BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Fun Home

 
 
sleazenation
21:58 / 29.08.06
The past year has seen quite an array of interesting graphic novels published... I'm still working my way through my own personal list of graphic novels to watch out for, but one that caught my interest from the moment I heard about it was Alison Bechdel's autobiographical GN, Fun Home. It's and interesting book that I have mixed feelings about and I want to see what other people have made of it...

How would I describe Fun Home? Aside from refering to it as an autobiographical piece, I'm not sure. I don't think I'd attempt to compare it to Marjane Satrapi's Persepolis, although both graphic novels are reminisences of girls growing up... But Fun Home goes a lot further than reporting reminicences, it actively attempts to interrogate and interpret them... This is particularly true in the books main theme, the relationship between the author as a homosexual woman and her father, who never quite proclaimed himself as a homosexual...

I guess in all biography there is a tension between relating historical occurences and manufacturing a narative of the past (which may or may not agree with eachother), and I can't quite decide whether or not I find Betchdel's book more compromised by this or more honest about its impact...

I'll stop there because I don't want to bog this thread down in my own take on the book before it has really had a chance to begin. I'm also worried that I'm making a multifaceted, beautiful, interesting and intriguing book sound completely dull - it really isn't -

So, please, someone put me out of my misery and come and tell me what you thought of Fun Home....
 
 
smurph
04:31 / 30.08.06
I really liked this. I was amazed at how complex a picture of her father Bechdel paints. She shows him to us from so many perspectives, each of her memories revealing another aspect of him. It's almost overwhelming.

At first I thought there were too many literary references. After a second read, however, I was intrigued by the idea of reading so intensely that the world of literature and the day to day world continually overlap.

I have been wondering if the various appearances of sunbeam bread can be thought of as a form of foreshadowing.
 
 
sleazenation
14:54 / 03.09.06
The Sunbeam bread thing was something that I noticed, but since the method of his demise was reviealed in chapter two most of the bread appearences can't really be thought of as foreshadowing, can they? Or perhaps there is more of a suggestion of fate...

Actually, one of the things about the book that I still feel ambivilent to is the overpowering array of literary allusions the author invokesto describe various aspects of her relationship with her parents... I realise that part of the reason that they are there is to express the massive gulf of emotion and experience between Betchdel and her parents, she actually overtly states this quite early on, but somehow it still felt incredibly laboured in places and added to the massive amount of interpretation the narrative involves it often felt that Fun Home was veering away from autobiography and into the realm of creating a fictional father-figure more more present and more fleshed-out than the real man had been.

And, yeah, a lot of this feels unfair of me, particularly since much of the family Bechdel is also writing about are still very much alive - Both of Art Spiegelman's parents were dead before he completed Maus and he had no living relatives in his immediate family. I'm not sure how much, if any, self censorship is at work...

But yeah, I guess what makes the book the most interesting, and the most problematic, is the level to which Bechdel is revealing her father's sexuality and to what extent she is creating it...
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
17:39 / 06.09.06
I did enjoy this, with some chapters she'd reveal a bit more about family life, I got so caught up that I'd sometimes forget that her Dad died and be jarred when she reminded me. And I don't see the problem Sleaze mentions, to me this is really Alison's autobiography, no matter what she and the dustcover says. To me the fascinating thing is the relationship with her and this fictional recreation of her father.
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
06:12 / 08.09.06
There's an interview with Alison Bechdel in the latest Bat Segundo Show.
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
10:41 / 16.10.06
Guardian interview. Interestingly this book seems to have pissed off her mother.
 
 
Janean Patience
10:42 / 16.01.07
This half-thought-out piece of shit has reminded me that I meant to articulate my awed admiration of Fun Home. Useful information contained within the link: it was named as Time's Book of the Year, an astonishing achievement for a graphic novel and one I've seen reported nowhere until now. The blogger's first couple of reasons why it's received such acclaim are probably pretty valid. Being published by a major house wins you credibility, and autobiography (as with Joe Sacco's reportage) isn't judged by the same standards as other genres in comics. Non-fiction comics in general are given a free pass, automatically taken seriously.

The other reasons should, at best, be ignored. If the book's been a sensation it's because it offers something entirely new, both in subject matter and style. The graphic techniques Bechdel uses aren't enormously innovative, but the storytelling techniques are. The central fact of the story, of a gay father's suicide at the same time his gay daughter comes out, is revealed early on. The book then goes on to analyse it from every angle, to closely observe what little evidence there is - physical, in tapes and annotated books, and through stories and memories and reactions to homosexuality. It's a detective story where all the facts are already in, and the detective only wants to better understand why events unfolded as they did, if the tragedy had a root cause.

sleazenation: One of the things about the book that I still feel ambivalent about is the overpowering array of literary allusions the author invokes to describe various aspects of her relationship with her parents...

Christmas Day round my house, and my partner remarks that all my mother, brother and I did when we'd open our presents was to sit in the same room and silently read. I had to explain that's good as it gets, this is our family in harmony. Maybe we're not quite so literary and artistic as Bechdel's bunch but the idea of a family who only really understand each other through books is not an unfamiliar one to me. The literary allusions were about detecting subtext, a vital life skill in a family with big secrets that doesn't talk. And having discovered your family in books, you explore and understand them through the same medium.

I guess what makes the book the most interesting, and the most problematic, is the level to which Bechdel is revealing her father's sexuality and to what extent she is creating it...

The structure, analysing the same people and the singular event of her father's suicide from different angles, was IMO Bechdel's attempt to build a three-dimensional image of her father. Constructing a hologram from reflected light, then checking it against the reality, the fragments of the real man she once knew, reminded me of high-tech archaeology. There was a feeling of compulsion about the book, as if it gathered momentum as it went on and the project of knowing her father became vital in knowing herself...

