BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


What are the most important books of all time (to you)?

 
  

Page: (1)2

 
 
Matrixian
18:16 / 29.07.06
We have probably all, at one point or another, come across popularised lists of the greatest or most important books ever written, but most such lists are rather flat, in my view. These lists, for example, are certainly interesting and have many classics on them, but they are rather "obvious" lists, in my opinion.

I’ve noticed a great deal of eclecticism here, which is why I am soliciting Barbelith members to compile their own lists of the greatest books ever written. Cyberpunk or romance novels, Aleister Crowley or Ann Coulter, Plato or William Burroughs...whatever. The list doesn’t have to have a minimum or maximum number of entries, or be in any sort of order. All I want to know is: what books do you think are the most important books ever written, and why? What are the books that have affected you greatly, affected the world greatly, and/or should be read more widely so that they can affect the world greatly?

No lengthy reviews are required (though I, for one, would certainly welcome supplementary information). Just some consideration of your choices would be appreciated, and a few words about each title or author if you have the time and inclination.

I haven’t read that much, myself (which is partly why I am asking for such lists in the first place), but I shall start by mentioning a book that is "alternative" even within the alternative political sub-genre that is John F. Kennedy assassination literature: Final Judgment, by Michael Collins Piper.

This book is, in my view, one of the most informative books on conspirational politics ever written, and probably one of the single best volumes on the Kennedy assassination. In it the author makes the case that rogue Israeli government elements were in some way responsible for the assassination of JFK, along with their allies in the Mafia and CIA. His case is not airtight, but few conspiracy theories are. What he does do convincingly is collate massive amounts of detrimental data and suggestive evidence on Israel, and much more besides. This book is almost a primer on recent global political history, since it encompasses much more than just the assassination of JFK. Vietnam, Watergate, Communist China, Iran, George H. W. Bush, Neo-Nazis...there is a lot of diverse material in this book, in addition to the normal breadth of material that one would expect to find in a book on this subject. Many conspiracies, forgotten histories, and questionable facts are discussed here. I cannot categorically say that Piper is correct about everything, for I have not yet had the time to reference-check everything, but I am aware from other researches that many of his assertions are not impossible, or even improbable. Both book and author are quite controversial, and it is almost worth reading the book on that basis alone, but I think that most who read this will come away with a new perspective on the secret and illegal political machinations that form the undercurrents of visible democracy, and will also desire to learn more, which is important even if one questions Piper’s assertions.

Incidentally, if you’re interested in obtaining a copy of the book, try to get the most recent sixth edition, since it is the most up-to-date; some of the earliest editions have much less data.

A detailed review of the book

The press release for the Sixth Edition (PDF format)

Anyone else read or heard about this book?
 
 
Saturn's nod
19:37 / 29.07.06
Not heard of it.

I just remembered there is What's 'required reading' in your opinion? thread which is kind of related though more about shorter pieces - essays and so on - which might be of interest.
 
 
ibis the being
19:57 / 29.07.06
One of the most important books of all time to me is one called Bones Would Rain from the Sky by Suzanne Clothier. It's a kind of dog training or dog-human relationship philosophy (as opposed to practical tips) treatise. I had read several training and behavior books before I found it but none gave me the lightbulb-over-the-head feeling of revelation that this one did. She takes such an intensely sympathetic view toward dog psychology that a lot of people find her off-puttingly "soft," but I think she just makes good sense. She eschews all the little tricks and regulations and tools of force that most people use to control dogs, in favor of true understanding, and doing the hard work that's needed to bond correctly and closely with a canine pet. I wish humane societies and breeders handed it out for free, one copy along with every dog.

I'm sure I have more but that's one to start.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
21:27 / 29.07.06
Ooh, thanks, ibis, I think I'll be buying that one!
 
 
Kiltartan Cross
22:34 / 29.07.06
Please excuse my haphazard pacing.

I'll say read Antoine de St. X's Le Petit Prince, if only to dismiss it as overly sentimental (which, while not my feeling about the book, is probably accurate); an everyday story of a stranded pilot, the titular prince, a fox and a snake. Which book takes us in stunning segue straight in to The Feynman Lectures on Physics (honestly, it does), probably still the introductory physics text book.

Oh! And The Times History of the World, which takes a refreshingly global (as opposed to Eurocentric) approach to world history, and which is very nicely laid out, with splendid maps and whatnot on every page. Very good stuff.

