Yeah, I was at the Reich talk, great stuff. I am a bit dubious about the wholesale "reframing" of negativity - but also about completely dissolving blocks and armour. There's positive and negative, and anyone trying to skirt around the basic nature of either is avoiding reality - seems pretty basic, no?
In my last session my big focus was on the pulse of my heartbeat as a feeling all through my body. Brought up images of waves crashing on the beach. For me breathwork's about undoing knots in the natural pulse of the body, the rhythms of the heart and breath. And I wonder if "reframing" and "dissolving" might both be part of this? Not really sure yet.
Sjoo quotes... Can't find any on the web. The guy I've been emailing with quotes extensively from her book 'New Age & Armageddon', so with the caveat that these quotes are 2nd-hand, some selections:
"When talking of 'prosperity consciousness', rebirthers teach that the poor are poor simply because they are not capable of receiving. Why is it that the poor are mostly in the Third World amongst non-white peoples? Answer: 'They have lessons to learn in this life-time' and they have brought this upon theselves. Such thinking sits well with the right-wing philosophy of Major, Thatcher, Bush and the white South African rulers to mention but a few."
"By concentrating solely on the individual mind-body-spirit, blame and guilt is thrown back on the individual who is made to think that s/he should be able to heal/himself by mind alone. This takes responsibility away, very conveniently for the rulers, from the obscene and death-dealing structures of imperialism, multinationals, nuclear war industries, coercion of, and violence towards, human beings and the feminisation of poverty..."
Seems like familiar New Age nonsense, views that can crop up in relation to any "technique". Or is there something inherent to certain technical approaches that create certain mindsets? If anything, though, my experience of breathwork seems to take me in exactly the opposite direction than what Sjoo sees in it.
Something more obviously specific to Grof/Rebirthing is the stuff about birth. This is a Sjoo quote from that guy's emails again, so caveats again about possible misquoting...
"Grof does not recognize that fear and confusion in an inexperienced mother, and alienating hospital surroundings, make delivery difficult and, he claims, creates
in the child a combination of libidinal feelings, painful physical sensations and aggression. With typical Christian puritan sentiment he says that confusion in the adult heterosexual male arises from the act the genitals and thighs of the woman are both the place of love and sex as well as 'where the nightmare of birth and filth had happened', the place of 'dangerous evil filled with the power of the witch'. He could not be more unequivocal than this. He writes that hospital birth is remembered vividly in LSD sessions down to the odours of anaesthetics, sounds of surgical instruments, use of forceps, bright lights and uncaring hands. The misogyny of therapists like Grof and of te Rebirthers makes it impossible for them to join hands with women demanding willing motherhood, and end to the oppression of women and the cruelty to women and our new-born babies involved in male-controlled hospital births. Not willing to question their own privileged positions as white males in oppressive societies, they end up blaming mothers."
Now, this seems like literalist wrong-headedness. I don't know about Rebirthing "ideology", but Grof is very far from Sjoo's image of him. Everything he's done points to a call for more humane birth practices. She sees those quotes as "unequivocal", but they're out of context. In context, he's giving expressions to people's experiential perception of certain aspects of "reliving birth" - experiences which also include images of the nurturing mother, ecstasy, joy, etc. So she zeroes in on the phrases that make her think of misogyny and holds them up as evidence.
Grof seems to me to accept that people have these horrific images, but wants them to be accepted and integrated. I wonder if dismissing any mention of horror in relation to birth, on politically right-on feminist grounds, actually serves to repress that aspect of birth even further - and leave it unintegrated, fuelling misogyny.
Makes me think of Kali - one aspect of Kali in relation to the whole Grof model of birth experience would be the threatening aspect of the mother as the baby's expelled. Our culture has blatantly repressed anything Kali-esque - leaving the negative aspects of motherhood to fester in the background and obsess people neurotically. Sjoo was well into Kali, but it doesn't show in her approach to Grof's work. Kali expresses something about motherhood, the dark side - and if she's dressed up to avoid words like "filthy" and "dangerous", she's probably not Kali anymore, eh?
(BTW, don't get me wrong, I love a lot of Sjoo's work - I just think she's dead wrong on this.) |