BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


SBR: I Demand Softcore Homo-Eroticism! [pics]

 
 
Princess
21:30 / 22.08.06
Google yields little help. I was searching for cute\lovely pictures of male kissing male, yet only found on photo bucket. Please help me find nice pictures.
After pictures are submitted they can be rated and commented on by others.

Rules:
1: No naughty bits (unless used in a really really really cute way
2:It must be two "men" or "boys". "Men" in this context not being exactly the same as "Males".
3: Imanges of guys in suits get double points.
 
 
Princess
21:34 / 22.08.06


Because it is a well done photo and it looks sincere.
 
 
Disco is My Class War
03:14 / 23.08.06
"Men" in this context not being exactly the same as "Males".

Princess, great idea for a thread, but I'm not exactly clear on what your parameters are for the differences between 'males' and 'men'. Care to enlighten me?
 
 
Cat Chant
10:41 / 23.08.06
This site and this LJ community may be of interest to you, Princess.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
10:53 / 23.08.06
I suppose "males" could include, for instance, tom-cats, stags, dog-foxes. Seeing them kiss wouldn't be the same.
 
 
Aertho
12:30 / 23.08.06
Is Princess's pic of Blake Harper and Colton Ford?
 
 
Mistoffelees
18:10 / 23.08.06
"Images of guys in suits get double points."

So far, I´m in the lead.


That´s former East German Dictator Erich Honecker locking lips with his comrade Leonid Breschnew.
 
 
Mourne Kransky
18:16 / 23.08.06
And the propagandists told us it was no fun behind the Iron Curtain. Tsch...
 
 
Princess
18:53 / 23.08.06
Basically a female dressed as a bussiness-man can be a "man", but she cannot be a male. "Male" is yes\no scientific thing. "Man" is more to do with social identity and gender constructs. (Thats not an official dictionary thing, but it can serve withing this thread).

It was basically a ploy to get pictures of hot drag kings.
 
 
Princess
19:08 / 23.08.06
Deva is now my bestest best fwend ever. Fankoo Deva.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
19:12 / 23.08.06
Basically a female dressed as a bussiness-man can be a "man", but she cannot be a male. "Male" is yes\no scientific thing. "Man" is more to do with social identity and gender constructs. (Thats not an official dictionary thing, but it can serve withing this thread).

It was basically a ploy to get pictures of hot drag kings.


I don't understand everything in this post.
 
 
Princess
19:34 / 23.08.06
If I'm honest theres a good chance I don't. Anyone who is a bit more studied in Gender theory please correct me. But I had thought there was a distinction between "sex" and "gender". Where Sex refers exclusively to gonadal\chromosonal difference, (ie. "I have balls I am a male"), "gender" refers more to the social construct. I'm not sure if I'm making myself clear, or even if this is a recognised distinction beyond my Literature class. Can anyone who knows better point me towards information on the interwebs? Wonderstar, is there a specific point of the post you find unclear or is it just a general mess (more than possible).
I think what I was trying to do with that rule was open the door to non-traditional versions of masculinity. It was perhaps clumsily put.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
19:53 / 23.08.06
Well, thank you for the invitation Princess Swashbuckling, because I do think it's very positive when people on here accept that they might have been confusing or confused. In turn, I've quite often felt confused or challenged by definitions of maleness and femaleness that I've encountered on Barbelith, but overall I think those challenges have opened my mind to more complete understanding, or at least interesting possibilities.

Which is partly to say that I think other people here are better equipped to "unpack" your post than I am. Also, I'm aware that this is threadrot, sorry.

Basically a female dressed as a bussiness-man can be a "man", but she cannot be a male. "Male" is yes\no scientific thing. "Man" is more to do with social identity and gender constructs.

I'm clear whether you mean "man" in quotation marks (you don't put male in quotation marks), suggesting that a woman dressed as a businessman is a sort of man, a masquerade man (a "man").

(I would also say there's a little ambiguity here because really, if a woman dresses "like a businessman", quite often she would look like a woman: that is, a business suit often isn't any kind of drag of cross-dressing, for a woman.)

Anyway, my main point would be that I understood "masculine", not "man", to more usually indicate a gender construct as opposed to a biological fact.

However, I believe that some people on this forum espouse the idea that someone can identify as male ~ can effectively be male ~ despite having the biological characteristics of a woman: that is, that biology does not actually determine whether you are male or female.

That's an idea that was quite challenging for me when I first encountered it, but I think it's an interesting one.


It was basically a ploy to get pictures of hot drag kings.


I don't know if this is tongue-in-cheek, but I'm confused in that I thought you were asking for pictures of men (people who were born men, who are biologically male) kissing, but now it seems you were asking for pictures of attractive women in male drag, kissing each other. But that could just be that I misunderstood the original request.
 
 
Princess
20:15 / 23.08.06
Thanks for that. I'm a leetle rushed right so I'll have to put off a proper reading of it for the moment.
In terms of what goes in the thread, lets say we limit it to anything that looks like a man? It's all about the aesthetic for me right now.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
20:52 / 23.08.06
OK, that sounds fair to me... people who look like men, kissing. Sorry for interrupting your thead! I don't really think I am even semi-expert about gender politics and the intricacies of these definitions, or the debates around them.
 
 
Mourne Kransky
22:12 / 23.08.06
Homopiratical osculation
 
 
*
00:53 / 24.08.06
Sex is just not cut-and-dried either. I appreciate that you were being inclusive, Princess— awesome— but there isn't as much of a yes/no scientific thing to sex as you think. For one thing, science isn't free of cultural construction; for another, how would you know your hot drag king/female in a business suit was actually an entirely XX, hormonally-normative (whatever that could possibly be), possessed-of-a-vagina-and-ovaries-not-a-penis-or-testicles-not-even-a-little, FEMALE with no biological intersex characteristics whatever? Are there any people here who know this about themselves with 100% confidence? I mean, feel free to start defining "male" and "female" with greater and greater precision, but be aware that the definitions are a lot more arbitrary than we generally take them to be.