Er... and The Man Who Was Thursday: A Nightmare, by G.K. Chesterton; a surreal tale of a wild chase of anarchists with a strange ending. Love it.

Finally, of course, I can't get away without mentioning Alan Garner's Red Shift; magic, love, hate, loss, betrayal, depression, despair, madness, Toms Fool, Lin and Rhymer, there's no castle on the top of Mow Cop. My favourite book, which I'm afraid says a lot about me; but I've plugged it enough times so I'll leave it there.
 
 
Matrixian
08:37 / 30.07.06
Please excuse my haphazard pacing.

At your convenience, of course.

I'll say read Antoine de St. X's Le Petit Prince, if only to dismiss it as overly sentimental (which, while not my feeling about the book, is probably accurate); an everyday story of a stranded pilot, the titular prince, a fox and a snake.

Sounds a bit philosophical, which is interesting. I hope it's as good (or better) than Wind, Sand and Stars, which had some great use of language (though that may, come to think of it, be due to the translator).

Which book takes us in stunning segue straight in to The Feynman Lectures on Physics (honestly, it does), probably still the introductory physics text book.

Do you think this book will be accessible to those who know nothing about physics to begin with?

Oh! And The Times History of the World, which takes a refreshingly global (as opposed to Eurocentric) approach to world history, and which is very nicely laid out, with splendid maps and whatnot on every page. Very good stuff.

This is a general, "standard" book?

Alan Garner's Red Shift...My favourite book, which I'm afraid says a lot about me...

Really? What does it say? ; )
 
 
Matrixian
08:40 / 30.07.06
Bones Would Rain from the Sky by Suzanne Clothier

Is the author's approach or thesis controversial at all, or is it a widely accepted viewpoint?
 
 
Kiltartan Cross
09:36 / 30.07.06
(Feynman)
Do you think this book will be accessible to those who know nothing about physics to begin with?

They're the transcriptions of lectures given to first year undergraduates, if memory serves me right; a good general knowledge of physics and maths would be a great help before starting them.

(Times History of the World)
This is a general, "standard" book?

Well, yes, I suppose so, but I'd certainly call it indispensable. I hope I don't displease you by doing so! In retrospect, there must be dozens I'd recommend which probably fall onto those 'flat lists', mind.

(Red Shift)
Really? What does it say? ; )

That I'm tragically enamoured of magic, love, hate, loss, betrayal, depression, despair, and madness, and possess them all to one degree or another; I empathise with no other characters to the same degree as I do with the leads in that book. Which is all, perhaps, faintly ridiculous; it's only a book, and what power do they have?

Oh! This (or English) I love.
 
 
Matrixian
10:01 / 30.07.06
(Times History of the World)

This is a general, "standard" book?

Well, yes, I suppose so, but I'd certainly call it indispensable. I hope I don't displease you by doing so! In retrospect, there must be dozens I'd recommend which probably fall onto those 'flat lists', mind.

No need to worry about my pleasure or displeasure. By all means, please speak your mind.

(Red Shift)

Really? What does it say? ; )

That I'm tragically enamoured of magic, love, hate, loss, betrayal, depression, despair, and madness, and possess them all to one degree or another; I empathise with no other characters to the same degree as I do with the leads in that book.

You say that as if it were a bad thing. ; )

Which is all, perhaps, faintly ridiculous; it's only a book, and what power do they have?

Not ridiculous at all. Books have tremendous power.

Thank you for your recommendations.
 
 
ibis the being
19:03 / 30.07.06
Is the author's approach or thesis controversial at all, or is it a widely accepted viewpoint?

Hmm, what in the dog world isn't controversial? Pretty much everything is contentious when it comes to either feeding or training a dog - at least in the US, I don't know about elsewhere.

The most popular school of thought (if you can call it that, since I find very little of it academic or thoughtful) in the US right now wrt dogs is "dominance theory" also commonly known as "Cesar's way" because of a popular TV program called The Dog Whisperer. Suzanne Clothier is pretty much the antithesis of this popular school of thought, although she does not reject the idea of human leadership. Actually, if you are interested in learning a little about her views, she has an excerpt from the book as well as several articles she's written up on her website, Flying Dog Press.

