BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Pity Party

 
 
Whisky Priestess
14:25 / 11.09.06
OK, so I've been working on my dissertation in Creative Writing (stories, essentially) for the last God knows how many months. Thing is, everyone's work goes into an anthology which was published last week some time. The night before (the night before) I had to hand in my dissertation I was pretty shocked to find this nasty little number in my inbox:


Hi Whisky,

I'm not sure if you're aware of this, but copies of the anthology have been available as of today, which is how I've gotten to read your story for the first time. You can imagine how intrigued I was to discover that one of your characters is named Surname--and how much more intriguing it is that throughout the entire process of publishing the anthology, you never thought it might be a common courtesy to run that particular name by me. Were this just a random story of yours, I wouldn't particularly care, but to use it in your contribution in an anthology that includes me, and my apparently irresistable surname, without at least checking for my input is at the very least unprofessional, and at the most impolite, along with a few other adjectives that don't particularly bear repeating. Needless to say, I will be expecting an apology from you the next time we cross paths.

Firstname Surname.


(Names changed to protect the ... well, hardly innocent, but you know what I mean)

I think that what ze is accusing me of - explicitly, unprofessionalism (implying that I should run all character names past my lawyers/colleagues every time I get anything published - hmm) and implicitly, defaming hir or taking a cheap and nasty shot at hir via a minor character in a short story - is pretty nasty, and it makes me queasy, angry and sad all at once to read or re-read the above because it's quite obvious how horrible a person the writer considers me to be.

Needless to say, the accuser's surname is a fairly common name that I didn't associate in the least with hir when I wrote the story, and the character in question is a different gender, age, nationality and profession. The character is, however, described as a "twat", which is probably at the root of hir paranoid reaction. In short, I am innocent.

I've emailed back very politely explaining that any association etc. was the farthest thing from my mind, and that I was shocked and saddened ze had reacted in the way ze has, no offence meant etc. (I should add for the record that we didn't get along very well, but it was more of a feeling than out in the open and no angry words or personal comments have been exchanged before).

And I suppose that ought to be the end of it. Although I am still very angry at the things ze implies about me, I find vendettas exhausting and nauseating.

Except.

This person is going to be at UEA for another four years, doing a doctorate. Ze's obviously ... well, over-sensitive to say the least. Academia is notoriously bitchy but this is really the first brush I've had with that kind of bile. What if ze imagines or initiates a feud with somebody else in which the innocent party is accused of anything similar (or plagiarism, or underhandedness of whatever) made to suffer or look bad, and there's no way to tell from the outside who's in the right? I guess I just don't think that ze should get away with making such sweeping and unfounded statements to me in the first place, let alone to anyone else. And you can bet your sweet ass ze'll manage to make hirself a few enemies (real or imagined) over the next four years. The poor bastards.

Basically I want the above to go on record in case ze pulls this shit with somebody else. But of course I could have done the sort of nasty, childish thing ze suggests - there's no way for me to have my brain scanned to show my intentions (or lack of them).

Will I just make myself look bad if I bring this to the attention of my tutor? Or will it be worth it, in the case of potential future issues this person may have and drag others into, to have some evidence of hir prior inappropriate behaviour? And how bad is it, after all? Read it through, imagine your name at the top, tell me what you feel. Am I overreacting?

(oh, and sorry for the immense length of this post. I've been brooding over this more than I realised, evidently)
 
 
Ticker
14:46 / 11.09.06
**HUGGLES**

You are not over reacting your writing and your community are very precious to you.


I would take a moment and recall where exactly I chose the surname from (can of soup, ex neighbor, TV show etc) and yes I would mention it to the tutor in terms of solicting group (not on your work) management suggestions.

Obviously Surname is self absorbed that they assume they are the inspiration for your selection of a fictional name tag. Their shitty behavior and note should be brought to the attention of the wrangler of students. The more you treat it as a possible injury to your community the better your standing in the community. Mind you not an injury to a *person* especially one who is this insecure but that you do not wish the issue to poison the waters you all collectively bath in.

**HUGGLES**
 
 
Hallo, Paper Spaceboy
14:47 / 11.09.06
First off, congratulations on being anthologized.

I think it may be worth mentioning it to your tutor, but I'd avoid making a big deal out of it - honestly, this kind of thing is just going to crop up now and then. People can be extremely sensitive, obviously, and not everyone is going to react rationally to your stories. Literary feuds happen, even if they are a bit ridiculous. As long as it doesn't range into Evelyn Lau/WP Kinsella territory - there was a libel suit filed there - it's just a fact of writing and publishing. Best to rise above it.