How about "men kissing (transmasculine folks included)"?

I'll find you some pics of some hot men, trans and non-trans, a little later if I can get permission to link to them.
 
 
nixwilliams
02:40 / 24.08.06
xoc... omg. excuse me while i go all fangirl for a moment! (i am obsessed with you tube, and i blame things like that)
 
 
Disco is My Class War
02:58 / 24.08.06
It was basically a ploy to get pictures of hot drag kings.

Oh, okay. Now I get it. See, I thought for a moment that you were codifying the other way, in preference for 'real men' (ie, not trans ones.)

And I just went looking for some pics of trannyboys kissing, but didn't find any... There's this (NSW) but they aren't exactly pashin'.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
06:39 / 24.08.06
Next thread: hot boys dressed as girls, kissing.
 
 
Cat Chant
10:02 / 24.08.06
Between miss wonderstarr's suggestion and Xoc's post I am now dead of teh hawwttt.

(Princess, have you tried googling 'fanart slash' or 'slash art' or similar? There are some really nice photomanips out there, if you like photomanips/art. Try The Theban Band for starters: they're a bit soppy, but sweet. Ee, I just found a Lucius/Snape manip eee.)
 
 
Olulabelle
11:43 / 24.08.06
However, I believe that some people on this forum espouse the idea that someone can identify as male ~ can effectively be male ~ despite having the biological characteristics of a woman: that is, that biology does not actually determine whether you are male or female.

That is interesting, whereabouts can I read more?
 
 
miss wonderstarr
14:17 / 24.08.06
I think on "Trans 101", but I may not be able to find anything that supports what I said... I shall have a look. There have been trans-type discussions in quite a few places recently on here. However, to be honest I thought it was either id entity or Mister Disco who was discussing this idea.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
14:34 / 24.08.06
Well, here are some ideas that I think are along those lines. I hope it's OK to quote those people's posts on here, and I'm sorry if by shortening some of these quotations, I've taken anything out of context.

They were part of a discussion on Trans 101.


id entity: Then there's gender identity, which has to do with one's internal experiences and (for some) choices about gender.

Susan Weaving: So someone might *be* female without identifying as female, and alternatively *identify* as female without being female. [...] Just so I'm clear, can you *identify* as female without *really being* female?

Ex: I think my usual assertion that everyone has a right to choose how they identify in gender terms is probably like those rights [freedom of movement, freedom of thought]. I think it would be a terrifying thing to take away from someone and lodge that power of definition somewhere else (one writer, I can't remember who, calls it a 'powerful seizure' to deny it). But I don't know what it guarantees, in concrete terms and in terms of social role. In one sense, then, it's a really wishy-washy assertion; but I've seen the kind of resistance people have to the concept, so I think it may be a useful conceptual building block.

id: I think that our internal identities are also complex.
[...]
..."real" doesn't have a very clear or useful meaning when we're talking about gender. But to me it seems there is something more individual about gender than there is about race or culture. I'm not saying that gender is entirely individualistic, though. I think it just tends to be negotiated in different ways. I usually think of gender being negotiated between two people [...] I think that gender requires trusting a person's identity, and their motivation for expressing an identity.

Deva: I think (pace id) that you can have a gender identification which is not the same as the gender you 'really are'.
 
 
*
18:22 / 24.08.06
Here's something which is on the way to being harder than soft but still not yet hard; how's that?
 
 
Olulabelle
18:36 / 24.08.06
Miss Wonderstarr thank you. I wasn't understanding what you said properly I don't think, because I did follow the trans 101 thread when it was occurring and I understand how people can 'be' male or female without having the relevant genitalia. I thought you were referring to people other than trans people for some reason.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
19:53 / 24.08.06
Well... I described a hypothetical "someone" who "can identify as male ~ can effectively be male ~ despite having the biological characteristics of a woman".

I guess by definition they are trans, just by doing and thinking and identifying in that way.

I hope what I pasted in and tried naively to explain was useful in some way, anyway (for someone!). It is relatively new territory for me to think about.
 
 
Disco is My Class War
04:53 / 25.08.06
Here's something which is on the way to being harder than soft but still not yet hard; how's that?

Well, I get a 403 Forbidden to Access, so it must be hard
 
 
Princess
15:28 / 25.08.06
Xoc...I love you.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
16:13 / 25.08.06
I haven't found any pictures of boys dressed up as girls and kissing, yet. I tried to find some while I was at work, but the guy sharing my office sort of... looked at the screen, so I stopped.

Maybe I will try to make some happen in real life over the weekend, and take pix of it.
 
 
Princess
20:38 / 25.08.06
And in doing so gain my love. I will be with my parents over the weekend. The chances of my mother putting on dad's clothes to make an interesting photo are remote.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
20:43 / 25.08.06
After some searching for images of boys dressed as girls, kissing, I found this nice picture from the website of the Way Out trans club in London. I don't know if it really qualifies for the thread... sorry! They are pretty though, and hugging rather than kissing.

 
 
Princess
21:20 / 25.08.06
I rate the photo as 6. Cute pose, sincere faces, but it does not give me the warm fuzzy feelings.
 
 
Princess
21:32 / 25.08.06
Although...
the one on the left looks like the bastard daughter of Jennifer Anniston and Barbra Streisand. Sorta. Make it an eight.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
21:37 / 25.08.06
"True that" ~ it depends what sort of fuzzy feelings you are looking for, really. Pretty people hugging is fuzzy, though not in the same way as kissing.
 
  
Add Your Reply