I hope you like it, Stoatie... it was pretty eyeopening for me.
 
 
astrojax69
22:26 / 30.07.06
in all these important books, no-one mentions the dictionary?

would be among my five desert island tomes (i'd try to sneak on the 16 vol oxford, but the 2 vol shorter is to hand...)
 
 
redtara
23:59 / 30.07.06
I prefer Roget, only having a crappy Collins Concise. Probably why my spellings so shit and why I don't care.

Elegant Universe, Brian Greene. Glorious step by step fully accessable tour from Newtonian through Einstien into string. I re read it every couple of years. Don't care that it's probably already out of date. I invoke it on shit days and can see wonder in paving stones.

Women Who Run With the Wolves, Clarissa Pinkola Estes. Femmanine wisdom in folk tales. Stopped me feeling like an angry schizophrenic and just a complex person.

Tracks in the Psychic Wilderness; An Exploration of ESP, Remote Viewing, Precognitive Dreaming and Synchronicity, Dale E. Graff. This bloke was an US airforce engineer and was seconded to oversee the CIA's remote viewing unit. It's like finding out there really are fairies...

Awakening the Buddhist Heart, Lama Surya Das. A first primer in buddhist philosophy, gorgeous. Made me feel that everyone and everything was good. Even the shit could work itself out into possitivity. 400 pages of soul cuddles.

God I could do this all night, but must read/sleep, I'm reading The Dante Club, Mathew Pearl. Thriller in 19C Boston, not all that thrilling actually, but once started...
 
 
MintyFresh
21:04 / 01.08.06
Good Omens by Neil Gaiman-Not a literary great, I know, but it has a very interesting view on religion and life that I think could revolutionize spirituality if put into a more serious medium.

The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald-This book questions life and forces the reader to do the same. This book was the first to crack my shell of naivety and show me that the world wasn't all lollipops and sunshine.

Where the Red Fern Grows by Wilson Rawls-Everyone in the world should be required to read this so that they can say that at least one book has made them cry.

The Chronicles of Narnia by C.S. Lewis-I'm old enough to start reading fairytales again. Plus, I like that the books don't take their religious metaphors and beat you with them. They're meant to be fairytales, but there is deeper stuff there for those who want to see it.
 
 
Shrug
22:01 / 01.08.06
There's probably more immediately obvious choices but as far as specific editions of a text go I was lucky enough to be given a edition of The New Waverley Dictionary of the English Language, which I'd always admired from a far, a couple of months ago. It's a blue hardback copy with gold embossing and a small image of a open book bisected by a candle and its flame at the centre which runs along the dictionary's spine. It boasts "Nearly 1300 New Illustrations" and numerous suplemental sections at the back, including one which comprises words coined, introduced or brought in popular use during and since the Great War. I tried to locate a date of publication on it the other day but alas to no avail. It's really quite extensive in its coverage, though, and seems full of archaic spellings and many words that I would have otherwise never encountered (even if I'll never use them).

It also has really quite alot of sentimental value as this is the tome my father and I always sought wisdom from in efforts to complete a difficult crossword clue. And henceforth some of my fondest childhood memories relating to him are bound to it. He gave it to me a couple of days after I officially came out to my parents (which really was the sweetest gesture I ever could have imagined).
 
 
astrojax69
22:40 / 01.08.06
i love my 2 vol shorter oxford. got it as a special big pressie to myself when i started 1st year uni as a mature student, so i had a job... best thing i ever did; though i still regret that i didn't take my philosophy professor up on his offer, as a published oxford press author, he was being given the opportunity at the run-out sale of full 16 vol sets for just on a grand, normally retail at close to four grand [!] but oxford had revised edition coming and so was selling old stock - he offered to get a set for anyone interested. i was soooo close...

but use the dictionary probably most weeks, if not more often.


other necessary books [for me] in no real order:

joyce's ulysses just for such wonderfully rich stream of consciousness prose and incessant wonderful wordplay - sound meaning context associations all at once!

to kill a mockingbird such a pivotal book in my understanding something of the world as a young'un

on the road my introduction to be bop, beat and a disdain of 'tourism' over 'travel'

nietzsche's beyond good and evil also wonderful prose, deep and puzzling insights in pithy bites and another book that gave me a sense of paradigms being subverted

nino cullotta [aka john o'grady]'s they're a weird mob a fabulous romp through australian ['strine] idiom and a well constructed story of successful australian immigration, even in a late 50s book... strewth!

