape-changing and deceit. A faery appearing behind an angels face seems much more "feel-righty" to me than the other way round. This may just reflect my general wariness around the fey.

There's a quite cool book in my university library caled something like "Evolution of the Faery in the British Isles" that discusses the changes and adaptation in the UK's approach to the Fey. Is there anyone here who would like me to get it out? I wouldn't mind bringing a wider knowledge (than mine) to the table. And I'm wary that, myself in particular, may be heading towards "fey are anything you want", which doesn't sit right for me. I'd be interested in a comparison between different experiences\accounts\fictions of the fey between different times and people. Whilst I wait for morning to return so I can go get that out, I think it might be interesting if people started to dress out the borders (hazy as they might be) to what they perceive as Fey. Whilst I'll concede that I'll admit any spirit into the category of Fey if they claim it, there is certainly a set of qualities that make me sit up and say "Faery". I've already mentioned liminal status and glamour. From personal experience I'd also add a tendency towards the mercurial, and the lurid. Do other people have their own faery "aesthetic". Where do people feel the boundaries of fey may be?
 
 
Rigettle
08:54 / 05.10.06
Thinking of how views of Faery evolve. May I recommend "Explore Fairy Traditions" by Jeremy Harte, Heart of Albion Press? He takes a moderately sceptical (in the true sense of the word) view, linking changes in the stories over time with changes in social conditions. It's a concise & thorough book & a bit different from those all too popular books which seek evidence to support the writer's own (romanticist) views.

Speaking of HOAP some of you might enjoy "Myths of Reality" by Simon Danser. Bang on! Made me laugh & shout with joy & anger. If this interests you then do a google for "Foamy Custard".

Speaking of nature spirits, I must raise the point: how do people use the term, the concept of "nature"? Particularly on their magical or spiritual path. I'll start a thread, if there's interest & it hasn't been done to death already.
 
 
Haloquin
12:00 / 06.10.06
was it a visual impression, or a feeling, or in your minds eye/imagination? As someone who doesn't deal with angels or faeries at all I'm interested to know what the experience is like. Like a daydream, like an hallucination, like a spooky feeling?

I've been thinking about how to explain this clearly, This particular event was a combination of the three, as most of my experiences are. They range from just feelings, that I interpret visually, to images that are visual in the same way as a dream image superimposed over the physical world.

When I looked at the tree man if I looked straight at him physically I knew he was there but got no visual impression at all, when I looked using peripheral vision, I could, seemingly physically, actually see a kind of distortion where he was. But otherwise the image was a mental impression in my minds eye that arose from the feeling and was projected like a dream image. I "just knew" what he looked like.

Does this help?
 
 
Quantum
15:25 / 06.10.06
Like a heat haze or a faint star or something difficult to see visually, which was the focus of a feeling associated with the image of the fairy? I sort of know what you mean, but it's so difficult to describe. Especially to someone who hasn't experienced the same thing, e.g. me.
 
 
illmatic
15:44 / 07.10.06
Speaking of nature spirits, I must raise the point: how do people use the term, the concept of "nature"? Particularly on their magical or spiritual path. I'll start a thread, if there's interest & it hasn't been done to death already.

I think this could be a really interesting thread. I can't say I've done much magick out nature, having been a city dweller all of my life. However, it's something I have an increasing interest in and just in terms of practical day to day inspiration, I find my brief contact with the natural world something worth noting and building on. It might just be paying attention to the birds outside, or trying to figure out a bit more about the trees in my street. It's something I have an increasing interest in. I'd particuarly be interested in a discussion giving practical tips integrating this stuff into a city lifestyles.

Some starting points for discussion might be the way in which we tend to polarise culture and nature and don't recognise that this is in itself a contrast, and related to that the romanticism that attaches itself to modern paganism. I think I'll start a thread.
 
 
Haloquin
19:56 / 07.10.06
Quantum; That sounds about right. You know when you start to fall asleep and you get images of things, like just before a dream? Sometimes its like having those images come up while being awake. But to describe this particular instance as like trying to see heat haze using peripheral vision, with the feeling of fey in that direction, works well.

Ooh, shall go poke nature thread
 
  
Add Your Reply