If the name's common, well, that's ze's problem for reading into the story something that wasn't intended. If it really bothers you, pull an Octavio Paz and re-edit the story to change the name. This does happen, even if things get published; Paz is known to walk around in bookshops and deface his own books to make changes in them.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
14:50 / 11.09.06
xk makes a great deal of sense. Sounds like Surname has paranoia problems of hir own ("self-disgust is self-obsession, honey", and all that). Not sure on the actual "what to do" front, but as I say, xk's advice sounds reasonable. But I really wouldn't let the bad feeling get to you- don't feel bad over the contents of someone else's head, basically.
 
 
Whisky Priestess
15:06 / 11.09.06
Cheers chaps - Papers, exactly - if it had occurred to me that someone on the course had the same surname (which I knew but was not aware of, if you see what I mean) and might take it badly, I would have changed the name pre-publication. I mean, I don't care, I'm not looking to whup up a shitstorm, it's only the name of a minor character for God's sake.

I think if the piece gets published again (really unlikely, as it's only a fragment of a story in any case) I would be torn between the desire not to change my work one iota on account of someone else's KONSPIRAZEE!11! theory, and the desire to be the bigger person. (And the desire to make the character a paranoid, insecure writer with delusions of significance, of course - although then I'll probably get OMFG that's me!!! emails from every writer I've ever met) Hmm. It's a tough one. Thanks for the advice (and huggles) though.
 
 
Hallo, Paper Spaceboy
15:15 / 11.09.06
Princess: (And the desire to make the character a paranoid, insecure writer with delusions of significance, of course - although then I'll probably get OMFG that's me!!! emails from every writer I've ever met)

It's not my most favourite or anything, but you should definitely read Martin Amis's "The Information" regarding paranoid, insecure writers.

Every piece of bitter resentment levelled at you by people like this is a piece that can be added to your thick skin.
 
 
grant
15:22 / 11.09.06
If it's truly a common surname (Johnson? Smith? Tucker?), then yeah, it might be worth pointing it out to someone in charge.

I wouldn't sound too offended or indignant over it, though. It sounds a little loopy, but understandable enough. It's weird seeing your name in someone's fiction.
 
 
All Acting Regiment
16:01 / 11.09.06
Whatever you do, don't be agressive back to them because that'll give them a reason to think you would put them in your story. Perhaps see if they've just broken up with their partner or something, they might have had an off day when they nasty-grammed you with that absolutely pathetic email.
 
 
Whisky Priestess
16:11 / 11.09.06
Yeah, I know - I keep trying to see it from hir perspective and although the name's not that common and nobody else on the course shares it that I'm aware of, plenty of other people do - it's not that uncommon either.

I dunno. I'd probably get a funny feeling if things happened the other way around, but
a) my surname really is pretty rare - I've never met anyone outside family who shares it although a couple of celebrities sort of do
b) I wouldn't immediately assume guilt and demand an apology for something they may not have been aware of - if I felt offended by it I would maybe have pointed it out and said "did you realise?" or "do you mind explaining this?"

But you know what, I wouldn't want to think anyone would do that in the first place, so I hope I'd be a bit more open-minded in my response.

Maybe I'll just bring it to my tutor's attention and ask her what I should do, and if she says to shrug it off I'll just forgeddabout it. Fortunately my tutor is WISE. Except, shit, she's left the University. Damn.
 
 
Whisky Priestess
16:15 / 11.09.06
Legba: you're right, I was thinking that too. Will re-read my reply but I remember going over and over it to make sure it was polite and dismayed, not snarky or aggressive.

It's entirely possible Firstname was cracking under the stress of dissertation pressure, but that's something we've all got to handle. And I'm pretty sure ze wasn't working six days a week at the same time. But yeah, family or relationship probs occurred to me too - which was why I didn't hit back with a "how VERY dare you!? I'm calling my lawyer!!" response
 
 
Spaniel
19:24 / 11.09.06
That's horrible, Whiskey. I've always found animosity, mutual or otherwise, exhausting and very tough to deal with, so I can empathise.