calvino's wonderful if on a winter's night a traveller again, paradigms shifting and subverted, what you are allowed to do...


and ta matrixian, good thread... i suppose many books do for others what these do for me - so is always going to be a personal choice premised on circumstance of when you get to read something.
 
 
paranoidwriter waves hello
23:32 / 01.08.06
I've got too many to list here, so I thought I'd choose just a couple of my choices, the ones which first sprang into my mind when I read the thread-title:


1984 by George Orwell - I read this when I in my early teens and it was the first time I felt I had a starting point to explain the world and the injustices my young eyes were witnessing in life and via the goggle-box. Of course, the dystopia George Orwell painted was awe inspiring and I was gripped by Winston Smith's story; but it was Goldstein's political analysis, "the book" within the book, which really flicked a switch in my mind. Indeed, I promised myself I'd read it again this year to see how I've changed and to remind myself of Orwell's lesson to us all. I doubt I'll be disappointed.


The Glass Bead Game: (Magister Ludi) A Novel by Hermann Hesse - I read Hesse's Nobel winning masterpiece about eleven years ago, and at the end of each section my jaw dropped slightly lower. By the time I finished "The Posthumous writings of Joseph Knecht" (the final section of the book), I felt I knew nothing and had everything to learn, which was one of the most liberating feelings I've ever had.

For those who haven't heard of this book, I've selectively copied and pasted text from The Glass Bead Game's Wiki Page, to provide a partial synopsis:


"The Glass Bead Game focuses on a monastic order of intellectuals in the fictional province of Castalia. The story takes place in the distant future and is recorded by a future historian. The current era is referred to only vaguely as an intellectually superficial and decadent period - described as the Age of the Feuilleton. ...

... In this setting of Castalia the movements of Joseph Knecht are chronicled by the book. ...

... At the center of this society lies the (fictitious) glass bead game. The precise rules of the game are only alluded to, and must be so sophisticated that they are not easy to imagine. Essentially the game is an abstract synthesis of all arts and scholarship. It proceeds by players making deep connections between seemingly unrelated topics. For example, a Bach concerto may be related to a mathematical formula. ... "



It's funny, but when I first saw Barbelith's home-page it triggered a memory of the wonderful Glass Bead Game itself; an association which I would still think is valid. However, I really should read this book again soon to refresh my memory, as (like "1984") I think this is a book which, upon re-reading, will reveal more and more as I grow older.

Matrixian, thanks for starting this thread: the word "important" in your thread-title really got me thinking.

Saturn's nod, sorry, I hadn't seen your thread before; but I figure my choices are better off here as I'd feel a bit uncomfortable saying my two choices (above) were required reading -- indeed, you've stumped me on that one. Good/tough question (IMHO).
 
 
paranoidwriter waves hello
23:48 / 01.08.06
Doh! Again, sorry, Saturn's nod. I completely misread your post and then the opening post in your thread.

*blushes*

Ahem. Mind you, required essays is still a damn good topic, if you ask me, which you didn't, of course...

*runs out the room*
 
 
sorenson
02:13 / 02.08.06
I'm going to completely change the tone here - the most important book of all time for me is a young adult book called The Changeover by a New Zealand author called Margaret Mahy. It is still the only book that I can re-read indefinitely. I first read it when I was about 11 or 12, and while I can probably now come up with all sorts of deep and meaningful reasons why it resonates with me so strongly, at the time I just fell in love with the characters and the writing and the narrative, so much so that it has almost become part of me - for example, 'sorenson' is my favourite character in the book.

In fact, in general I feel more attached to teenage fiction and other books that I read when I was a teenager than to anything I have read as an adult. I wonder why that is? Does anybody else feel like that? (Sorry if that question counts as thread-rot!)
 
 
astrojax69
02:15 / 02.08.06
oops, italics went a bit haywire somewhere after nietzsche in my post above... prob'ly something in that... : )
 
 
Matrixian
05:11 / 02.08.06
That Pale Chick-

Good Omens by Neil Gaiman-Not a literary great, I know, but it has a very interesting view on religion and life that I think could revolutionize spirituality if put into a more serious medium.

Think even strictly orthodox monotheistic religious practitioners would find it interesting? I've heard a lot about Gaiman, but never read him.