I loved this. It's not been widely publicized in the UK - is it unavoidable in the US? Is it in comic shops, or just bookstores? Did anyone else like it as much as I did?
 
 
Hallo, Paper Spaceboy
13:37 / 16.01.07
Still haven't read this but I was appalled to discover it wasn't in the system at work so I had one of the librarians order it. I look forward to its arrival so I can snatch it up and read.
 
 
sleazenation
20:01 / 17.01.07
I loved this. It's not been widely publicized in the UK - is it unavoidable in the US? Is it in comic shops, or just bookstores? Did anyone else like it as much as I did?

Well I found it quite easily in the UK, first came across it in a comic shop (GOSH) and attended the talk Bechdel did to promote the book at the ICA, but I'm well aware that I might well be in the minority. It would seem that few people that 'read comics' would read this one. Which is a shame because for all its faults, and it does have faults, it is a beautiful, interesting and thought-provoking book.

(Of course as I type these words I wonder if it is perhaps unreasonable to expect readers of comics to be any less wary of genre/subject matter than readers of books of watchers of film).
 
 
XyphaP
02:31 / 18.01.07
Janean Pictures- Yeah, Burgas' piece was just an impression. He didn't like the style and looked at it with a critical instead of an appreciative eye. His major criticism of the work is that he didn't like its style. Oh, and that it got tremendous publicity (notice how he rarely talks about teh work itself but only its exceptional publication history).

It's certainly one of the year's best. I'd switch Fate of the Artist with it depending on my mood, but it's one of those rare pieces of art where everything is considered and works towards the whole, especially the dry style filled with literary allusions. Instead the admittedly simple story of the father dying and changing things for the daughter, we actually have work by her and can construct her character as much from the art as from the narrative.

That said, I usually like Burgas' writing. He certainly knows his superhero comics and writes with a rare critical energy.
 
 
Janean Patience
07:39 / 26.01.07
Burgas' piece was just an impression. He didn't like the style and looked at it with a critical instead of an appreciative eye. His major criticism of the work is that he didn't like its style. Oh, and that it got tremendous publicity (notice how he rarely talks about teh work itself but only its exceptional publication history).

Having read a second review of the piece, I was probably too harsh on Burgas. His annoyance is the annoyance of any genre fan: "I see Life of Pi is nominated for the Booker, while M John Harrison's Light is scandalously ignored."

I need to read Fun Home again, definitely. Perhaps it's not surprising given the literary background she outlines, but it's a strange visual approach from a writer/artist. I'm more used to people who draw their own work doing extraordinary things with the art: the black-and-white morality of Miller's Sin City, the incredible innovation of Dave Sim and his use of art to express his character's inner lives on the outside, the recurring symbols and images of David Mack's Kabuki, the yearning in Seth's unpeopled landscapes.

In Fun Home, the writing and the narrative definitely take precedence. For much of the book this could be a prose memoir adapted for comics; the visuals are illustrative rather than expressive. They accompany the text. But on another level, they're perfectly linked and synchronised with Bechdel's narrative, pinning her interpretation of events down to reality. It's like narration over film footage, where the narrator is telling you how the house felt and what happened there while the camera, unable to deceive, just records the facts. She's forced a split in her own consciousness almost, while the attraction of many writer/artists is that the story, the characters, the visuals are the work of a single hand.
 
 
Jackie Susann
03:55 / 09.03.07
I just got to read this, finally. I enjoyed it, but I think its structure - or lack thereof - hurts it. Am I being boring if I say it would work better if the story was told in a more linear way? I like narrative, and I just couldn't pick out any order to the way she told the story - like she was just remembering another bit and adding that to what she'd already told us.
 
 
Hallo, Paper Spaceboy
05:09 / 09.03.07
There are a more than a dollop of Joycean references in it, aren't there? Possibly that might explain the reason for a more free associative non-structure. Which doesn't work for everyone and it depends on how well tagged each moment is in relation to the others...
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
14:52 / 09.03.07
I like the circular structure. I tend to feel that each pass makes the character of Alison's father seem more and more real and then WHAM! you're reminded that he's dead and not around any more and for me, it does effectively make me feel the loss of it.
 
 
Hallo, Paper Spaceboy
18:42 / 29.05.07
Finally got a hold of a copy through work and read it today, mostly while I sat in the laundromat this morning and then just now finishing it. I quite like the slipping & sliding of time -- events are shown in one section and then revisited later with an added layer of significance, events begin to collate together. The image of her father than Bechdel generates is imcomplete in a tantalizing way - she doesn't know, we don't get to know, and those lingering spaces had texture.

At first, yeah, I wasn't sure about the literary references, but I as the story proceeded they became more important and significant. They worked well, especially when paired with those scenes of confused emotion, when she doesn't know how she's supposed to react to things, or when she doesn't react as she's supposed to but is aware in the process. I liked her reactions to the Addams Family in particular, it was such an intriguing detail...

Crisp drawing style. I've read bits and pieces of Dykes, but I think I'll track down some more.
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
18:33 / 28.03.08
Fun Home being complained about at the University of Utah. Pornographic, apparently.
 
 
Mark Parsons
04:05 / 29.03.08
Lord knows, nobody goes to college to encounter SEX in any manner, least of all in literature.
 
 
Catjerome
01:47 / 30.03.08
I really enjoyed the structure, and now I find that its reflective nature has spoiled me a bit for other memoirs. With each chapter I felt like I was examining a single story through another lens, and with every pass I learned something new or considered already-learned facts from different angles. Now I find myself frustrated reading plain linear memoirs - I miss that sort of reflection and revisiting.
 
  
Add Your Reply