With that in mind, don't be too hard on the twunce. While they're being a little paranoid, if there's always been a low level spikiness between the two of you, and communication has always been kept to a minimum, I can understand how they reached their wrong-headed conclusion.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
19:52 / 11.09.06
I think if it's "Smith" or "Jones", it might be worth at the very least forwarding the email to all your mates... which you possibly already have. If it's "Arbuthnot", less so.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
19:56 / 11.09.06
Sorry. Bit more seriously - that is unnecessary aggro,and a pain in the tits. In this case, however, possibly the best response is to rise above. You have hir email, and a copy of yours. If it seems to be becoming some form of campus rumour or similar, it might need to be taken further, but is UEA really that starved of gossip. I can't think of much less edifying than somebody claiming that the Smith in that story is totally them - would anyone even be so foolish?
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
19:56 / 11.09.06
Gah! I mean, in public.
 
 
Dead Megatron
20:02 / 11.09.06
Ah, the self-absorbed paranoia of Academia. If you're going to follow that career, WP, my cynical life-wary advice would be "get used to it". It is quite common, I'm afraid. (it's only a small percentage of academia who acts like that, of course, but it is enough to be noticeable)

Talking to your tutor would be a good move. Whatever you do, though, save that e-mail for future reference. If the surname is usual enough, and your conscience is clean, stand your ground.
 
 
MattShepherd: I WEDDED KALI!
23:03 / 11.09.06
Other than being described with an unflattering euphemism once, exactly how horrible WAS this character? Maybe I'm paranoid, but I can honestly see how I'd be pissed if somebody I didn't get along with threw my name in a story, dismissed the character as a "twat" and moved right along.

I "double" names all the time... most recently, and embarrassingly, sending an artist a pitch script with a major character from his book's name being used as a major character name in my script (it's also a childhood friend's name, I swear). I'm sure you didn't do this on purpose.

But if you didn't get along with the person in the first place, I can see how they'd read that and think they'd been burned.
 
 
The resistable rise of Reidcourchie
08:35 / 12.09.06
Sadly, I would also suggest keeping the e-mail and your response, do notify your tutor but don't make a big deal about it just in case it comes back to bite you (it's a shame that people have to do things like this but still). If you come across this person and they want to discuss it try and explain what happened, if they don't get it try and stay away from them.

If they do decide to go for you (if I read this right) then it seems there just another student and have just as much power as you. Also if they're going to act like this a lot I think you'll find that people will see through them pretty quickly.

Also Reid & Courchie both very good sirnames if you're ever short of one, you may even describe the character as a Twat I want be upset in my desperate quest for vicarious attention.
 
 
Whisky Priestess
08:54 / 12.09.06
Ah, the self-absorbed paranoia of Academia. If you're going to follow that career, WP, my cynical life-wary advice would be "get used to it".

Thank God, I'm not going to follow that career. Not at UEA, certainly.

The character in question is small but significant - the two protagonists are drama students and he is their course teacher, a failed actor and a rather prurient, arrogant ... well, twat. He is never seen, only referred to by the two main characters (who are in fact the ones who slag him off - there is no omniscient narrator as it's a first-person persepctive).

I will admit that this character is partially based on someone I was taught by ten years ago - but that's why the name was changed to something completely different from the guy's real name.

As to the unusualness of the name ... I'd say it's neither as common as Smith/Robinson/Clark nor as uncommon as Featherstonehaugh, but, like most people's, somewhere in the middle. Googling the surname alone, McDougall has a similar frequency (about 3.5-4 million hits) - if that's any help.
 
 
The resistable rise of Reidcourchie
08:58 / 12.09.06
Smith isn't common it's popular.
 
 
Whisky Priestess
12:21 / 12.09.06
And very melodious too, if I may say so. Sorry if I've offended any Smiths by implying they are common. They are beautiful, unique snowflakes, as are we all.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
12:26 / 12.09.06
The Matrix Reloaded had loads of Smiths and it was rubbish.

Morrissey managed to do pretty well with four, though.
 
 
The resistable rise of Reidcourchie
13:38 / 12.09.06
Actually the band is actually a stain on the good name of Smith.
 
 
paranoidwriter waves hello
13:43 / 12.09.06
Don't you mean Smythe or Smithers or...

That's it!

I'm off to do a tribute band, using the name "The Smithies"...

"Please, please, please, let me get what I want..."
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
13:44 / 12.09.06
Or you could call it The Smithees and then deny all knowledge that you were connected with it...
 
 
pointless & uncalled for
13:46 / 12.09.06
I've told you about this before Alan
 
 
The resistable rise of Reidcourchie
13:46 / 12.09.06
The P's silent.
 
  
Add Your Reply