And I agree with you about Where the Red Fern Grows- a very moving work. It reminds me a bit of the Italian film Umberto D, which is about an old man and his dog, and is also quite moving.
 
 
Matrixian
05:16 / 02.08.06
paranoidwriter-

Matrixian, thanks for starting this thread: you've really made me think. I think it was the word "important" which got me thinking.

You're welcome. I've read both your choices, and they are, in my opinion, important and necessary reading for everyone.

I always admired the vagueness with which Joseph Knecht's "end" was described- gave his life a sort of legendary and epic quality.
 
 
Matrixian
05:35 / 02.08.06
In fact, in general I feel more attached to teenage fiction and other books that I read when I was a teenager than to anything I have read as an adult. I wonder why that is? Does anybody else feel like that?

Well, people do tend to remember their "first time", whether it was their first kiss, first murder-attempt, or whatever. Perhaps the books we read as teenagers that we are so fond of were "firsts", in that they first introduced to us certain ideas and emotions?
 
 
Kiltartan Cross
23:13 / 02.08.06
"But you know we've changed so much since then, yeah, we've grown."

In fact, in general I feel more attached to teenage fiction and other books that I read when I was a teenager than to anything I have read as an adult. I wonder why that is? Does anybody else feel like that?

Well, people do tend to remember their "first time", whether it was their first kiss, first murder-attempt, or whatever. Perhaps the books we read as teenagers that we are so fond of were "firsts", in that they first introduced to us certain ideas and emotions?


I like a lot of "young adult" (and aren't I still one now? has my youth gone already? we hardly had time to say hello!) books, but only read a handful of them when I was in the "proper" age range. That being said, those handful were generally enough to prompt me, later, to work my way through the author's back catalogue; Dianna Wynne-Jones, Alan Garner, Rosemary Sutcliffe, C.S. Lewis are prime examples for me. But I must confess, I like a lot of more recent books in the subgenre. I don't really know what the appeal is; maybe that the world presented is simpler, so the story can develop in a clear, clean, contrasting, colourful way, and not be filled with all those nasty shades of grey our "adult" moral compasses get tired of dealing with. Then again, some books are full of grey and all, so that can't be the whole of it. Beats me.
 
 
illmatic
08:03 / 03.08.06
Matrixian: You might find this thread of interest re. JFK. As for your actual question, I'm finding it strangely hard to answer. More later, maybe.
 
 
Matrixian
10:08 / 03.08.06
I like a lot of "young adult"...books, but only read a handful of them when I was in the "proper" age range.

The best young adult books, in my view, can be read at almost any age. It is true that adult perceptions can often colour our views when we go back to material that entertained us as children, but sometimes adult perceptions can enhance our re-reading enjoyment. Depends on the text and person, really.
 
 
Matrixian
10:11 / 03.08.06
Matrixian: You might find this thread of interest re. JFK.

Interesting indeed; thank you for the link. I've read some of Ramsay's work, all of which is interesting and revealing.

Are you aware of any other resources like the Lobster CD-ROM? I'm wondering whether or not any other of the more well-known journals on conspiracies/parapolitics have released a CD-ROM containing back issues like Ramsay has.

As for your actual question, I'm finding it strangely hard to answer. More later, maybe.

At your convenience, of course.
 
 
illmatic
13:47 / 03.08.06
Are you aware of any other resources like the Lobster CD-ROM? I'm wondering whether or not any other of the more well-known journals on conspiracies/parapolitics have released a CD-ROM containing back issues like Ramsay has.

Erm, I'll have a think but nothing comes to mind straight away (I'm really useless in this thread, aren't I?)BTW, what other conspiracy/parapolitics journals would you recommend? The only one I know/read in any depth is Lobster.

As to answering the orignal question, I'm tempted to say Richard Wilhelm's translation of the I Ching but that's too .... easy. Reasons why - because for me anyway, it gives me practical and useable advice about my life, and I'm slowly growing in appreciation of it's value as literature, and the beauty of the teachings it's trying to encapsulate. Reasons why not - it's not really a one volume thing that you can sit pick up and read. My appreciation, such as it is, is based on other reading and books.

So, I'll fish around for another choice.
 
 
Matrixian
14:36 / 03.08.06
BTW, what other conspiracy/parapolitics journals would you recommend? The only one I know/read in any depth is Lobster.

