|
|
Hell yeah.
Some nutty stuff, and a convincing, professional and damning explanation of it.
In short, "Roswell Rods" are theoretical cylindrical lifeforms with fins/wings that are alleged to fly too fast for the naked eye to make them out, but are often caught on film cavorting amongst the clouds or landscape. Their size varies from a few inches to a few hundred feet. Most people write them off immediately as blurs of things passing the camera, and this indeed makes a good deal of sense, as shown by the second link up there.
This guy's explanation of Roswell Rods seemed to me to be the last word on the silly things until I noticed something odd. I'm a self-important fop, so I'll paste my entire e-mail to the fellow regarding my concerns.
Well, okay, just the bits relevant to my point.
quote:
(snip)
However, I have one concern...
At roswellrods.com, if you go to "Theories Of Origin" (sweet gods, they're guessing which Cambrian organisms these damned bug blurs came from!) and look at the picture for "rods", the sinusoidal patterns making up the "fins" or "wings" don't look exactly as one might expect. If they are, in fact, the motion blurs of a bug flapping its wings (4 fins per frame makes 480 beats per second, which is fair), one would expect them to extend triangularly out of the body and disappear back into it in the same way. If you'll excuse my ASCII art:
/\ /\ /\ /\
/ \/ \/ \/ \
=================
\ /\ /\ /\ /
\/ \/ \/ \/
That's what I'd expect to see. However, what we see is a diamond extending from the body -- that is, if the length of the streak is basically the same object at different points in time, we should see the wings extend out to their full length then draw back in, as above, but instead, if taken temporally, the visible part of the wing appears away from the body, then extends towards it until it joins, the disappears back into a point. F'rinstance (sorry, again):
/\ /\ /\ /\
\/ \/ \/ \/
=================
/\ /\ /\ /\
\/ \/ \/ \/
So, why, oh why? As far as I can tell, your bugrods exhibit the first (expected) appearance but the rods exhibit the latter one -- look at the skydiver rods on your web page, for instance. I'd say the constant relationship between the rods' speed and their length, as well as the damning similarity to your bug pictures, pretty much has put the bizarre roswell rod theory to rest, but I am curious as to why we see these diamonds instead of the proper triangles (or more accurately, blurs) of your bug shots.
So... what's the consensus 'lither opinion, then? Why, oh why, oh why?
[ 02-11-2001: Message edited by: Mister Snee ] |
|
|