BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


2006 fields medal - maths' nobel (one turned down, one to an aussie!)

 
 
astrojax69
23:44 / 22.08.06
'cause alfred nobel's wife ran off with a mathematician, there is no nobel for mathematics. subsequently, the fields medal is regarded as maths' equivalent:

here is a short piece on the winners - there were four who shared the offer of the award this year (only given every four years) but for the first time, one was declined!

grigory perelman seems to have solved poincare's conjecture but has declined the honour.


also among the winners was terence tao - he is from adelaide australia and was at an event run by the professor i work for in 1999 called 'geniuses prodigies and savants' - he was a child prodigy [his father billy gave a session on 'living with prodigies'. he had three exceptional children]. usually not much comes of them, but once in a while - the real thing!

i get to draft our congratulations letter to him, yay!
 
 
Slate
05:58 / 23.08.06
Yeah Astro, I have been following Grigory with some interest. He is a fairly humble chap who doesn't want much out of life except to solve really hard mathematical problems. I wonder when the movie comes out...
 
 
Lurid Archive
10:40 / 23.08.06
Some people think that Perelman is rather more anti-social than humble. Its pretty extreme, anyway.
 
 
Lurid Archive
21:46 / 23.08.06
Also, and this is the really big news, the expert consensus is that Perelman seems to have proved Thuston's Geometrisation Conjecture, of which Poincare's conjecture is a consequence.

The Geometrisation conjecture is like a periodic table for 3 dimensional objects, so a really big deal...kinda. (Poincare's conjecture would be like filling in the hydrogen entry in that table.)
 
 
Henningjohnathan
22:09 / 23.08.06
I've heard that Perelmen didn't actually publish his proof but he's under consideration because other mathematician's published explaining his proof as posted on the Internet.

Sounds like he really wants nothing to do with the entire community.
 
 
astrojax69
22:49 / 23.08.06
well, good for him, i suppose. can't see a reason obligating him to interact with anyone else if he chooses not to. it seems entirely unconnected with his capacity to do maths and for us to get the results of his doing maths. what more should there be?

anyway, he'll always be remembered by history before anyone else who ever won and accepted the fields, so mebbe he is really just being intricately cunning...
 
 
COG
20:30 / 27.08.06
I´ve just read in the paper that a group of the visiting mathematicians were robbed outside the conference centre by crooks posing as police who asked for their documents etc and then made off with them. How strange.
 
 
DecayingInsect
15:47 / 01.09.06
Well this is a bit off topic but Perelman's disengagement from the mathematical establishment reminds me of Grothendieck.
 
  
Add Your Reply