BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Black holes as Cosmological aporia?

 
 
Mystery Gypt
15:13 / 05.09.01
This article, a fairly mundane piece about physical evidence for the existence of a black hole in the milky way states that black holes may be at the center of all galaxies.

it reminds me of the the derridian theory that all structures have at their center a lack, or absence, and that the true foundation for a structure is the thing that must be outside it. black holes being an impossible density hiding an entirely other universe, they seem to be the astrophysical, or cosmological, version of an aporia.

just a passing thought, but i wnonder if anyone has thoughts on the idea of Deconstructionism in astrophysics?

[ 10-09-2001: Message edited by: grant ]
 
 
LaughingOtter
20:00 / 05.09.01
G'day!
This is not exactly a new theory. It was theorized after observation of one of the galaxies in Virgo several years ago revealed what could be a supermassive black hole at its center.
A black hole at the center of a galaxy would certainly cause the galaxy to eventually spin (conservation of momentum), though interacting galaxies would work somewhat differently (many-body problems best left to the real physicists).
It's been said (proven?) that tidal motion does directly affect the human body. I wonder what happens if you try to extend that to the tidal motions caused by local black holes (less than 25 light years distant)...they would be strong enough...
Also, there are Hubble pictures of black holes firing out continual super-jets of gamma rays and other extremely high-energy particles from their centers/event horizons. What of the effect on local space from these jet streams?
Oog. My brain already hurts.
And I have no idea about a real answer to your question, on account of we would have to know for sure what's outside of the universe we currently inhabit. What's the emptiness our universe is founded on? Is it something smaller than the Planck limit (<1.0e-36 cm)? You wouldn't be subject to gravity at that size, but space would be very empty as well.
Hey, is it just me, or does it appear that the smaller you go into things, the more they begin to resemble the extremely large things?
 
 
Mystery Gypt
18:53 / 06.09.01
quote:Originally posted by LaughingOtter:
Hey, is it just me, or does it appear that the smaller you go into things, the more they begin to resemble the extremely large things?



yeah, it's always seemed to me that the "laws of physics" work for the really small and the really big ones, but it is us medium sized things which are the anommoly
 
 
Lionheart
14:12 / 09.09.01
By the way, Mystery Gypt, how are ya? How's L.A.?
 
 
grant
13:23 / 10.09.01
We do have a way of projecting meaning into the unknown, don't we.

It's no wonder you'll see similar structures with the very big and the very small, because that's the border of our perceptions...
 
 
Lionheart
14:38 / 10.09.01
I thought that the border of our perceptions was Canada.
 
 
netbanshee
18:02 / 10.09.01
fractally...all things relate in shape to Canada...
 
  
Add Your Reply