I've not read any other ones myself, unfortunately. I believe I've read references to similar publications in Lobster, though, so your best bet is to go through some back issues and see if there is any information there.

By the way, do you know whether or not other people on these boards read or know of Lobster?

As to answering the orignal question, I'm tempted to say Richard Wilhelm's translation of the I Ching but that's too .... easy.

Is it widely regarded as the best version?
 
 
illmatic
14:53 / 03.08.06
Is it widely regarded as the best version?

Big question... but, yes. In terms of involvment with the text, Richard Wilhelm kind of wins hands down - 20+ years with a Chinese scholar of the old school - though we're now at a stage where a number of other Western scholars and interested parties have devoted similar sized chunks of their life to understanding the book. Some of these people inevitably have corrected or improved upon the odd aspect of his work, but largely it's been left unchallenged. Jung said of Wilhelm's book that it "delivered the last message of the old, dying China to Europe". It's a marvel, the language and insight is stunning in places, and sometimes stays with you for days after use or browsing.

Try herefor more.
 
 
Matrixian
15:02 / 03.08.06
Big question... but, yes.

Excellent; the Wilhelm translation is the one that I have read.

Do you happen to know more about the translations of "Eastern classics"? I've read some Confucian texts as translated by Legge. Is he also given the same respect and authority that Wilhelm apparently possesses?

By the way, on the parapolitical front, I do know the names of some American journals that focus on the Kennedy assassination. I've not read them, and I don't think they discuss parapolitics in general, and many of them are probably defunct by now, but I'll make a list of them if you require it.
 
 
illmatic
15:22 / 03.08.06
Legge's tanslation of the I Ching is not widely rated but some people find it useful, apparently. He was quite disparging of the text in some of his commnets and never put it to the test. I don't know about the critical status of the rest of his work, though I'd be surprised if it held in huge regard though, as it's a hundred years old. To me, the intersting thing about translation/scholarship etc. is that it doesn't *stop*, as such, and if one really wants to start digging, one can find contemporary works which re-assess such insights as people like Legge and Wilhlem might have had, critque them, re-evaluate and re-position etc.

I think there's a number of authors that get "canonised" in this way, and I don't always think that's helpful - Jung springs to mind.

Another point would be that there's numerous translations of various Chinese classics now, and to a degree to really grasp this stuff, you can't digest it simply, you have to live with it a bit, study it and approach it from different texts. If I wanted to deepen my understanding of the Tao Te Ching for instance, I'd read several translations, take notes on the text and it's application in my life, read some critical essays, perhaps do some meditation etc etc. Fact is, I'm NOT doing this with the I Ching or the Tao Te Ching, to my chagrin, but I think that's the way to go.

Re: The conspiracy stuff, cheers for the offer, but it's not really the JFK stuff I'm after. I find the field too daunting to be honest and I'm more interested in contemporary politics esp in the UK. There's an excellent article in the new issue about Labour Party funding, one of those pieces you read and think, "you know, I bet that's exactly how it is".
 
 
Matrixian
17:11 / 03.08.06
Thank you for the information.
 
 
grant
00:50 / 05.08.06
I'm being off-topic here, but for more Chinese textual fun (including the Wilhelm I Ching, but plenty more besides), check out Wengu.

On-topic, possibly the Tao te ching, but I hardly feel like I actually know it -- only various approximations, and that with a lot of interference from either hippie crap, or reactions against hippie crap. Written Chinese is such a multi-dimensional language, I think it's practically untranslatable. But maybe that's because I'm a newb.

Ray Bradbury's The Martian Chronicles probably did something to me when I was very young (as well as a parallel text some people think I dreamed, called The Silver Locusts, which collected some of the same stories, but in a slightly different order, and with some extras and some omissions). The idea of religion in space, and colonialism, the sense of culture being like an ecosystem (ancient buildings, mysterious ruins, different ways of thought), the destruction of Earth, and survival-by-becoming-alien -- those were (and are) important images and themes to me.
 
 
illmatic
10:15 / 05.08.06
Off topic again, but that link is so bookmarked, cheers, Grant. Have decided on my choice and will put a post up soon.
 
 
Sina Other
13:14 / 05.08.06
Ziauddin Sardar has compiled an 'eastern canon' in reply to Penguin's 'Great Ideas':

http://www.newstatesman.com/200411080047
 
  

Page: (1)2

 
  
Add Your Reply